《契丹國志》研究_7350.pdf

1、版權聲明任何收存和保管本論文各種版本的單位和個人，未經本論文作者同意，不得將本論文轉借他人，亦不得隨意復制、抄錄、拍照或以任何方式傳播。否則，引起有礙作者著作權之問題，將可能承擔法律責任。’AStudyonQidanguozhiGaoYu(AncientChineseHistory)DirectedbyProfessorLiUPujiangAbstractOidanguozhi(《契丹國志》)iSaonlyhistoricalliter

2、atureaboutthehistoryoftheLiaoDynastywhichiSsystematicexceptLiaoshi(《遼史》)It’SunknownaboutitSsource，buttothiSdayitiSoftenusedbytheresearchersstudyingtheLiaohistorySomescholarshavestudieditbefore，butconsideringthatitiSimpor

3、tantfortheLiaohistoryresearchers，currentresearchiSnotenoughThiSpapermainlYinvolvesthef01lowingthreeaspects，exploringthehistoricalsourceofOidanguozhi，analyzingthedocumentaryvalueofthebook，andhowdidtheimperial1ibraryoffiCi

4、alSadaptthebookOnthehistoricalsourceofOidanguozhi，thiSpaperhassomenewconclusions：first，peopleusedtothinkthattheinformationofBijisinOidanguozhimainlydrawnfromtheZizhitongjian(《資治通鑒》)，Xuzizhitongjianchangbian(《續(xù)資治通鑒長編》)and

5、otherbooksButthiSstudyshowsthatZizhitongjiangangmu(《資治通鑒綱目》)andHuangchaobianniangangmubeiyao(《皇朝編年綱目備要》)arealSOoneoftheimportantsourceofPijissecond，exploringthehiStoricalsourceofOidanguozhi，Idiscoverithasmanyerrorsandomi

6、SSionsbookwhencopyinghistoricalmaterialSForexample，becausesomechroniC、eofmonthinTongjiangangmuiSnotC、earthetimeinOidanguozhiwhichiSfromTongjiangangmuiSwrongCopyingthehistoricalcommentSinYongjiangangmuwhichquotesfromother

7、books，itmistaken”Hushiyue”(“胡氏日”)asHuAnguo(胡安國)saidAccordingtomyresearch，”Hushiyue，”isHuYin(胡寅)saidwhichiSfromZhitangdushiguanjian(《致堂讀史管見》)Third，IalSOhypothesizethehistoricalsourcesofsomehiStoricalmaterialSwhoseoriginiS