胡安國“夏時冠周月”考論

1、湘潭大學碩士學位論文胡安國“夏時冠周月”考論姓名：吳強申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：中國哲學指導教師：鄧輝20080520IIAbstract Hu Anguo, a scholar of Song Dynasty, put forward a theory of xiashi guan zhouyue in his studies of Chunqiu(The spring and Autumn Annals). The theory su

2、ggested that Chunqiu adopted a mixed calendar system, in which the four seasons were referred back to the calendar of Xia Dynasty and the months the calendar of Zhou Dynasty. The theory had encountered different reaction

3、s from then on. For example, Song Dynasty scholar Zhu Xi, Yuan Dynasty scholar Zhao Pang, Ming Dynasty scholar Jiang Bao, Qing Dynasty scholar Mao Qilin adopted a mixed calendar system, in which the four seasons and the

4、months were referred to the calendar of Zhou Dynasty. But Song Dynasty scholar Jia Xuanweng and Chen Shen adopted a mixed calendar system, in which the four seasons and the months were referred back to the calendar of Xi

5、a Dynasty. In addition, Some scholars didn’t advocate any comments. Such as the Yuan Dynasty Zheng Yu didn’t know which perspective should be adopted after he verified the classical text. Until modern times, few scholars

6、 study this theory and there is no research work. Therefore, it’s necessary to find out the sequence of ideas. This paper intended to adopt the theory of xiashi guan zhouyue in his studies of Chunqiu as the core subjects

7、. Based on the existing research achievement, we divided the paper into two parts to investigate its origine and development by the textual research method. The part one make up of three chapters. The first chapter expla

8、ins the basic content of this theory of xiashi guan zhouyue in Hu Anguo’s studies of Chunqiu. The second chapter finds out the origin of this theory by analyzing Confucius's theory of using Xia Dynasty calendar and Y

9、ichuan’s theory of xiashi guan zhouyue in his studies of Chunqiu. The third chapter summarizes four different points of view which has already been mentioned in the above. However, we confirm that the season and the mont

10、h have been changed in Chunqiu through researching on Chunqiu, Zuozhuan, Maoshi, Shangshu, Zhouli, Liji and Mencius which concern the issue of Xia Dynasty calendar and Zhou Dynasty calendar. At last, we prove that what H

11、u Anguo said is wrong. The next part is also divided into three chapters. Firstly, we reveal Hu Anguo’s thought in his studies of Chunqiu through analysing the calendar issue in Chunqiu. He emphasized Yi Xia Debate to di