版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、Competitive dynamics in the Korean video platform market: Traditional pay TV platforms vs. OTT platformsJunghwan Kim a, Seongcheol Kim b,?, Changi Nam ca Internet Research Team, NAVER, Republic of Korea b School of Media
2、 and Communication, Korea University, Republic of Korea c Department of Business and Technology Management, KAIST, Republic of Koreaa r t i c l e i n f oArticle history:Received 15 January 2015Received in revised form 28
3、 April 2015Accepted 25 June 2015Available online 26 June 2015Keywords:Over-the-top (OTT)Theory of nicheVideo platform marketCompetitionTraditional pay TVa b s t r a c tNetflix is commonly referred as an over-the-top (OTT
4、) media, and it takes a role of a videoplatform changing the market. The purpose of this research is to explain the competition inKorean video platform market, in particular competition between traditional pay TV andOTT.
5、 In this study, the theory of the niche is adopted to explain the competitive dynamicsin video platform market in Korea. This theory is a unique framework to conceptualize andempirically measure the impact of new media o
6、n the old one. It explains and predicts theexistence, displacement, and extirpation of players in the ecosystem. To make up for theprevious researches, multiple resources such as gratification and time spent using mediaa
7、re measured in this study. The result indicates that the case of the Korean market wassignificantly different from the case of America, in that competition between traditionalpay TV and OTT was not severe.? 2015 Elsevier
8、 Ltd. All rights reserved.1. IntroductionNetflix, the internationally acclaimed online video platform, was nominated in six categories at the 71st Golden Globe Awards in 2013, and won the Best Performance by an Actress i
9、n a Television Drama award for House of Cards. Famous for providing video-on-demand (VOD) streaming services globally, Netflix had recently commenced producing House of Cards as its first original content title, garnerin
10、g enough attention to receive the award. Netflix uses the Internet to broadcast video content and is commonly referred to as over-the-top (OTT) media; meanwhile, HBO, a representative premium cable and satellite TV provi
11、der in the U.S., launched its own OTT service ‘‘HBO Go’’ in 2010. While both providers had forecast the changes in media usage patterns and recognized the value of Internet based services, Netflix managed to sell the sam
12、e number of paid subscriptions as HBO by October 2013. Moreover, consumers who were subscribers of pay TV platforms including cable and satellite began switching to OTT, choosing it as their main video platform; meanwhil
13、e, some subscribers downgraded their pay TV service from a premium to regular package (Banerjee et al., 2014). The former change is referred to as ‘‘cord-cutting,’’ while the latter is ‘‘cord-shaving.’’ Such changes also
14、 occurred in the Korean video platform market, whereby the growth of global and local OTT services such as ‘‘YouTube,’’ ‘‘GomTV,’’ and ‘‘PandoraTV’’ stimulated traditional TV platform providers to launch Netflix-like OTT
15、 services such as ‘‘tving’’ and ‘‘pooq.’’According to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC), an OTT is defined as an online video distributor that delivers video programming content to consumers over the Inter
16、net (FCC, 2013). In the U.S., the total number of OTThttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.0140736-5853/? 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.? Corresponding author.E-mail address: hiddentrees@korea.ac.kr (S. Kim).
17、Telematics and Informatics 33 (2016) 711–721Contents lists available at ScienceDirectTelematics and Informaticsjournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/teletelevision programming decreased as people began using digital
18、multimedia broadcasting (DMB) and smartphone applications to watch real time broadcasting, as well as user created content (UCC) and VOD content; and Kim et al. (2013) examined smartphone usage to see whether the use of
19、radio and newspaper apps resulted in a decreased usage that of traditional forms, and whether accessing the Internet and game contents on a smartphone resulted in a decreased use of PCs for the same purposes.Similar to t
20、he displacement effect, but presenting a slightly different perspective, is ‘‘functional alternative.’’ The researchers who argue in favor of functional alternative explain that the level of gratification, which depends
21、on the type of services that the medium provides, results in different media usage patterns (Cha, 2013; Dutta-Bergman, 2004; Lin, 1999, 2001; Nam and Barnett, 2010; Okazaki and Hirose, 2009). Accordingly, two media with
22、similar content usually satisfy a consumer’s motivation in the same way, resulting in a displacement effect. Cha (2013) examined the predictors of TV and online video platform use. She found that the more that consumers
23、perceive online video platforms as different from TV in terms of the way that they satisfy their needs, the more likely they will be to use online video platforms. Recently, some researchers also have been interested in
24、OTT market. Banerjee et al. (2013) utilized longitudinal survey panel data to reveal the transition among the OTT segments such as ‘‘cord loyalists’’, ‘‘non-pay TV’’, and ‘‘cord couplers’’ especially, they found age, ann
25、ual income, and race/ethnicity determine how households choose OTT segmentations. Gimpel (2015) interviewed 22 executives at key positions in the video value chain to prove big questions. The questions related to the com
26、petition between pay TV and OTT are not only belonging to America but also Europe (Baccarne et al., 2013), Latin America (Ganuza and Viecens, 2014). Lin (2001) also addressed the displacement effect between the Internet
27、and traditional media.Fidler (1997), however, argued against the existence of a perfect substitution between new and old media. Instead, he proposed that the media coevolve and coexist through transformation and the prin
