版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進(jìn)行舉報或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、湘潭大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文證實(shí)主義經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論的哲學(xué)思考姓名:梁利民申請學(xué)位級別:碩士專業(yè):馬克思主義哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:張建民20070501IIABSTRACT The scientific philosophy has profound and important influence on the western economic methodology. The discussion of the methodology of econom
2、ics in this paper is the usage of scientific philosophy in the economics, and positivism is the typical form of the scientific philosophy, becoming the philosophical foundation of the verificationism’s economic methodolo
3、gy doubtlessly. The positivist thought the philosophy should be limited to experience, should abandon “metaphysics“, the empirical confirmation of knowledge should be the epistemological central problem, should concentra
4、te on the empirical revivification of the theory. Its theories and methods had greatly influenced on the verificationism’s economic methodology, then promoted the development of the symbolic economics and the econometric
5、s, and also caused the loss of the economic humanistic spirit. From John·Mill, Cairnes, Keynes to Robbins, the verificationism’s economic methodology had walked through the glorious process, and they had expatiated
6、on the verificationism’s economic methodology elaborately well. In this process, “The problem of Mill“ was always an obstacle that couldn’t be surmounted to the verificationism’s economic methodology. The empirical fact
7、didn't match with the economic theory obviously, and the difficulty which the economic theory was verified had brought the verificationism’s economic methodology an unprecedented challenge. The verificationism’s econ
8、omic methodology isn't to do a judgment to the mistake or correctness of the theory, but to look for the scope and boundary for the usage of theory. Speaking from the essence, it is a kind of defensive method that pu
9、ts importance on the explanatory function of the economic theory, but neglects its estimative function. “The problem of Hume“ made the rationality of the inductive method oppugned, the foundation of the credible knowled
10、ge agitated; “The hay cutter of Hume“ made the verificationism’s economic methodology keep off the ethical value’s judgment more and more, and the economics lack humanistic concern; the principle of verification had lim
11、itations and the logic mistake too. The above reasons made the complete verification of the economic theory to be a dream. As the falsificationism appeared, the comedown of the verificationism’s economic methodology was
12、already an irresistible trend. In fact, as long as we bring in Marx's standpoint of practice, the above problems can be resolved satisfactorily; Practice has the firsthand advantage of reality and the dialectical cha
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 證實(shí)主義經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論的哲學(xué)思考.pdf
- 對“經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論”的幾點(diǎn)思考
- 對“經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論”的幾點(diǎn)思考
- 證偽主義與經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論.pdf
- 歐洲經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)認(rèn)識方法論的哲學(xué)背景分析
- 科學(xué)哲學(xué)對經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論影響的實(shí)證研究.pdf
- 實(shí)證主義經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論生成與演進(jìn).pdf
- 關(guān)于未來經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)理論及其方法論的哲學(xué)思考.pdf
- 實(shí)驗(yàn)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論探析.pdf
- 應(yīng)用經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論問題研究
- 法律經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論批判.pdf
- 行為經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的方法論研究.pdf
- 演化經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的方法論探析.pdf
- 法律經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論研究.pdf
- triz理論方法論的哲學(xué)思考
- 論穆勒經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論發(fā)展之路.pdf
- 科斯經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論研究.pdf
- TRIZ理論方法論的哲學(xué)思考.pdf
- 教育經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論研究.pdf
- 流通理論研究的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)方法論基礎(chǔ)
評論
0/150
提交評論