《列朝詩集》選評“李何”、“李王”研究_33394.pdf

1、華中師范大學碩士學位論文《列朝詩集》選評“李何”、“李王”研究姓名：滿濤申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：古代文學指導教師：譚邦和20100501⑨碩士擘位論文MASTER‘STHESlSAbstractClassicpoemscameintoappearanceandtendedtobeincreasinglyactiveinthefieldofpoetryinthemidistofTangDynasytThecampaignofRenaiss

2、enceinliteraturetheSevenadvocatedmadesubstantiveinfluenceinthefieldofthepoetryandartLi，He，Li，Wang，therepresentativesoftheSeven，rcexploredthedevelopmentofliteratureunderthebannerofrenaissenceTheycontendedthat”excellentpro

3、sesbelongstoQinandHan，andpoetrytotheprimeofTang“Also，theyadvocatedthereconstructionofthetheoryofliterature，andtheconstructionofartialsystem，aswellasthefolkliteratureTheyhowever，slipedbackintotheconditionofbackwardness：th

4、us，theproblemconcerningthepartoftheoryandpracticeexistedinthecomposition，andtheyarecriticizedbytheoffspringAfterwards，theschoolofGongan，TangSong，andJinglinswarmedintothetideofcriticismLieChaoPoetryasallmostimportantpoetr

5、ywrittenbyQianqianyi，embodiedhiscriticismaboutthetideofpoetryrenaissence，representedbytheSevenasawholeRegardingLieChaoPoetrytheauthorfindoutthatthereiSstillmuchspaceleftforUStomakeallthoroughstudyofit。Judgingbythecomment

6、OntheTheSeven’SpoetrymadebyQianqianyi，theauthoristomakealldeeperanalysisonhiscommentandhispersonalconceptinvolvedinitThethesismainlydiscussesaboutthecommentinLiechaoPoetrymadebyQianqianyiontheLille，LiWangThefourperson，as

7、representativeswerediscussedinMinghistorywhichconsiderablyshowstheirstatusandinfluenceintherenaissencemovementofMingDynastyBycomparingthefourperson’SpoetryandLieChaopoetrythethesisistostudythecriticismmadebyQianqianyiabo

8、utthepoetryinrenaissencemovement，andmakeancommentontheQianqianyi’SideasofpoetryBasedonthoseideas，thethesisistostudythesubstantiveinfluencesLieChaopoetrymadeonthepoetryofMingDynastyKeywords：CompilledHoLiLiWangSelectedComm