[雙語翻譯]外文翻譯--羅馬尼亞公共組織的職業(yè)壓力和組織承諾

1、1600 英文單詞， 英文單詞，1 萬英文字符，中文 萬英文字符，中文 2800 字文獻出處： 文獻出處：Cicei C C . Occupational stress and organizational commitment in Romanian public organizations[J]. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 33(2012):1077-1081.

2、Occupational stress and organizational commitment in Romanian public organizationsCristiana Catalina CiceiAbstractStudies indicate that high level of stress can lead to low organizational commitment, which can contribute

3、 to voluntarily employee turnover and may lead to low overall firm’s performance. Occupational Stress Scale (House, McMichael, Wells, Kaplan 1. IntroductionIt can be clearly noticed that occupational stress exists in all

4、 professions, and as Fletcher (cited by Fairbrother Pitariu & Chraif, 2009, Chraif, 2008) as well as the entire organization. As surveys of the scientific literature indicate, stress is associated with impaired indi

5、vidual functioning in the workplace (Fairbrother & Warn, 2003). Stress fundamentally initiates a number of complex changes on the psychological and emotional level (tiredness, anxiety and lack of motivation), cogniti

6、ve level (increased potential for error and, in some cases, accidents arising through error), behavioral level (poor or deteriorating relationships with colleagues, irritability, indecisiveness, absenteeism, smoking, ex

7、cessive eating and alcohol consumption) and on the physical level (increasing ill health associated with headaches, general aches and pains, and dizziness) (Stranks, 2005). Also, occupational stress is strongly associate

8、d with important organizational outcomes as reduced job satisfaction and organizational commitment or high employee withdrawal behavior (Fairbrother & Warn, 2003) and other organizational variables (Chraif & Anit

9、ei, 2011a).Regarding organizational commitment (OC), Mowday, Porter & Steers (as cited in Fields, 2002, p. 43) have defined it as a strong belief in and acceptance of the organization’s goals and values, a willingnes

10、s to exert considerable effort on behalf of the organization, and a strong desire to maintain membership in an organization. Usually, the various definitions of OC reflect three main types: commitment reflecting an affec

11、tive orientation toward the organization, commitment based on recognition of costs associated with leaving the organization and commitment based on moral obligation to remain with an organization (Meyer & Allen, 1997

12、). Thus, an employee’s normative commitment.4. ResultsAfter the data have been collected, their analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS 16.0, first being calculated the descrip

13、tive statistics for the two variables (Table 1). As we can observe, low scores were obtained for affective (m=16.5, S.D=2.7) and continuance commitment (m=18.3, S.D=1.9) and medium scores for normative commitment (m=24.9

14、, S.D=3.1). Regarding occupational stress, high scores were obtained on subscales like responsibility pressure (m=8.2, S.D= 2.1) and workload (m=9.0, S.D=1.4), and medium scores on subscales like quality concerns (m=5.4,

15、 S.D=1.7), role conflict (m=6.9, S.D=1.5) and job vs. non job conflict, the last subscale obtaining the lowest scores (m=4.9, S.D=2.4).Table 1. Descriptive statistics for occupational stress and organizational commitment

16、Mean Standard deviationOccupational Stress 49.5 3.7Responsibility pressure 8.2 2.1Quality concerns 5.4 1.7Role conflict 6.9 1.5Job vs. non job conflict 4.9 2.4Workload 9.0 1.4Affective Commitment 16.5 2.7Normative Commit

17、ment 24.9 3.1Continuance Commitment 18.3 1.9After reporting the descriptive statistic indicators, in view of testing the research hypotheses, Pearson correlation coefficients, presented in Table 2, were calculated. As we

18、 can observe, strong negative correlations have been obtained between occupational stress and affective commitment (r=-.561, p<0.05), and between occupational stress and continuance commitment (r=-.502, p<0.05), mo

19、derate negative correlations being obtained between occupational stress and normative commitment (r=-.390, p<0.05).Table 2. Correlation matrix for occupational stress and organizational commitmentAffective CommitmentN

20、ormative CommitmentContinuance CommitmentOccupational stress -.561* -.390* -.502*Responsibility pressure -.539* -.502* -.401*Quality concerns -.217* -.356 -.379*Role conflict -.306* -.441* -.236*Job vs. non job conflict

21、-.265* -.302* -.198Workload -.571* -.428* -.327*Having in view the subscales of the OSS, relatively strong negative correlations have been obtained between affective commitment and responsibility pressures (r=-0.539, p&l

22、t;0.05) and workload (r=-571, p<0.05) suggesting that perceived high responsibilities and workload at the workplace (composed of numerous difficult tasks with tight deadlines) are associated by the employees of the pu