28、ciple of ‘‘delayed adoption.’’ Fidler also believed that the substitution concept that was utilized in previous studies is vague, whereby the separation of functional displacement and users’ choices is unclear (Yim, 2010
29、). If Fidler is accurate, how can multi-platform usage be explained? We cannot merely conclude that new media substitutes old media, as people do not consume just one medium. Although people consume many different types
30、of media, the previous studies only focused on individual media types; therefore, an approach from an ecological perspective is needed. Furthermore, with respect to the inconsistent results from previous studies on the d
31、isplacement effect, the niche theory that is explained in the next sub-section is more useful than the prin- ciple of relative constancy for explaining the competitive dynamics of media industries.2.2. The theory of the
32、niche2.2.1. The concept of niche theoryThe theory of the niche originates from ecology and explains how an organism competes and coexists in a dynamic environment, whereby the competitive dynamics between or among other
33、populations in an ecological environment are examined (Yi and Sung, 2007). The organizations in the ecology must compete with others to survive because resources are limited. From an organizational-ecology point of view,
34、 the influence of the environment is more essential than that of internal organizational operations (Yi and Sung, 2007); consequently, it is necessary to understand how populations adapt to their environments (Hannan and
35、 Freeman, 1989).The original meaning of the term ‘‘niche’’ is ‘‘a(chǎn) suitable environment for organisms to live in,’’ but the term can also be defined as the resource usage patterns of populations (Yi and Sung, 2007). From
36、this understanding, niche theory has been adapted to explore the competition between new and older media for limited resources such as consumer satisfaction, time, space, and advertising dollars (Dimmick et al., 2004; Di
37、mmick and Rothenbuhler, 1984). In the original study that applied the theory of the niche, the authors argued that a medium depends on resources and must compete to obtain a niche, just like organisms in nature (Dimmick
38、et al., 2010). When competition occurs, the older media face the danger of exclusion, replacement, or displacement (Dimmick et al., 2004); therefore, the media must differentiate themselves across the resource categories
39、 that facilitate their survival to compete and coexist within the resource space (Dimmick et al., 2011).Researchers have adopted the theory of the niche to compare not only new media and older media (e.g. online/mobile n
40、ews vs. traditional news), but also interpersonal media and services (e.g. cell phone vs. landline vs. instant messaging vs. email vs. text messaging), as well as the competition patterns between two media. Niche theory
41、can be analyzed by applying the following three types of measures: niche breadth, niche overlap, and competitive superiority (Dimmick, 2003). Niche breadth involves measuring the area of a niche. If a medium provides a b
42、road niche range in a specific dimen- sion, then the medium is a generalist regarding resource utilization; otherwise, it is a specialist (Li, 2001). Specialists gratify a relatively limited set of motivations, whereas g
43、eneralists satisfy a broader range. For example, radio has a specific and nar- row niche breadth in local advertising, whereas national broadcast TV has a general and broad value in advertising (Dimmick and Rothenbuhler,
44、 1984). Niche overlap occurs when there is a similarity between two media in terms of their resource uti- lization patterns (Dimmick, 2003). While a high niche overlap means that the media serve the same (or similar) nee
45、ds using similar resources, a lower niche overlap indicates that different needs are being served with the use of different resources. The overlap value is an index of the substitutability or complementarity of two media
46、; therefore, a high value indicates strong competition, whereas a low value represents the opposite. Competitive superiority measures consumers’ perceptions of satisfaction toward one medium over another. A significantly
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- [雙語翻譯]在線視頻外文翻譯---韓國視頻平臺(tái)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)動(dòng)態(tài)傳統(tǒng)的付費(fèi)電視平臺(tái)和ott平臺(tái)(節(jié)選)
- [雙語翻譯]在線視頻外文翻譯---韓國視頻平臺(tái)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)動(dòng)態(tài):傳統(tǒng)的付費(fèi)電視平臺(tái)和ott平臺(tái)(節(jié)選)
- [雙語翻譯]在線視頻外文翻譯---韓國視頻平臺(tái)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)動(dòng)態(tài)傳統(tǒng)的付費(fèi)電視平臺(tái)和ott平臺(tái)中英全
- 2016年在線視頻外文翻譯---韓國視頻平臺(tái)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)動(dòng)態(tài)傳統(tǒng)的付費(fèi)電視平臺(tái)和ott平臺(tái)
- 2016年在線視頻外文翻譯---韓國視頻平臺(tái)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)動(dòng)態(tài)傳統(tǒng)的付費(fèi)電視平臺(tái)和OTT平臺(tái)(英文).PDF
- 2016年在線視頻外文翻譯---韓國視頻平臺(tái)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)動(dòng)態(tài)傳統(tǒng)的付費(fèi)電視平臺(tái)和OTT平臺(tái)(節(jié)選).DOCX
- 在線視頻的增長(zhǎng)開闊了眼界【外文翻譯】
- 外文翻譯---在線視頻的增長(zhǎng)開闊了眼界
- [雙語翻譯]外文翻譯--基于jade代理和android平臺(tái)的移動(dòng)健康研究(英文)
- videoamp-電視、視頻和新興跨屏幕平臺(tái)融合報(bào)告(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]外文翻譯--基于jade代理和android平臺(tái)的移動(dòng)健康研究
- [雙語翻譯]--外文翻譯--壓縮視頻編碼的可感知失真特性(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]--外文翻譯--基于dsp和fpga圖像采集處理系統(tǒng)平臺(tái)
- [雙語翻譯]外文翻譯--基于jade代理和android平臺(tái)的移動(dòng)健康研究(譯文)
- 網(wǎng)絡(luò)視頻和傳統(tǒng)電視的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)與融合
- 界定技術(shù)溢出和產(chǎn)品市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)【外文翻譯】
- 市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)的來源和演變【外文翻譯】
- [雙語翻譯]電視劇外文翻譯--韓國電視劇對(duì)日本游客流動(dòng)的影響(英文)
- [雙語翻譯]外文翻譯--基于一個(gè)虛擬現(xiàn)實(shí)平臺(tái)的教育旅游的研究與實(shí)現(xiàn)(英文)
- 交叉網(wǎng)絡(luò)外部性、平臺(tái)進(jìn)入與市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng).pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論