2023年全國碩士研究生考試考研英語一試題真題(含答案詳解+作文范文)_第1頁
已閱讀1頁,還剩9頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡介

1、<p><b>  外文翻譯</b></p><p><b>  原文1</b></p><p>  The work values of first-year college students: exploring group differences</p><p>  A sample of 3,570 fi

2、rst-year college students were surveyed regarding the factors they deemed most important to their long-term career choice. Students as a whole identified intrinsic interest, high salary, contributions to society, and pre

3、stige as their 4 most important work values. Additional analyses found men more likely to espouse extrinsic values, women more likely to espouse social values, and students from median parental-income groups more likely

4、to espouse intrinsic values. In light of</p><p>  Author: Duffy. Ryan D,Sedlacek. William E </p><p>  Nationality: USA</p><p>  Originate from: College studen

5、ts (Surveys)Career development 2007(4), 89–100</p><p><b>  譯文1</b></p><p>  大一學(xué)生的職業(yè)價值觀:探索他們的差異</p><p>  對一個樣本為3,570個大一學(xué)生進行了調(diào)查,他們認(rèn)為最重要的因素是其長期的職業(yè)選擇。學(xué)生整體的內(nèi)在的興趣、薪水高、對社會的貢獻(xiàn)和

6、信譽是他們認(rèn)為最重要的4個工作價值觀。更多的分析發(fā)現(xiàn),男性更加在乎外在價值,女性更傾向于社會價值觀,而那些來自中層收入的學(xué)生更加看重內(nèi)在價值。根據(jù)這些結(jié)果顯示,輔導(dǎo)員都鼓勵學(xué)生注重職業(yè)價值觀決策過程中的扮演的角色。</p><p>  幾個著名的職業(yè)發(fā)展理論家們已經(jīng)認(rèn)識到,職業(yè)價值觀在職業(yè)咨詢和職業(yè)生涯決策過程中發(fā)揮重要作用(Dawis, 2001; Holland, 1997; Super, 1980)。職業(yè)價

7、值觀是指一個人想離開該工作時,該工作中影響他們工作滿意度的因素(Dawis, 2001; Elizur, 1984)。職業(yè)價值觀被視為大學(xué)生生涯輔導(dǎo)過程中的關(guān)鍵(Luzzo, 2000)。然而,實證研究表明學(xué)院學(xué)生的職業(yè)價值觀被限制于職業(yè)技能和興趣。此外,一些特定群體的學(xué)生,比如那些處在第一個職業(yè)生涯關(guān)鍵時刻的學(xué)生,已經(jīng)收到了令人吃驚的關(guān)注。因此,本研究的目的是探索大一學(xué)生的職業(yè)價值觀,以確定不同性別、種族、父母的收入和教育抱負(fù)的特點,

8、并探究如何將產(chǎn)生的結(jié)果用于職業(yè)輔導(dǎo)。</p><p>  研究特殊群體的職業(yè)價值觀的差異往往集中在性別,文化,種族。大量研究發(fā)現(xiàn),男性一般最求威望,責(zé)任,比女性扮演更重要角色。相反,女性更容易傾向社會價值,如幫助他人,比例高于男人 (Abu-Saad & Isralowitz, 1997; Elizur, 1994; Perrone, Sedlacek, & Alexander, 2001; Si

9、ngh, 1994)。在數(shù)量有限的研究中,職業(yè)價值觀的差異有種族而不同也被認(rèn)證了。黑種人的學(xué)生往往更注重外在和威望導(dǎo)向的價值觀,而白種人學(xué)生趨向于社會價值觀,白種人中的男性的職業(yè)價值觀傾向于經(jīng)濟報酬和工作保障(Carter, Gushue, & Weitzman, 1994; Johnson, 2002)。鑒于之前的研究,我們會假設(shè)職業(yè)監(jiān)制關(guān)會有顯著的性別差異和種族差異,男性和黑人學(xué)生更容易注重外在價值,而女性和白人學(xué)生更有可能

