民事訴訟電子證據(jù)初探.pdf_第1頁(yè)
已閱讀1頁(yè),還剩45頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、湘潭大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文民事訴訟電子證據(jù)初探姓名:陸康彪申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專(zhuān)業(yè):法律·民事訴訟法指導(dǎo)教師:李蓉20080420II Abstract Evidence is the core of civil litigation, also is the first factor in prosecution in all cases, if there is no evidence, that it is unable to

2、confirm the facts. However, with the rapid development and extensive application of the information technology, people have a profound understanding of the convenience of the high-tech in human life, the traditional way

3、of life is changing. In the area of litigation, the traditional legislative provisions about evidence can not fully cover the new forms, so comes the concept of electronic evidence. This paper aims to define the electron

4、ic evidence and discuss the attribute, collection, the rules and probative force of the evidence. Electronic evidence is shown in electronic form, can prove the material facts of the case. Compared with the traditional f

5、orms of evidence, electronic evidence is advanced by its high-tech, precision, fast transmission, and other advantages, but is also susceptible to tampering and destruction. China's three major procedural laws made s

6、pecific provisions of evidence, but without any provisions about the information stored in electronic equipment except the audio-visual materials. Therefore, it is necessary to make accurate position for electronic evide

7、nce, make specific provisions on the adoption of electronic evidence and probative force to guide judicial practice. Through Accessing to the foreign material especially the Code of Civil Procedure and Evidence Act conce

8、rned electronic evidence in Germany, Britain, the United States and Canada, also the relevant cases in Britain, the United States and other countries, made deep study to the source of rules of evidence in Britain and the

9、 United States, completely elucidate the breakthrough of electronic evidence to the best evidence rule and the hearsay rule. Although China's current legislation did not clearly defined the electronic evidence, but f

10、rom the “Contract Law“ and the judicial interpretation by Supreme People's Court, Supreme People's Procuratorate, Ministry of Public Security and the Ministry of Justice, we can vaguely find the individual provis

11、ions of electronic evidence. Electronic evidence is one form of the evidence in a lawsuit, has its unique content and form, like the traditional evidence, the electronic evidence also has relevance probative and play an

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論