版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
1、湘潭大學碩士學位論文張君勱:哲學與政治之間姓名:歐陽詢申請學位級別:碩士專業(yè):中國哲學指導教師:劉啟良20070501IIABSTRACT Centering on the question of how China realizes modernization, three political cultural ideological trends including conservatism, libe
2、ralism, and radical doctrine have appeared at the same time nearly. As Main representative in conservatism, the modern new- Confucianists object to both the radical and sticking to the establish
3、ed practice, but take the attitude of “practical innovation“. In this way, they stand fast at the Confucian’ s study in disposition justice at narrowly- defined idea culture i.e. the outlook on
4、 life, study and draw lessons from the modern western democratic system politically, and regard democracy as inherent requirement and result of dialectical development of disposition justice. It
5、39;s a pity that they have not realized study in disposition justice and political liberalism has been opposite essentially. Disposition justice is not the basic point to set up democracy. The
6、 social development fact indicates that the traditional outlook on life has already been incompatible with current era, and is detested and rejected deeply by the masses of people. The democrat
7、ic autocracy with its looks' form has also passed through many hands or places with the advanced history wheel. At the same time, the school of modern new- Confucian that advocate “holy i
8、nside opens new king outside“, has struggled for the rights to subsistence earnestly all the time. Its utopia of morals is so far still like the moon in water and flower in mirror. In addi
9、tion, according to the situation that they throw themselves into the political activity, they’ re either not to be merged into because of high justice, for instance Xiong Shili, et al. or boo
10、st autocratic dictatorship regime's arrogance because of the wrong theory’ s guidance, for instance Zhang Junmai participated in “ the false national assembly “,etc. in 1946. Among the modern
11、 new personages of the Confucianists, Zhang Junmai can call model of “not forget politics because of philosophy, not forget philosophy because of politics“. Because his core of philosophy though
12、t is the outlook on life of the free will, i.e. the Confucianists’so- called “Confucian orthodoxy“, his political theory's content is to follow the example of the modern western democratic
13、system. So this text takes the topic “between conservatism and liberalism“. For wide clearing entangled withing between the liberalism and conservatism, I divide full text into chapter four adop
14、ting the total method after dividing first: explain conservatism property and characteristic of his outlook on life in chapter one; analyze liberalism factor and inherent defect of his democratic
15、 constitutional theory in chapter two; sum up how to combine cultural conservatism and political liberalism in chapter three; pursue the reason of phenomenon that cultural conservatism and political libe
16、ralism appear compatibly from science aspect in chapter four. Take a broad view of the full text, we can see inherent contradiction nature between cultural conservatism and political liberalism,
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
評論
0/150
提交評論