[雙語(yǔ)翻譯]食品安全外文翻譯--加強(qiáng)公眾對(duì)食品安全監(jiān)管體系的信任

1、3400 英文單詞， 英文單詞，19500 英文單詞，中文 英文單詞，中文 6000 字文獻(xiàn)出處： 文獻(xiàn)出處：Papadopoulos A, Sargeant J M, Majowicz S E, et al. Enhancing public trust in the food safety regulatory system[J]. Health Policy, 2012, 107(1):98-103.Enhancing publi

2、c trust in the food safety regulatory systemAndrew Papadopoulos, Jan M. Sargeant, Shannon E. Majowicz, Byron Sheldrick,Carolyn McKeen, Jeff Wilson, Catherine E. DeweyObjective: It is worth examining how public health ag

3、encies can enhance the public’s trust in the food safety regulatory system. This paper will focus on the food safety system, which can be defined as those involved in the safe manufacture, storage, handling, display, dis

4、tribution, sale or offer for sale, preparation, processing or service of food. Specifically, the paper will summarize and discuss literature relating to public expectation of public health agency action regarding protect

5、ing the food supply and recent policy reforms.Methods: A meta-interpretation was conducted to identify common themes in peer- reviewed publications and media sources. Literature searches retrieved 39 relevant articles pu

6、blished, resulting in 19 peer-reviewed articles, 8 media, 8 government reports, and 4 legislation documents.Results: The public expects a safe food system and they lack confidence in the current system. They desire incre

7、ased scientifically transparent communication from a trusted source, a stronger public health presence, a coordinated food safety regulatory system, and increased access to inspection results.Conclusions: Public health a

8、gencies must communicate easily understood transparent, scientific information to the public. Inspection disclosure systems have been effective in increasing transparency. Public health agencies must have a strong presen

9、ce in a coordinated food safety regulatory framework.Keywords: Food safety；Trust；Transparency；Government regulation ；Public health practice1. IntroductionAwareness of food safety issues among the public has increased du

10、e to a number of significant and well- publicized threats to public health [1–3]. Over the past few decades, numerous public health crises have eroded consumer trust in the public health food safety regulatory system [1–

11、6]. The population’s health depends on the avail- ability of safe food; therefore, it is imperative that the public has trust in their food supply and in the food safety system and the agencies responsible for overseeing

12、 it.In developed nations, there is a prevailing expectation that the products we purchase, prepare, and consume are safe and will not cause illness [4]. Public health agencies are involved in food safety policy to safegu

13、ard community health for the public good [7]. The public also has a legal right to expect the food they purchase is safe based on EU legislation.Contaminated food is not easily identifiable by consumers, placing much of

14、the onus for food safety on regulatory bodies, the food industry, professional associations, and other interested parties. The economic, health, and social impact of unsafe, contaminated, or adulterated food products ca

15、nnot be estimated accurately, but the effects of food-related disease outbreaks are extensive and difficult to reverse [1,3,8–10].It may be difficult for consumers to conceptualize the regulatory role played by the vario

16、us studies; the results of these studies became the primary data for this study. Initial literature searches of articles published between 1998 and 2010 revealed that, to date, little research has been conducted in the a

17、rea of enhancement of public trust in regulatory food safety systems. An iterative sampling method that allowed inclusion criteria to be refined as the study and analyses progressed was an important component of the meth

18、odology used.The initial scoping process began with an online search of research databases (Medline/PubMed, CINAHL, Ovid Health and Psychosocial Instruments, CBCA and CAB Direct) using the following list of general searc

19、h terms: policy sciences; public health; public opinion; risk perception; environmental health; health risk assessment; food production; food; health risk communication; information resources; consumer behavior; consumer

20、s; food safety measures; risk management; consumer education; food handling; and food service. Additional phrases and Boolean logic operators were employed using Scholars Portal in March 2007 and Scopus in July 2009 to e

21、nsure optimal capture. Search terms were added as results from preliminary searches produced new key phrases. Refer to Table 1 for a list of specific search phrases used.Table 1. Literature search terms. Specific search

22、phrases used followed general subject area searches.Search termsConsumer/public perception AND vulnerability AND food supply Public AND expectation AND public health AND food supply Policy evolution AND public healthFact

23、ors AND decision making AND public health policy Effectiveness* AND education AND campaign* AND public health Consumer/public behavi?r AND food safetyEffective public AND health policy AND formation/creation Consumer/pub

24、lic perception AND food (supply) protection/safety Government AND safeguarding* AND food supplyGovernment AND safeguarding AND food Government AND public perception AND food Public perception AND food protectionPublic p

25、erception AND food safety Policy AND food AND public perceptionPolicy AND food safetyPublic expectation AND food supplyPublic perception AND vulnerability AND food supply Risk AND public perception AND foodPublic opinion

26、 AND government AND food safety Public opinion AND government AND foodOnly studies that analyzed retail food safety outbreaks in Canada, the United States, Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand were included, in orde

27、r to limit the information to geographic areas that had similar policy frameworks and legislative structures to those in Canada. Only studies from 1998 to 2010 were included to ensure that the most recent events and curr