簡介：上海大學碩士學位論文財產(chǎn)所有權(quán)合理性的法哲學分析財產(chǎn)自由主義與工具主義的比較姓名宮建新申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)憲法學與行政法學指導教師李瑜青20030501海人學硼卜學位論義財產(chǎn)所有權(quán)臺刪性的法哲學分析ABSTRACTITISTHECOURSEOFSEEKINGTRUTHFORHUMANBEINGSINLAWTHATWESTUDYTHERATIONALISMOFPROPERTYRIGHTSPHIOSOPHICALLY，ANDALSOISMEANINGFULFOROURSOCIALGOALOFRULEOFTAWITISPOSSIBLETOUSEOURPROPERTYRIGHTSCORRECTLYONLYIFWECOULDFINDITSREALSPIRITS，ANDONLYWITHTHISWECOULDREDUCETHESOCIALCOSTSINOURLEGALPROJECTOFRULEOFLAW，IELESSENTHEDAMAGEOFHUMANITIESTHEESSAYISDIVIDEDINTOSIXSECTIONSONEPREFACEANDFIVEOTHERCHAPTERSINTHEPREFACE，THEAUTHORINTRODUCEDTHECONFLICTOFTWOPHILOSOPHIESONTHEPLATFORMOFPROPERTYRIGHTS，INOTHORWORDS，THECONFLICTOFPROPRIETARIANISMANDINSTRUMENTALISM，ANDSHOWEDHISQUESTIONINGSTOTHELATTERSECONDLY，INCHAPTER1，THEAUTHORGAVEABRIEFINTRODUCTIONOFTHREECHALLENGINGTHEORIES，THESOCIALIZATIONOFPROPMTYRIGHTS，THEECONOMICANALYSISOFLAWANDTHEDUTYBEARINGPRIVILEGESANDTHEAUTHORALSOFOUNDTHATTHETHREETHEORIESHADTHESAMEPHILOSOPHICALBASISOFINSTRUMENTALISMINCHAPTER2THEESSAYSTUDIEDTHEHISTORICANDTHERACIALCONCEPTIONSOFPROPERTYRIGHTSTHROUGHTHISWAYTHEAUTHOJHASDEFINEDTHEBORDEROFPROPERTYRIGHTSINCHAPTER3，AFTERREVIEWINGTHECLASSICALTHEORIESOFPROPERTYRIGHTS，INCLUDINGTHELABORPROPERTYOFLOCKEANDTHEFREEWILLOFHEGEL，THEWRITERHASSHOWEDUSAGENERALFEATUREOFTHEMTHECOMPARATIVEANALYSISOFCLASSICALTHEORIESOFPROPERTYRIGHTSANDINSTRUMENTALISMISTHEMAINCONTENTOFCHAPTER4THEMAINREASONTHATHASMISTAKENTHESPIRITSOFPROPERTYRIGHTSSUCCESSFULLYISTHATITISCONFUSEDBYTHERELATIONSHIPOFTHEORIESANDREALITIESFINALLY，THEARTICLEBELIEVEDTHATWESHOULDCHOOSECLASSICALTHEORIESASOURFUNDAMENTALLYPHILOSOPHICALBASEOFTHECONSTRUCTIONOFLEGALSYSTEMASFORINSTRUMENTALISMCARLBEONEOFACCESSORIESINTHECOURSEOFRULEOFLAWKEYWORDSPROPERTYRIGHTSPROPRIETARIANISMNATURALRIGHTSINSTRUMENTALISMLOCKEHEGEL

簡介：華中科技大學碩士學位論文中國社會轉(zhuǎn)型時期公共權(quán)力異化的哲學思考姓名冷梅申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)馬克思主義哲學指導教師李光玉2003510華中科技大學碩士學位論文ABSTRACTPUBLICPOWERALIENATIONISDIFFERENTFROMTHEORIGINALPOWERWHICHPOWERITSELFPRODUCESTHEOPPOSEMIGHTANDLOSETHE15RIMARYQUALIMTIVEREGULATIONONEOFTHEEXTREMEREPRESENTATIONSOFPOWERALIENATIONISCORRUPTIONJIANGZEMINPOINTSOUTINTHEREPORTMADEINTHE16THNATIONALCONGRESSOFTHECOMMUNISTPARTYOFCHINA‘PREVENTINGANDCOMBATINGCORRUPTIONISAIMPORTANTPOLITICALTASK?！甌HEPARTYMUSTNOTONLYREALIZETHEPRESSUREOFANTICORRUPTION，BUTALSEALIZETHATITWILLCONTINUEALONGPERIODTIMETHEPARTYMUSTNEVERWAVERINCARRYINGONTHEFIGHTAGAINSTCORRUPTIONBYMAKINGSTEADFASTCONFIDENCEANDMAKINGSOLIDWORK’’CONSIDERINGTHEPROBLEMOFPOWERALIENATIONWENOTONLYTHINKPOWERALIENATIONITSELFBUTALSOANALYZETHECAUSESOFPOWERALIENATIONANDDISCUSSTHEMEASURESTHEPURPOSEISTOMAKETHEPARTYSTATUSSTABLEANDMAKETHEPOWERENDOWEDWITHBYPEOPLESERVETHEPEOPLEINDEEDTHUSTHEFUNDAMENTAIINTERESTSOFTHEPEOPLECANBEREALIZEDATTHESAMETIME，THEREFLECTIONISTOIMPROVETHECADRE’DIATHESISWHICHISREQUIREDTOBEENHANCEDATTHEPRESENTTIMETHEARTICLEAIMSTOCONSIDERTHEPROBLEMOFPOWERALIENATIONINTRANSITIONALPERIODBASEDONMARXISMTHEORYSOCIALISTMARKETECONOMYTHEORYANDPOLITICALTHEORYETETHEARTICLEANALYZESTHEQUESTIONINVOLVINGTHREEASPECTSFIRSTLYHOWTOLOOKATTHEPHENOMENONTHEAUTHORTHINKSPOWERALIENATIONISASICKPHENOMENONASHUMANCOMEINTOPOLITICALSOCIETYTHEOWNERSOFPOWERAPPLYPOWERTOENLISTPRIVATEINTERESTSTHUS，THEPOWERDEVIATESTHECOMMONOBJECTIVEANDVIOLATESTHEPEOPLE’SINTERESTS，JUSTICEANDVALIDITYTHEAUTHORANALYZESTHEQUESTIONFROMSUCHWAYSASPROCESSANDINTERIORSTRUCTURESECONDLYWHYDOESPOWERALIENATETHEARTICLEANALYZESTHECAUSESLEADINGTOPOWERALIENATIONINTHEPOLITICALANDECONOMICPERSPECTIVEMOREOVER，WEEXAMINETHESEEDBEDOFPOWERALIENATIONFROMTHECULTUREASPECTFINALLYHOWCALLWEPREVENTANDCONTROLPOWERALIENATIONTHEARTICLEHASPUTFORWARDASERIESOFSUGGESTIONFROMTHEINSTITUTIONALINNOVATION，F(xiàn)OSTERINGCIVILSOCIETYANDFORMULATINGTHECIVICCULTUREKEYWORDSSOCIALTRANSITIONPUBLICPOWERALIENATIONII

簡介：南京師范大學碩士學位論文合法化、合理性與正義程序訴訟程序的哲學之維姓名韓德明申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)訴訟法學指導教師李力200351合法化、合理性與J下義程序第3頁共57負摘要，F(xiàn)F基于分離的事實與規(guī)范的整合需求，訴訟程序獲得了合法性前提，并因內(nèi)在于程序規(guī)則的事件的挑戰(zhàn)和外在于程序規(guī)則的事件的介入而合法化。得以合法化的訴訟程序勢必有其合理性實踐訴求，對此，本文結(jié)合訴訟程序兩種實踐模式一一職權(quán)主義和當事人主義一一所表征的兩種合理性內(nèi)涵，指明職權(quán)主義程序模式的工具目的合理性性質(zhì)和當事人主義程序模式的規(guī)范價值合理性性質(zhì)／并認為它們都是單向度體現(xiàn)了訴訟程序的合理性精神。進而，Y本文引入交往合理性理論，以其作為理論工具分析了訴訟程序的合理性問題，指出訴訟程序涉及犯罪糾紛事實、法律規(guī)范和主體意志三種本體論范疇，從而真正體現(xiàn)合理性的訴訟程序應當是追求真實、體現(xiàn)正當、主體真誠的三位一體。對此，本文還借用語用學工具，進一步分析和論證了訴訟程序以上三個方面的合理性要求。由于職權(quán)主義或當事人主義訴訟程序模式具有刻意設(shè)計的原因，從而作為唯理性設(shè)計的方案在實踐落實上必然難逃自我解構(gòu)的命運。對兩種唯理性設(shè)計的程序模式進行解構(gòu)主義閱讀的結(jié)局，是程序的多元主義或語境主義。當然，程序多元主義或語境主義并非對表征交往合理性的訴訟程序理念的顛覆，恰恰相反，程序多元主義正是對程序交往合理性要求的捍衛(wèi)和保證。關(guān)鍵詞訴訟雜殍合法性交往各運，洼語用事正義茬序，程序解構(gòu)

簡介：置南大學周滅匕學位論文題名中英對照文化哲學視野中的國際關(guān)系理論作者姓名郭彥指導教師姓名及學位、職稱陳喬之教授博士生導師學科、專業(yè)名稱國際關(guān)系論文提交日期年月日論文答辯日期答辯委員會主席論文評閱人學位授予單位和日期，一一，，，，，，，加兀妙口滋‘縱“，口，〔流月沁護

簡介：延邊大學碩士學位論文實現(xiàn)中國法治的哲學基礎(chǔ)姓名王麗申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)憲法學與行政法學指導教師何云鵬20070515ABSTRACTATPRESENT，CHINA’SMODERNIZATIONPROCESSOFTHEFULEOFLAWINTOANUNPRECEDENTEDPERJODOFPROSPERITYANDGLORY；HOWEVER，GUIDINGPHILOSOPHYOFTHEMODEMLAWISNOTACONSTRUCTATPRESENT，MANYLEGALPRACTITIONERSHAVEBEENDISCUSSINGTHISISSUEBASEDONTHEANALYSISOFTRADITIONAICHINESEANDWESTEMPHILOSOPHY王1RANCE，THEADVANTAGESANDDISADVANTAGESCOMPAREDTOTHEGAPBETWEENTHETWOSIDESLIE，CONSTRUCTIONOFCHINAINANATTEMPTTOFINDAMODEMPHILOSOPHYOFLAW，TOPMMOTETHERULE0FLAWINTHEPROCESSOFCHINA’S，HELPINSOMEWAYCHINALAWCOURSEOFHISTORICALDEVELOPMENT，ANDALTHOUGHITISNOT1IKETHEWEST，THEREWERECLEARWHICHLAWSCHOOL；HOWEVER，CHINALAWHISTORICALDEVELOPMENTCLEARLYHASAMAINLINE；FRANCEINPARTICULARISTHEPHILOSOPHYOFCIVILJZATIONISVERYCLEALCHINAANDFRANCEISLHATTBEPHILOSOPHYOFCJVINZATJONJSBASICALLYCONFUCIANPHILOSOPHYTOTHEMAINSTREAM，WITHLAWLESSONSATTHEPHILOSOPHY_OFSUPPORT，TOTAOISTPHILOSOPHYTOADDTHATSUCHANINHERITEDFTOMTHECONTEXTWESTEMPHILOSOPHYCIVILIZATIONTOAMORE0BVIOUSMODEMWESTEMSCHOOLFOURDAFAISTHEENTIREWESTEMSOCIETYPHILOSOPHYOFTHELAWWEREINTEGRATEDTHEFEFORE，THISPAPEFANALYZESTHECHINESEANDWESTERNREPRESENTATIONOFTHESEJURISTSTHEPHILOSOPHYCONNOTATION，ANDTOCONLPARETHEIRRESPECTIVEADVANTAGESANDDISADVANTAGESISTHEHOPEOFMODERNCHINESEPHILOSOPHYEXPLORETHEDEVEL叩MENTOFTHEBRIGHTLIGHTSUPATRACEANCIENTCHINESELAWISTHEFIRSTMETHODFROMTHEBE西NNINGOFTLLEPHILOSOPHICALMETHOD；WESTERNJURJSTSANCIENTMETHODWASFIRSTINPOLITICALSCIENCE卸DPHILOSOPHYMETHODBEGANVISIBILITYANDWESTERNPHILOSOPHYRESEARCHPERSPECTIVEFORTHEDEVELOPMENTOFJURISPMDENCEWASTOESTABLISHTHEBASICFRAMEWORKANDSTARTEDTHEFIRSTLAWPRACTICEAILCIENTPHILOSOPHYANDMETHODSHAVEBEENEXAMINEDBYTHEINTERESTANDFOCUS，THEAUTHORALSOPHILOSOPHICALMETHODTOINJECTSUCHAGREATENTHUSIASMANDINDEPTHTHINKINGCATEREDTOTHEMODERNSTUDYOFTHESCIENCEOFPARADIGMSHIFTTHETRENDTHATISTOEXAMINETHECONTENTBASEDMETHODOLOGY；THEVALUE0FASINGLETFENDFROMTHECLASSWILLSHIFTVALUEPLURALISM；PHILOSOPHYRESEARCHMETHODSFROMTHEOVERALLTENDENCYOFTHEMODE加DOCTRINEOFINDIVJDUALISMLAWT00LS，INTHISTIMEOFTHETRENDOFTHETIMESINTHECONTEMPORARYMARXJSTPHILOSOPHYBASEDONTHEANALYSISOFSEVERALWELLKNOWNCHINESEANDWESTERNSCHOOLOFLAWPHILOSOPHY，CHINESEANDWESTERNLEGALMETHODSII

簡介：湘潭大學碩士學位論文吳經(jīng)熊對霍姆斯法律哲學之承繼與超越姓名李冬松申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)法學理論指導教師黎曉平20070605IIABSTRACTSINCETHEINITIATIONOFLEGALREFMATIONINLATEQINGDYNASTYCHINESELAWYERSHAVEDEVOTEDTHEMSELVESTOTHEQUESTOFLEGALSIGNIFICANCEINTHEPEOPLE’SLIVINGAMONGTHEMJOHNCHWUISTHEMOSTEMINENTFHISGIFTEDCOGNITIONOFLAWPROFOUNDUNDERSTINGOFTHETRENDSOFLAWDEVELOPMENTTHESPIRITOFLAWHISFIRMBELIEFINPOSITIVISMMETAPHYSICSTHROUGHOUTHISACADEMICQUESTHEHASENDEAVEDTOTRANSCENDIENTALOCCIDENTALTHEIESOFLAWWU’STHEYOFLAWISABUNDANTINITSCONTENTHISPHILOSOPHYOFLAWINPARTICULARHISTHREEDIMENSIONTHEYOFLAWISWIDELYTAKENASTHEIGINATIONOFCHINESENEOANALYTICALSCHOOLOFJURISPRUDENCEPROVIDINGENRICHINGTHELEGALARGUMENTATIONOFHOLMES’PREDICTIVETHEYOFLAWHEATTACHESMUCHIMPTANCETOTHERESEARCHONTHESCIENTIFICMETHODSINJUDICIALPROCESSTHEPSYCHOLOGICALFACTSINLAWINTRODUCESPSYCHOLOGYINTOLEGALRESEARCHHETAKESLAWASANARTOFBALANCINGINTERESTSDEMONSTRATESHISSPLENDIDINTUITIONINTHEUSEOFTHISARTFOLLOWINGSTTHOMASAQUINASWUBASESNATURALLAWONTHEREALWLDMAKESITALIVERULETHATCHANGESTOTHEDEVELOPMENTOFSOCIETYTHISTHESISPRESENTSACOMPARATIVEANALYSISOFWU’SHOLMES’PHILOSOPHIESOFLAWFTHEQUESTOFTHESPECIALVALUEOFWU’STHEYOFLAWWU’SNEOANALYTICALLEGALTHEYTHOUGHIGINATINGINHOLMES’THEYDEVELOPSANEWSCHOOLOFTHEYONTHEBASISOFACOMPOUNDOFTHOUGHTSOFMANYOTHERLEGALSCHOOLSPROMOTESTHEDEVELOPMENTOFTHEREALISMJURISPRUDENCETOANEWSTAGEHISINTELLECTUALCONTEMPLATIVEINTUITIONINSPIREDBYHOLMES’PERCEPTIONOFLAWINTEGRATESTHECHINESEINTUITIONHOLMES’INTOANEWSTYLEOFPERCEPTIONOFLAWHISTHEYOFNATURALLAWINTEGRATESSCIENCERELIGIOUSWSHIPETERNALITYTRANSIENCECHANGEABILITYPERSISTENCEWHICHPROVIDESINSPIRATIONSFTHECURRENTPREDOMINANCEOFPOSITIVISMRELATIVISMINLEGALRESEARCHTHISTHESISISCOMPOSEDOFFIVEPARTSTHEINTRODUCTIONPARTINTRODUCESTHEBACKGROUNDOFTHISRESEARCHCURRENTDEVELOPMENTOFTHEAREAPERSPECTIVESTHESTRUCTUREOFTHETHESISCHAPTERONEANALYZESHOLMES’PHILOSOPHYOFLAWFROMWU’SPERSPECTIVECHAPTERTWOINTRODUCESWU’SPHILOSOPHYOFLAWFOCUSINGONHISNEOANALYTICALTHEYOFLAWTHEYOFNATURALLAWEPISTEMOLOGYOFLAWCHAPTERTHREEPRESENTSACOMPARATIVEANALYSISOFWU’SHOLMES’PHILOSOPHIESOFLAWTOPROBEINTOTHELINKSBETWEENTHETWOTHESPECIALFEATURESOFWU’STHEYOFLAWTHECONCLUSIONPARTPRESENTSCOMMENTSONWU’SPHILOSOPHYOFLAWKEYWDSJOHNCHWUHOLMESNEOANALYTICALJURISPRUDENCEPREDICTIVETHEYOFLAWEVOLVINGNATURALLAW

簡介：浙江大學博士學位論文董仲舒政治哲學發(fā)微姓名崔濤申請學位級別博士專業(yè)中國古典文獻學指導教師崔富章20040401ABSTRACTCONFUCIANPHILOSOPHYISTHEMOSTIMPORTANT“IDEAISTICGENE”O(jiān)FCHINESECULTUREWHICHCANNEVERBEIGNORED，ANDTODAYWECANNEVERTALKABOUTCHINESEPHILOSOPHYTHOUGHTWITHOUTTHISSCH001WHILEINTERMSOFCONFUCIANPHILOSOPHYITSELFDONGZHONGSHU，ACONFUCIANSCHOLARWHOLIVEDINWESTHAN，HADPLAYEDAGREATROLEINTHEHISTORICALPROCESSOFCONFUCIANTHOUGHT’SDEVELOPMENT，EVOLVEMENTANDFORMINGITSOWNSTYLEITISPROVIDEDTHATWECALLNOTDISCOURSEDONCHINESEPHILOSOPHYWITHOUTCONFUCIANISM，THENWECANALSONOTDISCOURSEONCONFUCIANISMWITHOUTDONGZHONGSHUEITHERHISSTORYORHISLEARNINGISACONTROVERSIALBUTATTRACTIVE“PROBLEM“THISDISSERTATIONMAKESOMETRIALINDIVIDUALREADINGONDONG’SPOLITICALPHILOSOPHICALTHOUGHTTHISDISSERTATIONINCLUDESASFOLLOWSAFEWCHAPTERSPRIMARILYINTRODUCTIONFROMHORIZONOFPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYBYPHENOMENOLOGICALHERMENEUTICREADINGMETHOD，IANALYZETHEHISTORICALORIGINOFTHETHEORYOFTHEDONGZHONGSHUANDTHEPRESENTSTUDYCONDITIONSBRIEFLYANDEXPATIATETHEPOSSIBILITYOFHISTHEORYTOBEREGARDEDASAKINDOFPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYANDTHEATTITUDEWESHOULDHOLDTOWARDSREADINGHISTEXTCHAPTERIIDISCUSSTHERECONDITECHARACTEROFDONG’SPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYIANALYZEDONG’SHORIZONOFUNSCRAMBLINGCLASSICINAWAYOF‘‘HISTORICALCREATINGCOMPREHENSION’’ANDHISREADINGTOTHEWRITINGOFCHUNGMWHICHHEREGARDED∞APOLITICALAFFAIRCHAPTERIFIDISCUSSDOOG’SHISTORICAL‘SAY”ABOUTTHEIDEAOFSECULARVALUEIDISCUSSDONG’SESTABLISHMENTOFTHECONCEPTIONOFCONFUCIAN“VIITUOUSPOLITICS”德政ANDHISREASONINGONBENEVOLENCE仁WHICHHEREGARDEDASANATION’SJUSTICEFROMHISLOGISTICDIALECTICOFCONFUCIANTHEORYOFHUMANISMCHAPTERIIIINTHISCHAPTERIDISCUSSTHEPROBLEMOFDONG’SPOLITICALPHILOSOPHY’SAPPEALINGTOTHEMETAPHYSICSOFTHEFOUNDATIONOFSECULARVALUEIEXPOUNDTHEINDIVIDUALEFFORTWHICHDONGZHONGSHUHASMADETOPURSUETHEULTIMATEFOUNDATIONOFCONFUCIANPOLITICALPHILOSOPHY，ANDTHEEXISTENTIAL“VIEWWORLD”WHICHHEHASCONSTRUCTEDWITHGOD天ASITSCORGANDHISTHOUGHTOFINDUCTIONBETWEENGOD天ANDHUMANBYWHICHHEHASMADEHISDISCOURSESURPASSTHEAMBITOFTHEEXISTENTIALHORIZONCHAPTERIVIDISCUSSDONG’SHISTORICALJUSTIFICATIONFORTHEVALIDITYOFTEMPORALREGIMEINTHISCHAPTERIEXPOUNDDONG’SPOLITICALIDEAOFESTABLISHINGAKINDOFDIVINEPOLITICALETHICBYWHICHHEALLEGEDTHATREGALITYCOMEFROMGOD天THEDEMONSTRATIONOFTHISIDEAISRADICALLYBASEDUPONDONG’SSERIOUSATTITUDEONTHESIGNIFICATIONOFTHESACRIFICEFORGOD天ANDDONG’SAMBITIONOFEXPECTINGTOMOLDAKINDOFNATIONALMYTHOFETHICALRELIGIONHASBROUGHTSOCALLED“EXOTERICPOLITICS”ANDTHEINSTITUTIONALIZATIONOFCONFUCIANISMATLAST，IDISCUSSDONG’SINHERITINGANDDEVELOPINGOFTHETRADITIONALREVOLUTIONARYSPIRITOFCONFUCIANISM，ANDTHEFOREORDINATIONOFCONFUCIANWRITINGREVOLUTIONTENDINGTOWARDSDISCOURSEDESPOTISMINDONG’SPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYKEYWORDSDONGZHONGSHU，CHUNQ掘FANLU，POLITICALPHILOSOPHYCONFUCIANISM2

簡介：中圖分類號UDC學校代碼10055密級公開高蕊犬淫碩士學位論文梁啟超政治法律思想及其哲學基礎(chǔ)LIANGQICHAO’SPOLITICALLEGALTHOUGHTANDPHILOSOPHYFOUNDATION答辯委員會主席評閱人南開大學研究生院二。一。年十一月南開大學學位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明所呈交的學位論文，是本人在導師指導下進行研究工作所取得的研究成果。除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外，本學位論文的研究成果不包含任何他人創(chuàng)作的、已公開發(fā)表或者沒有公開發(fā)表的作品的內(nèi)容。對本論文所涉及的研究工作做出貢獻的其他個人和集體，均已在文中以明確方式標明。本學位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明的法律責任由本人承擔。學位論文作者簽名崔鍪2010年11月26日非公開學位論文標注說明本頁表中填寫內(nèi)容須打印根據(jù)南開大學有關(guān)規(guī)定，非公開學位論文須經(jīng)指導教師同意、作者本人申請和相關(guān)部門批準方能標注。未經(jīng)批準的均為公開學位論文，公開學位論文本說明為空白。論文題目申請密級口限制≤2年口秘密≤10年口機密≤20年保密期限20年月日至20年月日審批表編號批準日期20年月日南開大學學位評定委員會辦公室蓋章有效注限制★2年可少于2年秘密★10年可少于10年機密★20年可少于20年

簡介：華中科技大學碩士學位論文從哲學的角度思考當代中國法治的合理性及其實現(xiàn)姓名譚振起申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)科學技術(shù)哲學指導教師李思孟20050501IIABSTRACTTHISPAPERUNDERTHEGUIDEOFHISTICALMATERIALISMFOCUSESONTHREERELATEDPROBLEMTHENEWUNDERSTINGOFESSENCEOFLAWFROMLAWTORULEOFLAWCHINESERULEOFLAWREALITYITHINKTHATBASICPOINTOFVIEWOFMARXISMISTHATLAWISIGINATEDFROMTHEECONOMICBASISWHICHISBASEDONTHELEVELOFPRODUCTIVITYTHISPOINTEXPOSESREASONABILITYOFLAWFROMREGULARITYOFLAWTHEREASONABILITYOFLAWINFACTCONTAINSACCDANCEWITHREASONABILITYWHICHISCONTENTOFPURPOSEOFMANMARXHIMSELFREGARDPRACTICINGSPIRITWAYASESSENCEOFLAWTHISPOINTWASNEGLECTEDBYTHEETICALCIRCLEWHICHISHELPFULTOUSTOUNDERSTTHEREASONABILITYOFLAWTHATRULEOFLAWFMEDINWESTERNSOCIETYISNOTINCIDENTALFROMTHEBEGINNINGOFWESTERNCULTUREANCIENTGREECEROMEHADNATURELAWTRADITIONOFADVOCATINGRULEOFLAWREASONABILITYTHESECONDPARTOFTHISPAPERDISCUSESTHEHISTYOFRULEOFLAWFROMTHEPOINTUNIFMOFHISTYLOGICASCONTRASTTHEPAPERDISCUSESTHEANCIENTCHINESETHOUGHTSOFLAWTHEDIFFERENCEBETWEENANCIENTCHINATHEWESTMANIFESTDIFFERENCEOFCULTURESTHEROOTLIESINTHEDIFFERENCEOFECONOMICLIFESTYLEDEVELOPMENTOFMARKETECONOMYMAKESTHESOCIALSUBJECTSFROMSTATUSTOCONTRACTWHICHATLASTLEADTORULEOFLAWNOWCHINAHASESTABLISHEDTHEAIMOFRULEOFLAWTHISISTHERESULTOFUNDERSTINGTHEIMPTANCEOFRULEOFLAWOTHERWISEITISTHEDEMOFSOCIALISTMARKETECONOMYFURTHERMEECONOMICGLOBALIZATIONTHEENTRANCEOFWTOMAKESITINTERNATIONALDEMSCONSIDERINGCHINESEREALISTICSITUATIONTHEROADOFREALIZINGRULEOFLAWISAROADLEADINGBYTHEGOVERNMENTWHICHISDIFFERENTFROMTHEWESTERNKEYWDSCHINALAWRULEOFLAWREASONABILITYREALIZATION

