版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內容提供方,若內容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領
文檔簡介
1、汕頭大學碩士學位論文中外報紙5.12汶川地震報道框架比較分析姓名:高文歡申請學位級別:碩士專業(yè):新聞學指導教師:陳婉瑩200905013 Abstract This study investigated into Chinese and foreign media’s coverage of the May 12 Wenchuan earthquake, which is the worst disaster in last thirt
2、y years in China. Disaster reporting has been an important area, and this study employed news framework theory and gatekeeper theory to compare the characteristics and causes of disaster reporting among Chinese press,
3、traditional party newspaper and market newspaper, as well as national and regional newspaper This study used content analysis method and examined how major foreign newspaper like the New York Tomes, the Los Angeles Times
4、, and Chinese newspaper, like, progressive Southern Metropolis Daily, as well as local Western China Metropolis Daily cover and framed the Sichuan earthquake during the first month. This paper found that both major Chi
5、nese newspaper and American newspaper have used news framework theory in covering the disaster, like political framework, economic consequence framework, disaster framework, human interest framework, leadership framework
6、 as well as responsibility framework, but have some differences. Chinese media tend to use more straight news style and foreign press uses more analysis style in covering the earthquake, and foreign press tend to use mo
7、re political framework, responsibility framework, but Chinese press use more economic consequence, human interest and leadership framework. Thus, the study researched into the difference of the four kinds of newspaper,
8、in particular compared the difference between party newspaper and market newspaper, which revealed the characteristics of news control, reporting model as well as professionalism in transitional China. Key words: News Fr
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內容負責。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 都市報中外災難圖片報道比較研究——以《東方早報》汶川地震、東日本地震報道為例.pdf
- 唐山、汶川地震新聞報道比較研究.pdf
- 5.12汶川地震應激事件對胰島功能的影響
- 比較唐山地震與汶川地震
- 汶川地震報道的倫理追問.pdf
- 報紙公益報道比較研究
- 歷史性大跨越——唐山地震、汶川地震新聞報道比較.pdf
- 5.12汶川地震災后藏羌村落更新實踐研究
- 話語分析理論框架下的中日媒體地震報道比較研究
- 我國報紙媒體新農(nóng)村報道的框架分析.pdf
- 報紙公益報道比較研究.pdf
- 話語分析理論框架下的中日媒體地震報道比較研究.pdf
- 從汶川地震的央視報道看政治傳播
- 汶川地震建筑震害分析
- 災難報道中的人文關懷——以汶川地震報道為例.pdf
- 汶川地震報道中電視新聞特寫研究.pdf
- 香港報紙“占中”事件報道框架研究
- 報紙和微博對山東疫苗事件的報道框架建構比較.pdf
- “汶川地震”恢復期大眾媒體的新聞框架分析(20092013)
- 中國青年報汶川地震和雅安地震報道研究
評論
0/150
提交評論