WTO爭(zhēng)端解決報(bào)告對(duì)內(nèi)國(guó)法律之影響.pdf

1、湖南師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文WTO爭(zhēng)端解決報(bào)告對(duì)內(nèi)國(guó)法律之影響姓名：嚴(yán)蓉申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專(zhuān)業(yè)：法學(xué)國(guó)際法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：王貴國(guó)20060501Abstracts、斫thten—yearhistory’WT0disputesettlementsystemhasbeenconsideredasthemostimportantpartoftheWT0Duringthisperiod，WTOmembershaVebroughtoVer300dispu

2、testoDSB，andmostofthedisputeshavebeensolVedthrou曲consultations，panelorappellateprocedures，andDSBhasadopted95panelreportsand65appenatereportsThen，WhatisthelegalstatusofthesereportstoWT0membersandsubsequentcasesByusingmeth

3、odsofcomparatiVeanalysis，andcase—tocaseanalysis，thisdissertationtriestodiscusslegaleffectsofthesereportsonnationallegalsystemFirstly，仔omthepointofWT0features，mearticleillustratesme“gradualevolVement”ofGATTpowerorientatio

4、ntoWT011lleorientation，whichimproVesmemberstrustsandconfidentsonWT0disputesettlementsystemAndthisaIticlemakesaconclusionthatitisthejudicialapproachmakespoliticalfacts盯aduallyphaseoutsuchdisputesettlementsystem，andmakessu

5、chsystemprefertointe叩retationsofclausesandaimsofmeWT0treatiesthemselVes，whichmakesitpossiblefortheWT0reportstealizetheire能ctsonnationallegalsystemFurthermore，withestablishmentsofcompulsiVejurisdictionandimplementationofr

6、eports，suchpossibilitybecomestoakindofinevitabilityAtthesametime，withacomparatiVeanalysisbetweentheWT0，ICJandNAFTA，meauthorpoints‘outnotonlyonthecoVerageofjurisdiction，butonthecompulsiVemeansofimplementationofreports，the

7、fomeriswiderandstrongerthanthelatertwoThen，throughananalysisoftheWT0treaties’clauses，itfurtherprovestheineVitabilityofsuche8’ectsonnationallegalsystemTheauthorconsiders，withtheestablishmentofthep“ncipleof“defactostaredec