從新馬填海案看ITLOS臨時措施.pdf

1、廈門大學碩士學位論文從新馬填海案看ITLOS臨時措施姓名：楊春曉申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：國際法學指導教師：傅崐成20090401AbstractAbstractThelandreclamationcaseconcerningSingaporeandMalaysiaisthefourthcaseacceptedbytheinternationaltribunalforthelawofthesea(ITLOS)，regardingprovi

2、sionalmeasures，whichisalsothefirstcaseintheinternationallawwhichsubmittedtoatllirdpartysettlementmechanismbytwoadjacentcountriesconcerninglandreclamationactivitiesThoughithasbeenforover5yearsfromprescribingprovisionalmea

3、suresbytheinternationaltribunalforthelawoftheseapapersconcerningsystemicresearchonthiscaseremainsverylimitedinOurdomesticacademiccommunityaccordingtotheauthor’SavailablematerialInasense，it’Saninnovationofthispaperbutitis

4、onlyoneaspectofthematter，forontheotheraspect，itisalsoadisadvantageforthisarticlebecauseoflackofrelatedmaterialThroughanalysisofthecasethoroughlyontheonehand，theauthortrytoconductamoreindepthstudyontheprovisionalmeasuresb

5、eforetheinternationaltribunalforthelawoftheseaand，ontheotherhand，inviewofOurreclamationprojectsareproceedinginalargescalearoundthewholecountryandfurthermore，thewholecountryseemstosetoffanewwaveoflandreclamationactivities

6、，theauthorhopesthatwecouldlearnlessonsfromthelandreclamationcaseinordertoniptroubleinthebudwhenfacingthesanledispute。Theprefacefirstlysimplynarratelandreclamationactivitiesaroundtheworldaswellasit’Snegativeimpactontheeco

7、logicalenvironment，secondlytheauthorpointsthatthecombinationofWorldwidelandreclamationactivitiesandthenegativeimpactoflandreclamationcouldeasilyleadstoadisputebetweencountriesadjacentonthisissue，justlikethefamouscase，cas

8、econcerninglandreclamationbetweenSingaporeandMalaysianlispaperconsistsofthreechaptersinadditiontoPrefaceandConclusionsChapteroneanalysisthefoundingandcompulsoryjurisdictionoftheinternationaltribunalforthelawoftheseaandth

9、egeneralissueofit’Sprovisionalmeasures，andthroughacomparisonbetweenprovisionalmeasuresbeforeinternationalcourtofjustice(ICJ)andtheinternationaltribunalforthelawofthesea，theauthorintendtogetabetterunderstandingoftheprovis