利用bvi公司逃債實(shí)例研究—從反向法人格否認(rèn)的視角

1、利用BVI公司逃債實(shí)例研究—從反向法人格否認(rèn)的視角(申請清華大學(xué)法律碩士專業(yè)學(xué)位論文)培養(yǎng)單位：法學(xué)院申請人：朱穎指導(dǎo)教師：朱慈蘊(yùn)教授二○一二年三月目錄II目錄第1章案情介紹.....................................................11.1案情簡介........................................................................

2、....................................11.2詳細(xì)案情............................................................................................................11.3基本分析............................................................

3、................................................3第2章太和投資與利是通公司是否是空殼公司？—“反向揭開”的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)問題.52.1反向否認(rèn)能否參照正向否認(rèn)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)？............................................................52.2人格混同.................................................

4、...........................................................52.2.1財(cái)務(wù)混同....................................................................................................62.2.2人員混同.........................................

5、...........................................................62.2.3業(yè)務(wù)混同....................................................................................................62.3過度控制...........................................

6、.................................................................72.4公司形骸化........................................................................................................7第3章能否讓殼公司為股東承擔(dān)責(zé)任？—外部反向法人格否認(rèn)的核心.......93.1

7、法理分析............................................................................................................93.1.1支持反向法人格否認(rèn)的觀點(diǎn)....................................................................93.1.2反對反向法人格否認(rèn)的觀點(diǎn)....

8、................................................................93.1.3本案具體案情的適用..............................................................................103.2現(xiàn)行法分析.....................................................

9、.................................................133.2.1《公司法》第二十條第一款..................................................................133.2.2國稅總局[2009]698號文件第六條.......................................................133.2

10、.2《企業(yè)改制規(guī)定》第六條，第七條......................................................143.2.3《民法通則》中的誠實(shí)信用原則，禁止權(quán)利濫用原則......................143.3讓孫公司直接承擔(dān)責(zé)任是否太冒險(xiǎn)？..........................................................153.3.1讓孫公司承擔(dān)責(zé)任有充足

11、的理由..........................................................153.3.2不果斷否認(rèn)將會(huì)鼓勵(lì)更多逃債新花樣出現(xiàn)..........................................17第4章我國法人格否認(rèn)制度能否適用于殼公司？—BVI公司的準(zhǔn)據(jù)法問題...194.1依據(jù)《涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法》第十四條可適用中國法......................19

12、4.2適用該條存在“法不溯及既往”的障礙嗎？..............................................194.2.1當(dāng)新法彌補(bǔ)了法律空白時(shí)，可以參照適用新法..................................204.2.2當(dāng)新法更有利于保護(hù)法益時(shí)可以適用新法..........................................20第5章財(cái)產(chǎn)保全和執(zhí)行程序中能否查封海逸酒店？

13、—法人格否認(rèn)的適用程序225.1財(cái)產(chǎn)保全和執(zhí)行程序中不應(yīng)適用法人格否認(rèn)制度......................................225.1.1實(shí)體問題必須在審判程序中解決..........................................................225.1.2法人格否認(rèn)更需要完善的審判程序............................................