10、支持社會價值觀。我們還研究了職業(yè)價值觀受父母的收入和教育抱團等因素的差異。</p><p>  研究對象為一所大西洋沿岸中部大學(xué)的3570名大一學(xué)生。在受試者中,2124(59.1%)是白種人,371(10.3%)是非裔美國人,478(13.3%)是亞裔美國人和189(5.3%)是拉丁裔。有幾乎同等數(shù)量的男性(1,782,50%)和女性(1,788,50%)。男人可能會更容易接收消息,加強外在導(dǎo)向的目標(biāo),如高預(yù)期

11、收益,而女性可能更社會化進入職業(yè)生涯相關(guān)的工作價值觀與人們的工作和對社會的貢獻(xiàn)。同樣,學(xué)生的父母有低于或高于平均收入的消極和積極影響工資的家庭環(huán)境,因此可能是受到了更多的外在導(dǎo)向的目標(biāo)。 </p><p>  作者:Duffy. Ryan D,Sedlacek. William E </p><p><b>  國籍:美國</b></p><

12、p>  出處:大學(xué)生職業(yè)發(fā)展調(diào)查,2007(4), 第89–100頁</p><p><b>  原文2</b></p><p>  Professional Values and the Allure of the Market</p><p>  Students As Consumers</p><p>  

13、Students first became consumers when what became known as Pell Grants were initiated in the early 1970s. The grants gave student-aid money to students rather than to institutions, creating what was in effect a national v

14、oucher system. The idea behind the grants was that students would behave like rational economic actors and search for the best educational bargain, forcing institutions of higher education to compete with one another for

15、 students and making the system more efficient. As state res</p><p>  When universities think of students as consumers, they "package" themselves to entice students. The registrar becomes the head

16、of enrollment management, concerned with bringing in the first-year class, and registration staff increases as that function becomes more important. Institutions spend large sums on recruitment, sending glossy viewbooks

17、selling the "college experience" to students who have the right zip codes, that is, those corresponding with neighborhoods where parents are likely to ha</p><p>  If students are consumers, they ar

18、e also a captive market. Administrators are doing away with subsidized dorm food services and treating student unions like profit centers, leasing space to nutritionally questionable food chains. Many universities have t

19、urned their bookstores over to Barnes and Noble. And some issue students institutional credit cards with cute names, enabling students to purchase everything sold by the institution, even when cheaper options exist not f

20、ar off campus. In short, s</p><p>  As consumers, students no longer see themselves as apprentices who come to the university to sit at the feet of distinguished scholars and enjoy learning for its own sake.

21、 Instead, they feel compelled to maximize their investment in education, and they migrate to high-end professional colleges or preprofessional (law and medicine) programs. The liberal arts has lost students, and it depen

22、ds more and more for enrollments on required general education courses and electives, often taught by less ex</p><p>  Money is also transforming graduate education, drawing students into fields promising im

23、mediate financial rewards. Because of competition for entry into programs in medicine, law, and business, and the high rates of return that accrue to degrees from them, institutions have started to charge higher tuition

24、in these programs than in others. Enticing graduate students into the physical and biological sciences remains difficult, because these fields still demand arduous apprenticeships. Foreign nat</p><p>  In re

25、cent years, corporate funding for university research, which has consequences for graduate students, has increased rapidly. Often, corporations require professors to sign agree-ments that allow the corporations to review

26、 any articles or presentations that come out of a sponsored project. The corporations reserve the right to prevent communication of research if they believe publication or discussion will be prejudicial to their intellec

27、tual property rights. Although corporate sponsors rarel</p><p>  By law, scientific discoveries that are published cannot be patented afterward. Graduate students perform the bench science in most discoverie

28、s and are often named on patents. A federal appeals court ruled that placing a dissertation on a library shelf constitutes publication; ergo, dissertations are sometimes delayed. Secret research, once associated with the

29、 military and banned from many campuses, has unobtrusively re-entered many universities by way of corporate sponsorship of research.</p><p>  Moreover, as professors work with corporate sponsors, they begin