簡介：西北大學博士學位論文十七世紀西方數(shù)學的自然哲學背景沿著笛卡爾的“思”路姓名蒙虎申請學位級別博士專業(yè)科學技術(shù)史（數(shù)學史）指導教師李文林20030529ABSTRACTTAKINGTHEDEVELOPMENTOFMATHEMATICSINWESTERNRATIONALTRADITIONASTHEBASICTHREADANDSPRINGBOARD，REVIEWINGTHEINFLUENCEOFREBOUNDOFTHEVIEWOFTHENATUREINGREECEANDRELIGIONATYREFORM，COMBININGTHECHARACTERISTICSOFTHE“SCIENCEOFQUANTUM”O(jiān)FWESTERNMATHEMATICSIN17THCENTURY,THEARTICLENOTONLYPROVIDESABUNDANTBLURRYCONTINUUMOFQUANTITYDIRECTLYANDDEFENDSFORTHE‘‘RATIONALITYOFARITHMETIC’’INDIRECTLYBUTALSOEXPATIATEDTHATTHEPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREWHOSECHARACTERISTICS甜ETHEQUANTIFICATIONOFTHENALNREANDTHEMECHANIZATIONOFTHEUNIVERSEHASAGREATINFLUENCEOVER17“CENTURY’S“MATHEMATICSOFARITHMETIC”，ESPECIALLYOVERTHEBIRTHANDTHEDEVELOPMENTOFANALYTICGEOMETRYANDCALCULUS．THEARTICLEGOESALONGCARTESIANTRAINOFTHOUGHTS，CLARIFIESTHATWHILETHENEWMATHEMATICSWHOSECOMMISSARYISCALCULUSISTHENEWBYPRODUCTOF“RETRIEVINGPHENOMENA’INTHEWESTEN3TRADITIONALLOGES，THEPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREAFTERREVIVALOFLEARNINGWHICHWASGREATLYINFLUENCEDBYTHEWESTERNLOGESOFTRADITIONHASALREADYFORMEDANEWEFFECTIVEWHYOF“RETRIEVINGPHENOMENA’INWESTLOGESFROMTHEQUANTIFICATIONOFTHEPROSPECTOFTHEWORLDTOTHEMATHEMATICATLONOFTHEPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATURE．SOMEFAMOUSHISTORIANSOFSCIENCESUCHASBOTERANDA．KOYRDEMPHASIZEDTHATTHEOUTSTANDINGCHARACTERISTICOFNEOTERICMATHEMATICSIS“MATHEMATICATION”INTHEIRSERIESOFCLASSICALBOOKSSUCHASTHEBASEOFNEOTERICPHYSICS∞METAPHYSICS．STUDYOFGALILEO,FROMTHECLOSEWORMTOTHEINFINITEUNIVERSE．PROFESSORWUGUOSHENGOFPHILNSOPHYDEPARTMENT,PEKINGUNIVERSITYALSOCONCENTRATEDONTHISISSUEINHISBOOKSSUCHASTHEERRORINNOUMENONOFTHENATURE，THERETREATOFTHENATURE，CONCEPTOFTIME．THEYDISCUSSEDTHEISSUEFROMASPECTSOFNEWPROSPECTOFTHEUNIVERSEANDTHENATURE，CHARACTERISTICSOFPHYSICSPHILUSOPHYOFTHENATURE，ETC．THESAMETHINGOFTHESESCHELESSONTHISISSUEISTHATTHEYALLCONCENTRATEDONTHETHEORETICSURFACE．ASARESULT,WECALL’TSEETHEINFLUENCEOFSCIENTIFIC“MATHEMATIZATION’’ONTHEDEVELOPMENTOFMATHEMATICSITSELF．THEARTICLETAKESMATHEMATIZATIONASTHECHARACTERISTICOFNEOTERICSCIENCEBYSTARTINGFROMTHEBACKGROUNDOF17“CENTURY’SPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREANDREVIEWINGTHREEASPECTS．THESET11REEASPECTSATETHEMATHEMATIZATIONOFTHEPROSPECTOFTHENATUREWHICHISBASEDONTHETRADITIONOFPYTHAGORAS，THEMECHANIZATIONOFTHEPROSPECTOFTHEUNIVERSEWHICHISBASEDOOTHETRADITIONOFCHRISTIANISM，ANDTHEDEDUCTINGOFTHESYSTEMPHYSICSWHICHISBASEDONTHETRADITIONOFEUCLID．