專利侵權(quán)判定等同原則研究.pdf

1、專利侵權(quán)判定等同原則研究—關(guān)于汪思銳訴劉偉平、浙江春天門業(yè)有限公司專利侵權(quán)案件的思考ThesamePrineiPlesofPatentinfringement一一一AboutWangS加1v’LiuW七iPing，ZhejiangSP血9DoCo.，Lul.ofPatentinfringementeases學(xué)位申請人:年級:學(xué)科專業(yè):研究方向:指導(dǎo)教師:定稿時間:2007王j2010年10AbstractAbstraetWithChin

2、a，5rapideeonomiedeveloPment，theinereasingnumberofPatentin伍ngementdisPutes.WhentheCourtinsucheases，esPeeiallyftheProminentPlaeethesamePrinciPle.HoWthePatentaPPlicationtodeterminewhetherthedoctrineofequivalentsin角ngement，i

3、ntheequalaPPlicationofthePrinciPle，howtobalancebetweenPatentholdersandthePublicinterest，15aquestionyettobeclarified.UNdemandsfthedeveloPmentoftheChineselegalsystemhelPful.Thesemeasuresinclude:hanonizationoflegislationimP

4、rovethesamePrineiPlesaPPlytosPeeifiecriteria:setuPasPeeialPatenteourtofseeondinstance，thejudicialProteetionoftheunityofthetrialstrictelaimsinwnting，toeliminatetheuneertaintyonthesamePrineiPleaPPliestoextemalfactorsimProv

5、ethequalityofjudges，anaecurategrasPoftheapPlieationofthedoetrineofequivalents.Thisarticle15dividedintofivechaPters:ThefirstchaPterThesecondchapter15atyPiealcaseofthedoctrineofequivalentsanalysis:thirdchaPterofthesamePrin

6、eiPlesofPatentin伍ngementintheuseoftrialPractiee，includingthesPecificcriteria叩PliedbytheCourtofChinaandthemainProblemsfourthCtheanalysisofthePatentsysteminsomecountriesabroad，anumberofsuggestionsafterSuggestionsChapterVSu

7、mmaryandOutlook.This15animPortantinnovation15aPatentattomey，5PersPective，startingfromthet沖icalease，the’，認(rèn)厄119SiruivLiuW己iPing，ZhejiangSPringDoIndustryCo.，Ltd.Patentin創(chuàng)ngementcase，，astheresearehtoanalyZethelegalProblemoft