版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、3800 英文單詞, 英文單詞,21500 英文字符,中文 英文字符,中文 6500 字文獻(xiàn)出處: 文獻(xiàn)出處:Masaba S, Mungai D N, Isabirye M, et al. Implementation of landslide disaster risk reduction policy in Uganda[J]. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 2
2、017, 24: 326-331.Implementation of landslide disaster risk reduction policy in UgandaSowedi Masaba, David N. Mungai, Moses Isabirye, Haroonah NsubugaAbstractGlobally, policies have been implemented to mitigate against di
3、saster risks whose frequency, severity and impact is increasing. The aim of this research was to assess the extent to which landslide disaster risk reduction policy measures have been implemented in Uganda. Primary data
4、were obtained through household surveys and key informant interviews conducted in the landslide disaster prone Mount Elgon district of Bududa in Eastern Uganda. Secondary data were collected through document review. Hous
5、ehold survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and spearman's correlation tests while key informant interview data were analyzed using content analysis. The study findings reveal that afforestation, and
6、 appropriate farming technologies and land use practices are the most implemented landslide disaster risk reduction policy measures while gazetting of landslide prone areas and prohibiting settlement in such risky areas,
7、 resettlement of people living in landslide prone areas, and enforcement of relevant laws and regulations are the least implemented. The study findings further show that awareness is the most important factor influencing
8、 implementation of landslide disaster risk reduction policy measures at household level. The study findings also reveal high institutional vulnerability to landslides, characterized by inadequate financial and human capa
9、city, political interference, misuse of resources, poor cooperation by the local community and lack of a sectoral law and this should be addressed. Future research should focus on assessing the effectiveness of early war
10、ning systems for landslide disaster risk reduction in Uganda.Keywords: Landslide; Disaster; Risk; Policy; Uganda1. IntroductionGlobally, disasters are increasing in frequency, severity and impact. Between the year 2003 a
11、nd 2013, the number of disaster events increased from 700 to 880 worldwide, affecting at least 2.9 billion people, killing more than 1.2 million and causing economic loss exceeding US$1.7 trillion [1–10]. Africa holds ha
12、lf of the world's most risk prone countries [11]. About 1700 disaster events were recorded in Africa between 1980 and 2008, affecting more than 319 million people, killing over 708,000 and causing economic loss in ex
13、cess of US$24 billion [12]. Disasters threaten development in Africa with Uganda listed among the 11 countries most at risk of disaster induced poverty in the world [13,14]. Between the year 2000 and 2005, about 66% of h
14、ouseholds experienced at least one type of disaster in Uganda [15,16]. Landslides kill more people (14%) than any other socio-natural disaster in Uganda, and affect 4% of the population [17]. The Country has experienced
15、enormous losses due to landslides (Table 1), including the March 1, 2010 landslide (Fig. 1) which was ranked among the top ten disasters by number of deaths in the world. The landslide killed 388 and affected at least 85
16、00 people in the Mount Elgon District of Bududa in Eastern Uganda [12,18–23]. Such unprecedented landslide disasters can be attributed to institutional vulnerability i.e. institutions that are either too weak to offer pr
17、otection against disaster risks or ignorant of their duty to provide safety and human security [24].2.1. Study settingBududa district is located on the south western slopes of Mount Elgon in Eastern Uganda along the Keny
18、a boarder (Fig. 2). The district lies between latitude 2°49′N(xiāo) and 2°55′N(xiāo), and longitude 340 15′E and 340 34′E. It covers a total land area of about 274 km2. The study area receives very high annual rainfall (ab
19、ove 1500 mm), is characterized by high altitude ranging between 1250 m to 2850 m above sea level, and the steep concave north-east facing slopes that coincide with the dominant rainfall direction have favoured land slidi
20、ng. With exception of the Central Bukigai zone, the study area is dominated by vertisols which are “problem soils” i.e. where slope failure can occur even without human intervention. The soils have a high amount of clay,
21、 are fine textured and highly plastic, resulting in low permeability, excessive water retention, high susceptibility to expansion and sliding. The most common types of landslides in the study area include; debris slumps,
22、 bottle slides, mudslides and sheet slides [26–36].Fig. 2. Map showing the location of Bududa District in Uganda and East AfricaBududa is a highly populated and predominantly rural district (97%). Between 2002 and 2014,
23、the population grew by 72% (Author, 2016) from 123,103 to 211,683. The population is largely distributed among households 37,028, with an average household size of 5.7 far above the national average of 4.7. The annual po
24、pulation growth rate is very high (4.52%), far above the national average of 3%. The population density is also very high (499 persons per km2) compared to the national average of 173. The population is relatively homoge
25、neous and traditional with a predominant household population of 99%, and the Bagisu or Bamasaba constitute the major ethnic group (99%). The largely traditional nature of the population makes it conservative and less wi
26、lling to accept birth control programmes or relocate to other areas. Although Mount Elgon national park covers 40% of the district, the fertile volcanic soils support intensive subsistence farming and a high population d
27、ensity. Both rapid population growth and intensive agriculture are key drivers of landslides in the study area. In terms of administrative units, Bududa district has one town council, 15 sub- counties, 36 parishes and 33
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]山體滑坡外文翻譯--烏干達(dá)實(shí)施滑坡災(zāi)害風(fēng)險(xiǎn)降低政策(英文)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]山體滑坡外文翻譯--烏干達(dá)實(shí)施滑坡災(zāi)害風(fēng)險(xiǎn)降低政策中英全
- 2017年山體滑坡外文翻譯--烏干達(dá)實(shí)施滑坡災(zāi)害風(fēng)險(xiǎn)降低政策
- 2017年山體滑坡外文翻譯--烏干達(dá)實(shí)施滑坡災(zāi)害風(fēng)險(xiǎn)降低政策.DOCX
- 2017年山體滑坡外文翻譯--烏干達(dá)實(shí)施滑坡災(zāi)害風(fēng)險(xiǎn)降低政策(英文).PDF
- ――山體滑坡氣象風(fēng)險(xiǎn)預(yù)報(bào)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]外文翻譯--滑坡和洪水對(duì)公路網(wǎng)的經(jīng)濟(jì)影響
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]--外文翻譯—光纖實(shí)時(shí)監(jiān)控傳感技術(shù)在滑坡監(jiān)控中的應(yīng)用
- 基于LiDAR點(diǎn)云數(shù)據(jù)的滑坡災(zāi)害研究——以泰寧山體滑坡為例.pdf
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]外文翻譯--滑坡和洪水對(duì)公路網(wǎng)的經(jīng)濟(jì)影響(英文)
- 山體滑坡應(yīng)急處理方案
- 山體滑坡應(yīng)急處理方案
- 現(xiàn)場(chǎng)山體崩塌、山體滑坡、泥石流、滾石災(zāi)害應(yīng)急處置方案。
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]--外文翻譯—光纖實(shí)時(shí)監(jiān)控傳感技術(shù)在滑坡監(jiān)控中的應(yīng)用(譯文)
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]外文翻譯--滑坡和洪水對(duì)公路網(wǎng)的經(jīng)濟(jì)影響中英全
- 基于LiDAR點(diǎn)云數(shù)據(jù)的滑坡災(zāi)害研究——以泰寧山體滑坡為例_3324.pdf
- 突發(fā)山體滑坡 如何逃生避險(xiǎn)
- 山體滑坡綜合治理工程監(jiān)理實(shí)施細(xì)則
- 富春江電廠山體滑坡分析
- 山體滑坡監(jiān)控預(yù)警完整系統(tǒng)
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論