2023年全國(guó)碩士研究生考試考研英語(yǔ)一試題真題(含答案詳解+作文范文)_第1頁(yè)
已閱讀1頁(yè),還剩8頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 74—76 (1998) 903—911An introduction to the Chinese wind-resistant design guideline for highway bridgesH.F. Xiang, A.R. Chen*, Z.X. LinWind Tunnel Laboratory, Depart

2、ment of Bridge Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, ChinaAbstractSome main comments upon the Chinese Wind Resistant Design Guideline for Highway Bridges are explained. The determination of bridge design wind

3、speeds, the calculation of wind loads including the static part and dynamic part, some empirical formulas for basic frequency estimation of cable-stayed bridges and suspension bridges, critical flutter wind speed estimat

4、ion at the preliminary design stage of bridges and the response spectrum method for estimating the buffeting response of bridges after completion are introduced. ? 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.Keywords:

5、 Highway bridge; Wind-resistant design; Guideline1. IntroductionIn the past 20 years, more than 20 cable-stayed bridges with a main span beyond 400 m and several suspension bridges with a span beyond 800 m have been cons

6、tructed in China. At the end of this century in China more long span cable- supported bridges across the sea straits and the Yangtze River will be constructed, some of them are now at the design and planning stage while

7、some are being constructed. Up to now, some wind resistant design guidelines for special bridges have been issued in several countries such as Japan [3], Denmark [6] and Britain [2]. For example, the Wind Resistant Desig

8、n Guideline for Honshu-Shikoku Bridge in Japan [3] and the Wind Resistant Design Guideline for the Great Belt Bridge in Denmark. As the terrain of China is different from these countries, it is necessary for China to hav

9、e her own wind resistant design guideline for bridges.* Corresponding author. E-mail: wtlbed@tju.ihep.ac.cn.0167-6105/98/$19.00 ? 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: S 0 1 6 7 - 6 1 0 5 ( 9 8 ) 0 0 0 8 2

10、 - 8meteorological station in the area where the bridge will be constructed. The terrain type is cataloged as Type II.2.2. Bridge standard design wind speedThe bridge standard design wind speed is the 10 min average wind

11、 speed at the height of the bridge decks. It depends on the terrain type of the bridge site and height of the bridge deck above ground or water. In the Guideline, 4 types of terrain are cataloged and the wind speed verti

12、cal profile is assumed to be in accordance with the exponential law. For terrain Types I, II, III, IV, exponential indexes ? are respectively 0.12, 0.16, 0.22, 0.30 and roughness heights z? are respectively 0.01, 0.05, 0

13、.30 and 1.0 m. The bridge standard design wind speed º? can be obtained byº?“K?º?? (1)in which K? is a factor depending on the terrain type of the bridge site and the height of the bridge deck above ground

14、 or water.2.3. Gusty wind speedThe gusty wind speed can be obtained fromº?“G?º? (2)in which G? is the gusty wind speed factor. Based on the method developed by Solari [9], the gusty wind speed factor was calcul

15、ated for the 4 terrain types defined in the Guideline by using Kaimal’s spectrum [12]. The values are given under the condition of wind speed º“40 m/s and z“40 m, the height of a bridge deck above the ground or wate

16、r. For terrain Types I and II G?“1.38; but for Types III and IV, G?“1.70. The gusty wind speed can be used for estimating wind loads of short span bridges or long-span bridges at their preliminary design stage.2.4. Flutt

17、er checking wind speedThe code for the allowable wind speed against flutter instability takes the same form established by the Honshu—Shikoku Bridge Authority in 1976:º??*[º??]“1.2??º?; in the range of !3&

18、#176;(?(#3° (3)in which º?? is the critical flutter wind speed of bridges obtained from wind tunnel tests or theoretical calculations; and ? is the attack angle of the air flow. The coefficient 1.2 is a princip

19、al safety factor considering reliability of experimental testing, design and construction of structures, social importance of structures and a destruc- tive feature of the flutter instability. The coefficient ?? is a con

20、ditional safety factor considering spatial gusty wind speed fluctuation. To cover all cataloged terrain types, the coefficient ?? is calculated for 4 terrain types by using Kaimal’s horizontal spectrum instead of Hino’s

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論