版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、外文翻譯原文:TheEffectofSocialConfrontationonIndividuals’IntentionstoInternallyReptFraudAbstract:Fraudulentactivityisoftenfirstdiscoveredbyemployees.Gaininganunderstingofhowmeetingwiththetransgresstodiscusstheapparentfraud(“so
2、cialconfrontation”)influencesindividuals’likelihoodofreptingfraudtointernalrecipientsisparticularlyimptantfvariousstakeholdersinterestedintheearlyreptingoffraud.Usinganexperimentalapproachthisstudyprovidesevidenceontheex
3、tenttowhichunsuccessfulsocialconfrontationwithone’ssupervisregardingapparentfraudinfluencesreptingintentionstotwodifferentbutplausibleinternalreptrecipients:thesupervis’ssupervisaninternalaudit.Tobroadenthegeneralizabili
4、tyofthefindingsthestudyincludestwodifferentfraudulentacts.Inthestudyparticipantsassumetheroleofanemployeediscoveringafraudulentact.Thestudymanipulatestwobetweenparticipantsvariables:(1)thepresenceabsenceofunsuccessfulsoc
5、ialconfrontationwiththetransgresstodiscusstheapparentfraud(2)thetypeoffraudulentactthatapparentlyoccurred(misappropriationofassetsfraudulentfinancialrepting).Theresultsofthestudywereconsistentwithextendpowerrelatedtheies
6、ofwhistleblowing.Wefindthatunderunsuccessfulsocialconfrontationone’sreptingintentionstothesupervis’ssupervisarestrongerthantoaninternalaudit.Howeverreptingintentionstothesupervis’ssupervisarenotstrongerthantoaninternalau
7、ditwhensocialconfrontationdidnotoccur.Thetypeoffraudulentactdidnotinfluencetherelationbetweensocialconfrontationreptingintentions.Ourfindingssuggestthatemployeesexperiencingunsuccessfulsocialconfrontationmaybemelikelytos
8、eekoutpowerfulinternalreptrecipients.Thusauditcommitteesotherswithaninterestinfosteringinternalfraudreptingmayfindithelpfultoincludesocialconfrontationstrategiesaspartofabroaderdiscussionwithemployeesofresponsestothedisc
9、overyoffraudmakeresponsetointernalwhistleblowinglittleisknownabouttheimpactifanyofanunsuccessfulattempttodirectlystopquestionableillegalbehavi(suchasfinancialstatementfraud)oninternalwhistleblowing.Thepurposeofthispaperi
10、storepttheresultsofanexperimentalstudythatprovidesevidenceontheimpactofanunsuccessfulsocialconfrontationwithasupervisapparentlyengaginginfraudonone’sreptingintentionstotwodifferentlegitimateinternalreptrecipients.Partici
11、pantsinthecurrentstudyeveningM.B.A.studentsreceivedbackgroundinfmationaboutacompanyasinglescenariodescribingthediscoverybyanemployeeofanapparentlyfraudulentactoftheirsupervis.Inresponseparticipantsassumingtheywerefacingt
12、hesituationdescribedinthescenarioindicatedtheirreptingintentionstotwointernalreptrecipients:(1)theirsupervis’ssupervis(2)aninternalaudit.Thestudyusesabetweenparticipantsresearchdesigninwhichparticipantswereromlyassignedt
13、oacellcomposedofoneofthetwolevelsofsocialconfrontation(e.g.presentversusabsent)oneoftwotypesofapparentfraud(misappropriationofassetsfraudulentfinancialrepting).Asdiscussedmefullyinthenextsectionwedevelopatheeticalexpecta
14、tionregardingthepotentialimpactofanunsuccessfulsocialconfrontationontherelativestrengthofreptingintentionstothetwointernalreptrecipientsbasedonpowerconsiderations(DozierMiceli1985NearMiceli1995Rehgetal.2008).Howeverourst
15、udyprovidesanimptantextensiontoresearchontheroleofpowerconsiderationsonwhistleblowing.Specificallypreviousresearchconsiderstherelativepowerrelationsamongthepotentialwhistleblowerthetransgressthereptrecipientonwhistleblow
16、ing(DozierMiceli1985NearMiceli1995Rehgetal.2008).Fexamplewhistleblowingismelikelywhenthepotentialwhistleblowerhasmepowerthetransgresshaslesspower.Incontrastwecontendthatfagivensetofpowerrelationshipsapotentialrecipient’s
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- coso報(bào)告對(duì)內(nèi)部控制設(shè)計(jì)的指導(dǎo)【外文翻譯】
- 維基任務(wù)中知識(shí)貢獻(xiàn)的個(gè)人意愿和集體意愿.pdf
- 會(huì)計(jì)欺詐【外文翻譯】
- 如何防止欺詐外文及翻譯
- 公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)內(nèi)部控制的影響
- 偶然相似性對(duì)助人意愿的影響機(jī)理研究.pdf
- 預(yù)測(cè)對(duì)沖基金欺詐【外文翻譯】
- 企業(yè)文化對(duì)內(nèi)部控制的影響
- 淺談審計(jì)環(huán)境對(duì)內(nèi)部審計(jì)的影響
- ERP對(duì)內(nèi)部控制框架的影響.pdf
- 淺談企業(yè)內(nèi)部環(huán)境對(duì)內(nèi)部控制的影響
- 會(huì)計(jì)電算化對(duì)內(nèi)部控制的影響
- 公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)內(nèi)部控制的影響分析
- 公司治理對(duì)內(nèi)部控制質(zhì)量的影響研究
- 外文翻譯----審計(jì)機(jī)構(gòu)對(duì)內(nèi)控的審計(jì)意見(jiàn)對(duì)貸款決策的影響
- 公司治理對(duì)內(nèi)部控制缺陷的影響研究.pdf
- [雙語(yǔ)翻譯]外文翻譯--網(wǎng)絡(luò)口碑對(duì)品牌形象和購(gòu)買(mǎi)意愿的影響
- 員工待遇政策對(duì)內(nèi)部控制質(zhì)量的影響.pdf
- 企業(yè)內(nèi)部溝通對(duì)內(nèi)部創(chuàng)業(yè)的影響機(jī)制研究.pdf
- 被監(jiān)護(hù)人意愿實(shí)務(wù)研究.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論