版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、Vocabulary is central to language. Vocabulary knowledge is now recognized as amajor factor in language learning, reading comprehension and .its evaluation.Vocabulary plays a very important role in reading tests and readi
2、ng research hasconsistently found a word knowledge factor an which vocabulary tests Ioad highly. The present study mainly investigated the relationship between vocabulary size,specific vocabulary knowledge and readin
3、g comprehension in Chinese EFL setting.The results show that the Vocabulary Levels Test can predict vocabulary size inChinese EFL setting and it is a more reliable test and can make finer distinctionswithin the group com
4、pared with the traditional vocabulary size test in Chineseresearch. Moreover, the correlation between VLT and reading comprehension isltigher than that of scares on traditional vocabulary size test and reading. It is fou
5、ndthat the correlations among specific voca}nlary knowledge, vocabulary size and:jading comprehension are very high. But specific vocabulary knowl}rlge adds anoficeable prediction in reading comprehension over and above
6、the prediction alreadyafforded by vocabulary size. The additional prediction can be explained by the abilityto infer from the context, activating content schemata and the knowledge of polysemyof the words. It is also fou
7、nd that learners often overestimate their understanding ofwords. The mismatch is due to learners' unawareness of an unknown word andpolysemy of the words. The words with similar forms and with a deceptivemorphological st
8、ructure are especially difficult for the learners to learn. Since vocabulary knowledge扭ays an important role in reading performance, theuse of a dictionary to increase comprehension seems to have rational appeal. How
9、ever,the previous research provided the contradictory findings. Attracted by the widespreaduse of electronic dictionaries and motivated by the contradictory findings, thedictionary use during reading was also investigate
10、d in the present study to comparewith the findings of the previous research. The results show that the. access to abilingual electronic dictionary has a significant effect on the reading scores for both high proficiency
11、b oup and low proFciency b oup. It is due to quick access toelectronic dictionaries and relatively Limited control of vocabulary in English_ It isalso found that dictionary use largely helped with the microprocessing of
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 閱讀前中后兩種注釋的使用對(duì)閱讀理解和詞匯學(xué)習(xí)的影響.pdf
- 工作記憶和詞匯知識(shí)對(duì)藝術(shù)專(zhuān)業(yè)學(xué)生英語(yǔ)閱讀理解的影響.pdf
- 從背景知識(shí)與詞匯角度分析圖式知識(shí)對(duì)英語(yǔ)閱讀的影響.pdf
- 中國(guó)EFL學(xué)習(xí)者閱讀中母語(yǔ)的使用研究.pdf
- 詞匯和背景知識(shí)對(duì)高中生不同文體英語(yǔ)閱讀成績(jī)的影響.pdf
- 投入量,工作記憶和詞匯知識(shí)對(duì)于基于閱讀的詞匯附帶習(xí)得的影響.pdf
- 詞匯知識(shí)對(duì)閱讀理解作用的實(shí)證研究.pdf
- 詞匯知識(shí)和閱讀理解關(guān)系的實(shí)證性研究.pdf
- 詞匯知識(shí)在閱讀概括任務(wù)中的作用:從詞匯廣度和深度知識(shí)的視角.pdf
- 詞匯組塊和詞匯量對(duì)二語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)者閱讀流利程度的影響.pdf
- 基于語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的EFL學(xué)習(xí)者詞匯知識(shí)的研究.pdf
- 詞匯知識(shí)深度對(duì)產(chǎn)出性詞匯習(xí)得的影響.pdf
- 工作記憶和詞匯信息對(duì)漢語(yǔ)閱讀中跳讀的影響研究.pdf
- 閱讀例句和造句對(duì)二語(yǔ)詞匯附帶習(xí)得的影響研究.pdf
- 英語(yǔ)詞匯知識(shí)廣度和深度對(duì)非英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)學(xué)生閱讀理解影響的相關(guān)研究.pdf
- 元認(rèn)知策略對(duì)EFL寫(xiě)作的影響.pdf
- 工作記憶和詞匯信息對(duì)漢語(yǔ)閱讀中跳讀的影響研究
- 文體與長(zhǎng)度對(duì)EFL寫(xiě)作的影響.pdf
- 注釋方式對(duì)閱讀中詞匯習(xí)得的影響.pdf
- 注釋對(duì)閱讀中詞匯附帶習(xí)得的影響.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論