版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、This is the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for pub- lication in the following source:Jamtsho, Lungten in Iowa – for example, Doornink et al. (2003) and Wipf et al. (2003). A similar study on the
2、usage of Queensland FRWs is ongoing at the Queensland University of Technology, Australia. A demonstration bridge consisting of the FRW deck and reinforced concrete slab (RCS) pavement was constructed within the Rockham
3、pton Regional Council (RRC) jurisdiction, Queensland. The serviceability limit states of the FRW-RCS composite deck system is critical as the FRW has had a history of service load cycles as a rail freight wagon whilst th
4、e RCS is a cast-in-situ new component. As the bridge is situated in low volume traffic roads networks in RRC (Fact Sheet, 2010), fatigue was not considered. The bridge was tested for its performance. Performance load te
5、sts are generally carried out using pre-determined smaller loads that are well below the ultimate load level and hence are low-risk; smaller trucks loaded with aggregate/sand are generally used. These tests are a class o
6、f non-destructive testing and provide insight into the bridge response to the applied loads (Chajes et al. 2000 and Ryall, 2010) and the data may also be used to assess the design load behaviour using calibrated analytic
7、al/ numerical models (Richard et al. 2010). Such tests are performed on the ageing bridges that are in service (Saraf and Nowak, 1998); tests are also carried out on newly constructed bridges that incorporate novel const
8、ruction materials or design (Stalling and Yoo, 1993; Boully and Semple, 1997; Stone et al. 2001 and Journal of Bridge Engineering. Submitted May 30, 2011; accepted December 6, 2011; posted ahead of print December 8, 201
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- (節(jié)選)外文翻譯--以平板鐵軌作為橋面板的公路橋的性能測(cè)試(原文).pdf
- (節(jié)選)外文翻譯--以平板鐵軌作為橋面板的公路橋的性能測(cè)試(原文).pdf
- (節(jié)選)外文翻譯--以平板鐵軌作為橋面板的公路橋的性能測(cè)試
- (節(jié)選)外文翻譯--以平板鐵軌作為橋面板的公路橋的性能測(cè)試
- (節(jié)選)外文翻譯--以平板鐵軌作為橋面板的公路橋的性能測(cè)試(譯文)
- (節(jié)選)外文翻譯--以平板鐵軌作為橋面板的公路橋的性能測(cè)試(譯文).doc
- (節(jié)選)外文翻譯--以平板鐵軌作為橋面板的公路橋的性能測(cè)試(譯文).doc
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]--外文翻譯-復(fù)合材料公路橋梁疲勞評(píng)估(原文)
- 淺析公路橋梁的橋面防水問(wèn)題
- 外文翻譯--中國(guó)《公路橋梁抗風(fēng)設(shè)計(jì)指南》的幾點(diǎn)說(shuō)明(原文)
- 公路橋面瀝青混凝土鋪裝層性能評(píng)價(jià).pdf
- 外文翻譯--中國(guó)《公路橋梁抗風(fēng)設(shè)計(jì)指南》的幾點(diǎn)說(shuō)明(原文).pdf
- 外文翻譯--中國(guó)《公路橋梁抗風(fēng)設(shè)計(jì)指南》的幾點(diǎn)說(shuō)明(原文).pdf
- 淺議高速公路橋面病害防治
- 淺議高速公路橋面病害防治
- 2011年--外文翻譯-復(fù)合材料公路橋梁疲勞評(píng)估(原文).pdf
- 扁平鋼箱梁公路橋正交異性橋面板疲勞性能參數(shù)化分析研究.pdf
- 公路橋面鋪裝破壞的預(yù)防措施探討
- 公路橋梁橋面鋪裝施工的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策
- 關(guān)于公路橋梁橋面鋪裝中的幾點(diǎn)思考
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論