mti外刊閱讀精選硅谷科技巨頭與法律的博弈

1、MTIMTI外刊閱讀精選硅谷科技巨頭與法律的博弈外刊閱讀精選硅谷科技巨頭與法律的博弈FacebookFacebookGoogleGooglearearearbitragingarbitragingthethedatadatalawslawsAsscalsoverthemisuseofpersonalinfmationproliferatedataprotectionlawsaretightenedtechnologycompaniesa

2、releapingtoasurprisingconclusion:theyarepublishers.Notalwaysofcoursebutwhenitsuitsthem.隨著濫用個人信息的丑聞激增及數(shù)據(jù)保護(hù)法被收緊，科技公司突然得出一個令人驚訝的結(jié)論：它們是出版者。當(dāng)然，并不總是，只是在對它們有利時。FacebookemphasiseditsroleasapublisherwitheditialdiscretioninaCalifn

3、iacourtlastweekinaneffttoblockalawsuitfromadeveloper.不久前，F(xiàn)acebook在加州一家法院強(qiáng)調(diào)自己是一家擁有編輯裁量權(quán)的出版者，試圖以這一策略反擊一名開發(fā)者的訴訟。GoogleattemptedsomethingevenmeaudaciousinaUKcasethisyearinvolvingthe“righttobefgotten”insearchengineresults.Itl

4、aidclaimtoanexemptionfSuchclaimssitawkwardlywiththecustomaryinsistenceofFacebookGoogleothertechplatfmsthatinFacebook’scarefulfmulationtheyarenot“thearbiterofthetruth”.YoucouldalmosthearthelegalcogsgrindinginsideMarkZucke

5、rberg’sheadasFacebook’sfoundertestifiedonthesubjecttotheUSSenateinApril“Iagreethatweareresponsiblefthecontentbutwedon’tproducethecontent.”這些主張有悖于Facebook、谷歌及其他技術(shù)平臺一貫堅(jiān)持的立場，用Facebook的謹(jǐn)慎表述來說，就是它們不是“真相的仲裁者”。今年4月，F(xiàn)acebook的創(chuàng)始人

6、馬克?扎克伯格(MarkZuckerberg)在美國參議院作證時，你幾乎能聽到他腦中法律齒輪飛轉(zhuǎn)的聲音：“我同意我們對這些內(nèi)容負(fù)有責(zé)任，但這些內(nèi)容并不是我們生產(chǎn)的。”Technologygiantsaredancingaroundthequestionofwhethertowhatextenttheyarepublishersbecauseofashiftinpublicopinion.Takinglimitedresponsibili