30、to redefine the nature of graduate student research. Students with corporate stipends frequently have to meet tight corporate deadlines. Although professors say they try to accept corporate funds only for "interesti

31、ng" and "publishable" projects, such research often has commercial applications. Rather than exploring the endless frontiers of knowledge, graduate students and their professors search for products suitabl

32、e for the globa</p><p>  Author: George Soros </p><p>  Nationality: USA</p><p>  Originate from:Academe: Magazine of the AAUP, 2001(10), 167–182</p><p><b>  譯文2&

33、lt;/b></p><p>  職業(yè)價值觀和市場吸引力</p><p><b>  學(xué)生作為消費者</b></p><p>  作為消費者,學(xué)生不再把自己當(dāng)做學(xué)徒,坐在著名學(xué)者的旁邊,享受學(xué)習(xí)的樂趣。相反,他們覺得必須把他們的教育投資最大化,遷移到高端職業(yè)院?;蚵毲绊椖浚ǚ珊歪t(yī)學(xué))。文科生越來越少,這是因為招生越來越多需要通識教育課程

34、和選修課程,這往往需要支付更高費用的教師來教授。</p><p>  錢也是研究生觀念轉(zhuǎn)變的原因,學(xué)生都進入有直接經(jīng)濟回報有前途的領(lǐng)域。因為在一些高回報率的專業(yè):醫(yī)學(xué)、法律、商業(yè)中,機構(gòu)已開始收取比其他專業(yè)較高的學(xué)費。做非常受歡迎的物理和生物科學(xué)的研究生仍然是困難的,因為這些領(lǐng)域需要具有艱苦意志的學(xué)生。外籍人士填補超過一半的地方在這些領(lǐng)域,盡管許多研究生在科學(xué)和工程獲得更高的津貼的學(xué)生相比,在非科學(xué)領(lǐng)域,并且經(jīng)常

35、得到資金從合同和贊助商,使他們的收入相當(dāng)于助理教授的“窮人”字段。</p><p>  近年來,企業(yè)資助大學(xué)研究,這將會影響研究生以致數(shù)量有了迅速增長。通常,企業(yè)需要教授簽署同意差事,允許公司審查任何文章或報告,走出一個贊助的項目。企業(yè)有權(quán)阻止通信的研究如果他們相信出版物或討論將危害他們的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)。盡管企業(yè)贊助商很少行使這些權(quán)利,因為擔(dān)心一些研究生無法及時完成論文。</p><p>  換

36、言之,企業(yè)追求利潤,管理者尋求機構(gòu)收入是通過教授等大學(xué)資源來實現(xiàn)的。(研究生往往忽略了一些創(chuàng)新活動,因為大學(xué)將他們定義為員工,并推而廣之,他們只是做一些雇傭工作,具有諷刺意味的是,大學(xué)對研究生進行分類后,他們會因為集體問題而吵架)。因此,公司是一把雙刃劍,雖然公司可能是巨人的管理者和教授。</p><p>  在后現(xiàn)代的二十一世紀(jì),職業(yè)價值觀,一旦標(biāo)志著企業(yè)和大學(xué)之間的邊界顯得古樸,就不可能天真。然而,教授和管理

37、者如果要繼續(xù)獲得公眾的信任和資金支持,他們必須區(qū)分自己的企業(yè)世界,找出一個新的社會契約。這樣的合同不會投降的市場,也不會簡單地維護舊的系統(tǒng)。教師們要保持專業(yè)以外的市場空間,將全身心地投入到了這樣的合同,并爭取管理員,學(xué)生和市民的支持。這樣的一個項目將是一項集體努力,也許一組教授作為教授,如AAUP,美國教師聯(lián)合會和全國教育協(xié)會,以及在學(xué)術(shù)和專業(yè)的社會。在某些時候,管理的協(xié)會,如美國大學(xué)協(xié)會,美國的學(xué)院和大學(xué)協(xié)會和美國教育理事會,將有包括

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評論

0/150

提交評論