“行動(dòng)生活”與“沉思生活”之間——阿倫特“政治地思考”之見(jiàn).pdf

1、蘭州大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文“行動(dòng)生活”與“沉思生活”之間——阿倫特“政治地思考”之見(jiàn)姓名：周易申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專(zhuān)業(yè)：哲學(xué)外國(guó)哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：陳春文20090501蘭州大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文“行動(dòng)生活”與“沉思生活”之間——阿倫特“政治地思考”之見(jiàn)AbstractManyphilosophershavemadethedistinctionbetween“vitaaction’’and“vitacontemplativa“SincefromPlato，

2、philosophersgenerallyagreedthat“vitacontemplativa’’isbetterthan‘‘vitaaction“Theythinkthattheformeristheactionofselfcontainedandforthepurposeofitsown；thelatterisonlyameanstoanend，whichdoesnothaveintrinsicvalueThesignifica

3、nceofArendt’Sthinkingistoreexaminethe‘‘vitaaction’’and“vitacontemplativa“shebelievedthatthinkingwasimportant，butthethinkingandtheactionarenotdecisivelyantagonisticArendtreestablishedthedignityfor“vitaaction“anddidnotSCCi

4、tasmerelyameans，butthesurvivalofhumaninadifferentwayPeoplewillfallintolostwiththelackofthinking，butwithoutaction，thesignificanceashumanwillnolongerexistOfcourse，Arendt’understandingaboutthinkingandactionwasnotinthetradit

5、ionalSCNSC，butsubvertedthedichotomyofessenceandphenomenonArendtrecognizedthedifferenceofthetwolife—styles，herwokewasjusttoclarifyAfterthetrialeventofEichmann，Arendtawaredthatpeoplereliedonideologyratherthanthinkingundert

6、heruleofhupocriticalpoliticsNotonlydowetakeactiontobuildthepublicdomain，buttothinkandjudgeThus，Arendtinhislateryearsreturnedtospirituallifeofhuman，shetriedtoexploresomekindofabridgelinking“vitaaction”and“vitacontemplativ