論儒家詩教之謬.pdf

1、湘潭大學碩士學位論文論儒家詩教之謬姓名：石東申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：古代文學指導教師：楊仲義20000401AbstractBackto舶幽，“(prologueof刀把BookofSongs、iSapopularviewpointinthefieldonstudiesofTheBookofSongsnowInfactit’SakindofteamrmationaboutConfucianPoeticteachingItiSthemai

2、ntasktoproceedwithembeddedResearchonTheBookofSongsofConfucianPoeticteachingandIconsideritwasbeneathevaluateformanyfalsehoodandlimitationConfucianPoetic—teachingiSapreciseandintegratedsystem”Poetryexpressingidea”havepoint

3、edoutcharacterandaimofthepoetry；”Thetenderandgentle”and”ThoughtiSnotevil”havebuiltupprincipiaandstandardofthepoe時”Fengfwind)”havefiguredoutvalueandfunctionofthepoetryTheywereanthoritativeudgrnentofstudyofTheBookofSongsfo

4、ralongtimeButtheyhavehadgreatlocalizationifwecombinedfactsofThe肋以ofSongsrnlereisviewofmlne：”Poetryexpressingjdea”hasbeenembodiedinpartof碭gBookofSongsbut”poetryexpresssensation”hasmorebeingItexpressespoetsheartwhatreflect

5、ed”hungrymensangfood，workingmensangWOrk，amativemensanglove，bluemensang鰣er’inITlassofthepoems”Thetenderandgenile”iSakindofpoeticsfuIlofidiosyncraticaboutChineseestheticsandcoreofConfucianPoeticteachingButitsthespi血of跏￡地(p

6、mlogueofTheBookofSongs)calledforadmirationandlampoon，andthatiSnotthetraditionofTheBookofSongsItCan’texplaina11”ThoughtiSnoteviwasquite】oosewhenConfuciusjustputitforwardButConfucianscholarsofSongDynastyconstitutedfinnstan

7、dardforitIthadshackledgravelylifeoflitemtureofthepoetryandmeritoftherealityinthefoldofConfucianismdepartedoriginalmeaningof刀詒BookofSongs”Fen酊wind)”havetwomeaning：civilizeandexpostulateInviewofConlucianpoetics刀理BookofSong

8、sincarnatedsocalled”Songsonpeacealequietandioyful，andpoliticsarekind；songsontroubledtimesarecomplainingandangryandpoliticsarerandom；songsonsubjugatedanationare鰣efandrecallable，andpoliticsarehopeless”Andthat’SRealismwhich

9、peoplearepleasedt0talkaboutButsuchunderstandingisverymechanicalandnanowA1linall，althoughConfucianPoeticteachingevenexertedeffectinthehistoryonstudiesofTheBookofSongsbutdefectiSgreatafterall_So，BacktoSh／Xu(prologueof77餾Bo