從藝術(shù)審美看楊春時的超越美學(xué)思想.pdf

1、分類號注1：密級注2：UDC注3：學(xué)號注4：M0901102碩士學(xué)位論文從藝術(shù)審美看楊春時的超越美學(xué)思想從藝術(shù)審美看楊春時的超越美學(xué)思想研究生姓名：周玲玲周玲玲導(dǎo)師姓名：劉承華劉承華教授教授申請學(xué)位類型碩士學(xué)科專業(yè)名稱藝術(shù)學(xué)藝術(shù)學(xué)(藝術(shù)美學(xué)藝術(shù)美學(xué)))論文提交日期20201212年4月2323日論文答辯日期20201212年5月7日學(xué)位授予單位南京藝術(shù)學(xué)院南京藝術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)位授予日期20201212年月日答辯委員會主席評閱人2012年月日I

2、IAbstractProceedingfromtherealityoftheartappreciationChunshiYangstranscendencyaesthetictheywasinspectedinthispaper.ComparingtheexamplesofartappreciationwithYangsinternaltheykernelsitisbelievedthatYang’stranscendencyaesth

3、etictheyhasgreatsignificance.Firstintermsofartmaterialchoosingcontentauthingknowledgeacceptingallheavilyrelyonhumanvita.YangsAestheticstherefechoosessubsistenceasalogicstartingpointthecategyofOntologyonstudyingtheaesthet

4、icproblemswhichisdefinitelyreasonable.SecondthepremiseofaestheticactivityisunderstingwhichcanbeonlyobtainedbytheindependenceofUtilitarianAwarenesshumanwillsothatthenatureofthewkcanbefullyshown.itisjusttheintersubjectivit

5、yemphasizedinYangstranscendencyaestheticthey.Finallythetranscendencyofthewkisthesourceofartaestheticattainment.YangsAesthetics’definingtranscendencyastheessenceofaestheticactivityissignificanttohowtoexplaintheactivityofa

6、rtappreciation.HoweverYangsaestheticshassimultaneouslylimitations.Tobeginwithitislackinginaxiologyfoundationsincetranscendingwasdirectlyconsideredastheessenceofaestheticactivity.Itmaybemeappropriatetodescribethataestheti

7、cperceptionderivedfromtheconvictionthatthesubjecthasgonebeyondhislimitationsintheactualwdwhichstillexistsinthepreviousperiod.alsoitdoesnotonlyexistinthetranscendentalfieldbutalsothereality.Seconditisoversimplifiedifinter

8、subjectivitywasconsideredastheentireprocedureofaestheticactivity.Itshouldinclude：（1）shieldourselvesfromtheactualexistencetowardsintersubjectiveexperiencingtheobject(2)drawingtheconclusionfromtheintrospectionjudgmentofexp

9、erience(3)confirmthefactthatthesubjecthas“surpassed“.ThirdYangsAestheticshasalackofanalysisonitemsguidingtheultimatevalue.Afteranalysisinthisarticleit’sbelievedthatultimatevalueisnotabletoexceedthescopeofrecentculturalhe

10、ritagealthoughitbreaksfromrealitywhichissocalledultimatevalueientatedbyculture.YangsAestheticswasviewedfromtheprospectiveofartappreciationwasevaluatedimpartiallyinthepaperwhichwouldbesignificantonprovidinganewtheyfthestu