倫敦奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)與荷蘭女子曲棍球隊(duì)犯規(guī)特點(diǎn)的比較研究.pdf

1、倫敦奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)與荷蘭女子曲棍球隊(duì)犯規(guī)特點(diǎn)的比較研究論文隨機(jī)驗(yàn)證編號(hào)：BT5112017262053IV 摘要 摘要 隨著現(xiàn)代女子曲棍球運(yùn)動(dòng)技、戰(zhàn)術(shù)的不斷創(chuàng)新，整體水平顯著提升，比賽節(jié)奏加快，對(duì)抗更加激烈，使得不同隊(duì)伍之間的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)更加激烈并趨于白熱化，犯規(guī)明顯增加。對(duì)于球隊(duì)而言，盡量控制或減少因犯規(guī)造成的失分，同時(shí)根據(jù)比賽的實(shí)際情況巧妙的利用犯規(guī)，是一支球隊(duì)技戰(zhàn)術(shù)意識(shí)、能力及整體經(jīng)驗(yàn)成熟的表現(xiàn)，也是現(xiàn)代比賽中取得最終勝利的關(guān)鍵之所在。 本文

2、對(duì) 2012 年倫敦奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)與荷蘭隊(duì)比賽中犯規(guī)特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的比較分析，得出現(xiàn)代女子曲棍球比賽中犯規(guī)現(xiàn)象的一般規(guī)律與特征，發(fā)現(xiàn)我們的不足與差距，分析其背后的原因及犯規(guī)現(xiàn)象所反映的問(wèn)題，找出中國(guó)隊(duì)與荷蘭隊(duì)之間的差距，從而使球隊(duì)能夠更加清晰的認(rèn)識(shí)和利用犯規(guī)。 通過(guò)研究，得到如下基本結(jié)論： 1.中國(guó)隊(duì)犯規(guī)的次數(shù)尤其是防守的犯規(guī)次數(shù)明顯多于比荷蘭隊(duì)，反映出中國(guó)隊(duì)在技術(shù)動(dòng)作方面的不成熟。相比之下，荷蘭隊(duì)對(duì)于規(guī)則的掌握程度更好，她們的技術(shù)動(dòng)作更加符

3、合競(jìng)賽規(guī)則的要求，因而犯規(guī)次數(shù)較少。主要反映在搶斷時(shí)，身體位置不正確，當(dāng)對(duì)方球員變向后，重心不能及時(shí)的跟上，所以造成犯規(guī)。 2.中國(guó)隊(duì)與荷蘭隊(duì)犯規(guī)類(lèi)型的數(shù)據(jù)分布基本相同，在進(jìn)攻中的犯規(guī)皆以腳球犯規(guī)為最多，以 5 米犯規(guī)為最少，兩隊(duì)在進(jìn)攻中都有大量腳碰球的犯規(guī)現(xiàn)象；兩隊(duì)的防守犯規(guī)皆以球棍犯規(guī)為最多，其次是腳球犯規(guī)、身體犯規(guī)，而危險(xiǎn)球犯規(guī)、5 米犯規(guī)及動(dòng)球犯規(guī)三種犯規(guī)類(lèi)型的次數(shù)都比較少。但也反應(yīng)出中國(guó)隊(duì)隊(duì)員的基礎(chǔ)技術(shù)有待提高，在高強(qiáng)度對(duì)抗下

4、擊起高球，在前場(chǎng)失去了一次進(jìn)攻機(jī)會(huì)，在后場(chǎng)則給對(duì)手一次進(jìn)攻機(jī)會(huì)。 3.中國(guó)隊(duì)在中后場(chǎng)犯規(guī)次數(shù)明顯多于荷蘭隊(duì)，說(shuō)明中國(guó)隊(duì)在前場(chǎng)的逼搶不夠兇猛，讓對(duì)手輕松的通過(guò)第一道防線，后場(chǎng)犯規(guī)次數(shù)的增加給后衛(wèi)線造成巨大的壓力，形成被動(dòng)的局面。 4.中國(guó)隊(duì)與荷蘭隊(duì)在攻、防犯規(guī)的時(shí)間特征方面有很大差異，荷蘭隊(duì)進(jìn)攻犯規(guī)在下半場(chǎng)明顯比上半場(chǎng)多，而中國(guó)隊(duì)進(jìn)攻犯規(guī)上下半場(chǎng)比較均衡，上半場(chǎng)的進(jìn)攻犯規(guī)次數(shù)略高于下半場(chǎng)；在防守犯規(guī)方面，荷蘭隊(duì)上半場(chǎng)的防守犯規(guī)次數(shù)比下半場(chǎng)

5、多，而中國(guó)隊(duì)防守犯規(guī)的次數(shù)上半場(chǎng)比下半場(chǎng)少。防守犯規(guī)次數(shù)在上下半場(chǎng)的差異，體現(xiàn)了荷蘭隊(duì)作為強(qiáng)隊(duì)，在下半場(chǎng)對(duì)比賽的控制力在不斷加強(qiáng)。 倫敦奧運(yùn)會(huì)中國(guó)與荷蘭女子曲棍球隊(duì)犯規(guī)特點(diǎn)的比較研究論文隨機(jī)驗(yàn)證編號(hào)：BT5112017262053VI ABSTRACT Then number of foul times, especailly the Defensive Foul times, of Chinese team wa

6、s signifincantly higher than that of Netherlands team, which reflected their immaturity in the technic skills. On the contrast, the Netherlands team for a better mastery of the rules, they were more in line with the re

7、quirements of the competition, and thus committed fewer fouls. Most of the fouls of Netherlands team happened in the time of steals. While their body was not in the right place,so they were not

8、able to adjust in time when the opponents turned direction. The data distribution of the types of fouls shows similarity in the two teams. In which foot foul during attacking counted for the most, while 5 meters foul

9、shared the least part. Both teams had lots of foot fouls when attacking. Tackle fouls during defending took a great part of the total fouls, followed by foot foul and body foul. The dangerous ball, five meters foul and m

10、ove the ball after whistle foul are the 3 least happened types. The data also reflects the needs of basic technic improvement of Chinese team. Striking a high ball under high strength would lose a chance to attack in fr

11、ont area, which also gave a chance to the opponent to attack. The number of fouls in the back area of Chinese team was significantly higher than that of the Netherlands team, which shows that the weak defense of Chinese

12、 team in the frontcourt made the opponents easily went through the first defending line. The increase of foul times on the back area led to the enormous pressure on the back players, forming passive situation. The char

13、acrestics of foul time in attack and defence of both teams shows significantly differences. The foul times in second half of attack from Netherlands team were significantly higher than the first half, while the Chinese