我國寬帶壟斷與寬帶發(fā)展相關法律問題的研究.pdf

1、安徽財經大學碩士論文 我國寬帶壟斷 國寬帶壟斷與寬帶 寬帶發(fā)展 發(fā)展 相關 相關法律問題 法律問題的研究 摘 要 《反壟斷法》出臺三年多來，反壟斷領域一直很平靜，鮮有因此受到處罰甚至審查的典型案例，2011 年 11 月 9 日央視的一則報道似乎將改變這一切。該報道稱：日前，國家發(fā)改委已就寬帶接入問題對中國電信和中國聯(lián)通兩家運營商展開了反壟斷調查；如果事實成立，該兩家運營商可能被處以幾億到幾十億元的巨額罰款!一石激起千層浪。各界對發(fā)改委

2、的此番舉動一片嘩然，認為： 《反壟斷法》的“達摩克利斯之劍”終于懸在了央企的頭頂上， “中國反壟斷第一案”已經橫空出世。 正是基于此案的重要性， 本文從了解寬帶市場的現(xiàn)狀出發(fā)， 結合宏觀經濟調控相關法律制度和當前政府出臺的寬帶接入層面的反壟斷舉措，嘗試性地對寬帶壟斷的相關法律問題進行了一些研究。以期探索與發(fā)現(xiàn)寬帶市場與寬帶發(fā)展中應當遵循的一些基本規(guī)律，從而為我國的寬帶發(fā)展建立一個與之相配套的規(guī)范體制。 本文在內容方面分為五部分： 第一部

3、分， 介紹了當前寬帶反壟斷調查事件的相關背景， 分析了事件出現(xiàn)的原由， 闡述了寬帶發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀和發(fā)展趨勢，為了解論文的脈絡提供了一個鋪墊；第二部分，描述了寬帶壟斷的幾種形式， 剖析了寬帶壟斷形成的原由因及其存在的合理性， 目的在于澄清 “凡是壟斷都應該反” 的公眾認識誤區(qū)； 第三部分，就“ISP 接入市場的是否存在價格歧視”和“終端用戶的速率與資費是否合理” 幾個關鍵法律問題進行了解讀， 期望還原當前 “寬帶壟斷”問題的本來面目； 第四部分

4、， 總結了當前寬帶發(fā)展的規(guī)范體制存在的問題，證明我寬帶發(fā)展較發(fā)達國家落后其實是有原因的；第五部分，對寬帶壟斷和寬帶寬帶發(fā)展進行了幾點思考，提出了“1+1+1”調控模式、進一步改革電信業(yè)等新觀點，為我國寬帶的規(guī)范運營、有效監(jiān)管、高速發(fā)展及可持續(xù)演進做了一次全方位的管理體制設計。 關鍵詞 關鍵詞：寬帶壟斷，價格歧視， “1+1+1”模式，國家寬帶戰(zhàn)略我國寬帶壟斷與寬帶發(fā)展相關法律問題的研究

5、 ABSTRACT THE RELATEDLEGAL ISSUES OF CHINA'S BROADBAND MONOPOLY AND DEVELOPMENT ABSTRACT Since “Anti-monopoly law“ was promulgated three years ago, few typical cases in the area of antitrust have appeared, but the s

6、ituation seems to be changed wholly by a report from CCTV in the November 9, 2011. The report said: Recently, The National Development and Reform Commission has launched an antitrust investigation into China Telecom and

7、China Unicom for the issue of broadband access; if the facts prove to be true, the two operators may be sentenced to hundreds of millions to billions of huge fine. The news made a big splash, the move touched off a publi

8、c uproar from all walks of life, they said: “the sword of Damocles“ of “antitrust laws“ is hanging on the top of the heads of the central enterprises, “The first China's anti-monopoly case” has turned out. Based on t

9、he importance of the case, with the combination of the legal system related to the macroeconomic regulation and the antitrust measures on the level of broadband access taken by the government, this article proceeds from

10、the understanding of the broadband market's status quo, tries to do some researches on the legal issues related to broadband monopoly, with expectation of exploring and discovering some basic rules which should be fo

11、llowed by the broadband market and broadband development and establishing a matching regulation system. This article is divided into five parts: The first part introduces the background of the broadband antitrust investi

12、gation, analyzes the causes of the event and illuminates the broadband development status and trend, which paves a way for understanding the thought line of the article; The second part describes the forms of broadband

13、 monopoly, analyzes the causes of and the rationality of the broadband monopoly, and clarifies that “any monopoly should be against “ is a public misunderstanding; The third part explains “ whether there is a phenomenon