墨辯影響研究_31918.pdf

1、四川師范大學碩士學位論文墨辯影響研究姓名：宋靜靜申請學位級別：碩士專業(yè)：中國古代文學指導教師：秦彥士20100419Theresearchontheinfluenceof‘。MohistDebate’’ChineseCIassicaIIiteraturespeciaIityGraduatestudent：SongJingjingInstructingadviser：QinYanshiAbstract：TheMohistSchoolreg

2、ardedas‘。thefamousdoctrine”previledforatimeinthePreQinperiod，andwasalongwiththeConfucianSch001DuringtheHanDynasty，theMohistSchoolwasgraduallyneglectedanddisappearedAthoughtherelevantresearchwasnottotallybrokenofftherehas

3、beenlackofsystematicstudyandinadequateunderstandingontheinfluenceof“MohistDebate”Startingoffwiththeinfluenceon‘‘MohistDebate“the‘‘Jing’’and’’Shuo’’in‘‘MoJing’’theargumentsheldin“WeiLiZhiDao”，andtheblockprintededitionofth

4、eMingDynasty，Itrytodoadeep—goingresearchandhopefullytoreachareasonableappraisalChapteronediscussesthehistoryof“MohistDebate’’andthedevelopmentfrom“tentheory’’to“MoJing”MoZi’Sdebateisanalysedfromthreeaspects：definingthest

5、andardofcognition，establishingaspecificwayofdebateandusingdiversemethodsfordebateInheritingMoZi’Sthought，MohistSchooloflatertimeswasdevelopedtosomeextentintheareaofdebateanddebatetheory，andalsomadeimportantcontributionto

6、thedevelopmentofthedebatetheoryinChinaThesecondandthirdchaptersaremoreimportantDrawingconclusionsfrombothbestknowndocumentsandtherecentlyunearthedrecords，chaptertwoarguestheinfluenceof“MohistDebate”O(jiān)nthebasisofthebest—kn

7、owndocuments，weanalysetheinfluenceof‘‘Jing’’，?！甋huo’’andtheiraffectonotherscholar’STherecentlyunearthedrecordsnotonlyreflecttheinfluenceof“WeiLiZhiDao“butalsomakeastrongsupplementtotheinfluenceof“MohistDebate”Chapterthre