版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、上海交通大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文涉訴信訪的成因分析與對(duì)策建議研究——以上海市第二中級(jí)人民法院為例姓名:蔣晴申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專業(yè):法律指導(dǎo)教師:沈大明20081130上海交通大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文 5 THE RESEARCH OF CAUSE ANALYSIS AND COUNTERMEASURE PROPOSITION ON PROSECUTION-RELATED LETTERS AND VISITS ——demonstration analys
2、is of Shanghai No.2 Intermediate People’s Court ABSTRACT With the position of law improved in social life, a lot of dispute has rushed into court which causes over-hot improvement on administration of law, and the amount
3、 of letters and visits to the cases which have been in court proceedings have raised unprecedentedly in recent years. Under this situation, in 2004, letters and visits of this kind was defined as prosecution-related lett
4、ers and visits by Supreme People’s Court which tried to settle it by the way of amending justice supervision proceedings of , and remoulding re-trial application as right of petition to solve the problem of “difficulty t
5、o petition application”. In this article, in the sight of court which processes the prosecution-related letters and visits directly, through the contrast and analysis of known data, the situation of prosecution-related l
6、etters and visits the court faces realistically is indicated and the alleviation of high-speed improvement by amending is impossible. Prosecution-related letters and visits are not caused by the pure lack of protection
7、on petition right of party. During the special historical period, owing to the deficiency of environment and culture of law and the lack of systemic conception and understanding of administration of justice, when party o
8、f a specific case cannot make their petition get support from court and cannot think about themselves correctly as well as there are shortcomings with the job of court, prosecution-related letters and visits appears. Pro
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 海南省第二中級(jí)人民法院
- 北京第二中級(jí)人民法院第二審判區(qū)
- 北海市中級(jí)人民法院
- 北京第二中級(jí)人民法院第二審判區(qū)
- 北京第二中級(jí)人民法院第二審判區(qū)
- 林芝市中級(jí)人民法院
- 上海市第一中級(jí)人民法院執(zhí)行裁判工作情況
- 北京市第二中級(jí)人民法院第二審判區(qū)
- 杭州市中級(jí)人民法院
- 常德市中級(jí)人民法院
- 南寧市中級(jí)人民法院
- 佛山市中級(jí)人民法院
- 江門中級(jí)人民法院采購(gòu)項(xiàng)目
- 承德中級(jí)人民法院委托鑒定
- 承德中級(jí)人民法院委托鑒定
- 資陽市中級(jí)人民法院
- 2016年市中級(jí)人民法院部門預(yù)算-韶關(guān)市中級(jí)人民法院
- 杭州市中級(jí)人民法院
- 沈陽市中級(jí)人民法院
- 青島市中級(jí)人民法院
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論