ATTHESALTLETIME，THEPOINTTHATMUSTBECLARIFIEDISTHATTHEESTABLISHMENTOFTHENEWVIEWOFTHENATUREANDTHEBOOMINGOFTHEPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREOFFEREDTHENECESSARYQUALIFICATIONOFMATHEMATIZATION．AFTERANALYZINGTHEPROCESSOFMATHEMATIZATION，SEVERALCONCLUSIONSALESUMMEDUPASFOLLOWS．FIRST．WHILETHESUBJECTSINVEMIGATEDOF17“CENTURY，SMATHEMATICSINCLUDETHEMIXTUREOFTHESTRUCTUREOFSEQUENCE，THESTRUCTUREOFALGEBRAANDTHEFUZZYQUANTUMINTHESTRUCTURETOPOLOGY．ANDITISNOTHINGOTHERTHANTHENEWPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREWHOSECHARACTERISTICSARETHEQUANTIFICATIONOFSUBSTANCEANDTHEMECHANIZATIONOFTHEMOVEMENTTHATDEFENDSTHEEXISTENCEANDTHEPROPERTYOFTHISQUANTUMSECOND．THEQUANTIFICATIONOFSUBSTANCEANDTHEMECHANIZATIONOFTHEMOVEMENTWHICHAREEMPHASIZEDBYTHENEWPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREOFFERSAINTUITIONISTIEEONTINUUNWHICHTAKESTHEEXTENSIONOFTHESPACE．TIMEFORTHEBIRTHOFCALCULOUS．ITISNOTHINGELSETHANTHEDIVISION．THESUMMINGANDTHERATIOOFTHEINMITIONISTICCONTINUUNTHATBECOMETHEBASICMANNERINWHICH

簡介：西南師范大學碩士學位論文加繆的荒謬哲學思想研究姓名鄭國玉申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)外國哲學指導教師陶林崔延強20040601RESEARCHONCAMUS’THOUGHTOFABSURDITYMAJORWESTERNPHILOSOPHYSUPERVISORASSOCIATEPROFTANLINPROFCUIYANQIANGSPECIALTYWESTERNJURISPRUDENCEAUTHORZHENGGUOYU2001006ABSTRACTCAMUSISONEOFTHEOUTSTANDINGPERSONAGESWHOPROFOUNDLYEXPOSEABSURDITY“ABSURDITY’AND“REVOLT”ISAPAIROFCORECONCEPTSINCAMUS’WRITINGSTHEFORMERSUMSUPHISSOBERCONSCIOUSNESSOFMAN’SHELPLESSINFACEOFTHEWORLDANDEXISTENCE，ANDITALSODECONSTRUCTSTHECONFIDENCEINMAN’SPOWERSINCERENAISSANCE；THELATTERMAKESCLEARTHEPOSITIVEATTITUDEMANSHOULDHAVEWHENFACINGSUCHANEXISTENCEATTHESAMETIMEITISBOTHAHERITAGEANDMODEMINTERPRETATIONOFMANSDIGNITYANDPURSUITOFMORALITYINTRADITIONALHUMANISTICTHOUGHTSINTHETIDEOFMODEMNIHILISMCAMUS’THINKINGISAPERSISTENCEOFVALUABLELIFE，ANDALSOACONTRIBUTIONTOIDEOLOGY，INTHE20。CENTURYTLLISPASSAGEMAKESRESEARCHONHISTHOUGHTFROMFIVEPARTS，PARTITHEORIGINOFABSURDITYATFIRSTHISTORICALCIRCUMSTANCESOFWESTERNPOLITICSANDECONOMYAREDISCUSSEDRANGINGFROMTHEEARLY20“CENTURYTOTHEMIDDLEOFTHE20“THENTHISPARTINVESTIGATESTHESOURCEOFTHEORYANDTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENCARABSANDEXISTENTIALISMPARTIITHETHEORYOFABSURDITYTHISPARTISTHEFOCALMINTOFTHISWRITINGFIRSTTHISPARTCONFIRMSCAMUS’POSITIONINTHEHISTORYOFPHILOSOPHYANDLITERATURETHEN，BEGINNINGWITHANALYZINGHISWORKSOFPHILOSOPHYANDLITERATURE，ITDISCUSSESTHEFEELINGANDCONCEPTOFABSURDITYGIVINGOUTTHECAUSESOFBEINGABSURDANDSPECIFICADPEARANCESINREALLIREATLASTITPRESENTSTHEATTITUDEOFRESISTANCETOABSURDITYANDTHELIMITTOITPANⅡITHEDIFFERENCESOFPHILOSOPHYBETWEENCAMUSANDSAMETHISPARTMAINLYDISCUSSESTHEDIFIERENTOPINIONOFABSURDITYFREEDOMANDCOMMONHUMANNATUREBETWEENTHEMANDITALSODISCUSSESTHEDIFFERENTATTITUDETODEALINGWITHTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENINDIVIDUALSANDOTHERSASWELLASTHEARGUMENTBETWEENTHEMONFIGHTERSPARTIVREFLECTIONONABSURDITYINCAMUS’POLITICALPOINTSTHISPARTDISCUSSESTHEREFLECTIONINCAMUS’THOUGHTSAGAINSTFASCISM，LEGALVIOLENCEANDDEATHPENALTYANDITSHOWSTHEPROCESSOFFORMATIONOFTHESEVIEWPOINTSPARTVTHINKINGFREELYOFCAMUS’THOUGHTTHISPARTTRIESTOINVESTIGATETHEREALISTICMEANINGSOFCAMUS’THINKINGFROMTHESENSEANDVALUEOFE虹STENCEOFLIFETHATBEINGABSURDINTENDSTOPURSUITTHISPARTATTEMPTSTOINVESTIGATEITSMEANINGANDINFLUENCEKEYWORDSABSURDITYCONSCIOUSNESSRESISTANCEFIGHTERFREEDOMCOMMONHUMANNATURE

簡介：中圖分類號UDC學校代碼10055密級公開高恐犬法碩士學位論文晏陽初平民教育思想的哲學思考。PHILOSOPHYTHINKINGINYANYANGCHU’SCOMMONEREDUCATIONTHOUGHTS答辯委員會主席菱藍送南開大學研究生院二。一一年十月南開大學學位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明所呈交的學位論文，是本人在導師指導下進行研究工作所取得的研究成果。除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外，本學位論文的研究成果不包含任何他人創(chuàng)作的、已公開發(fā)表或者沒有公開發(fā)表的作品的內(nèi)容。對本論文所涉及的研究工作做出貢獻的其他個人和集體，均已在文中以明確方式標明。本學位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明的法律責任由本人承擔。學位論文作者簽名鄞室2011年11月28日非公開學位論文標注說明本頁表中填寫內(nèi)容須打印根據(jù)南開大學有關(guān)規(guī)定，非公開學位論文須經(jīng)指導教師同意、作者本人申請和相關(guān)部門批準方能標注。未經(jīng)批準的均為公開學位論文，公開學位論文本說明為空白。論文題目申請密級口限制≤2年口秘密≤10年口機密≤20年保密期限20年月日至20年月日審批表編號批準日期20年月日南開大學學位評定委員會辦公室蓋章有效注限制★2年可少于2年秘密★10年可少于10年機密★20年可少于20年

簡介：東南大學碩士學位論文基因?qū)＠舾蓡栴}的哲學思考姓名黃步龍申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)科學技術(shù)哲學指導教師葉明20041222THEDEVELOPMENTOFTECHNOLOGYOFGENEHASASTRONGIMPACTONTRADITIONALGENESYSTEM．THEREARESOMEPHILOSOPHICALISSUESABOUTGENERELATEDPATENT．DOESGENELISTBELONGTOINVENTIONORDISCOVERERMAYTHEPEOPLEWHOOFFERGENERESOURCEGOSHARESBENEFITOFGENERELATEDPATENTWITHTHEINVENTORISTHEGENERELATEDPATENTIMPARTIALORNOT,ETC．THEPAPERISABOUTTHESEISSUES．THISPAPERANALYSESTHESEPHILOSOPHICALISSUESSURROUNDINGTHEAIMANDCHARACTERISTICOFTHEPATENTSYSTEM．THEAIMOFLAWMAKINGOFPATENTLAWISUTILITARIAN．THETHEORYOFBENEFITBALANCEISTHEBASEOFTHEORYOFINTELLIGENCELAWINCLUDINGPATENTLAW．FIRSTLY,ABOUTTHEINVENTIONOFGENELIST,THISPAPERANALYSESPUZZLEABOUTTHEINVENTIONANDDISCOVEREROFGENELIST，ANDLOOKSBACKUNDERSTANDINGPROCESSOFSOMECOUNTRIESINTHEISSUESABOUTNARLVDLMATTERPATENT．THISPAPERALSOANALYSESTHESEISSUESFROMTHEAIMOFPATENTSYSTEM,THEPOLICYOFSCIENCEANDTECHNOLOGY,INDUSTRYOFSCIENCEANDTECHNOLOGY．TOUNDERSTANDTHEGENEINNATURALSTATEISSCIENTIFICDISCOVERER．BUTALTERBEINGSEPARATEDANDBEINGMADEPURE，THEGENELISTCANBEUSEDININDUSTRY．SOTHEGENELISTISAKINDOFINVENTION．11

簡介：R768932學校編號；Q學號2002017密級圖書分類號I630／01福建師范大學碩士學位論文關(guān)于全面建設(shè)小康社會進程中保護私有財產(chǎn)的哲學審視PHILOSOPHICCOMPREHENSIONABOUTPROTECTINGTHEPDVATEPROPERTYINTHEPROCESSOFBUILDINGLROUNDWELLOFFSOCIETY張愛豐學科專業(yè)墨壺墨圭邈蜇堂研究方向經(jīng)進蜇雯指導教師基垂羞塾援申請學位級別蜇堂亟論文提交日期至壘壁曼笙璺且論文評閱人論文答辯日期答辯委員會主席學位授予單位學位授予日期2005年4月擅蕉婭蒸盎堂至壘Q曼生曼旦SYNOPSISTOBUILDALLROUNDWELLOFFSOCIETYWENEEDTOESTABLISHANDIMPROVETHESYSTEMOFMODERNPMPERTYRIGHTANDPROTECTTHELEGALPRIVATEPROPERTYOFTHESOCIALISTSOCIETYTHISARTICLEMAINLYEXPOUNDSTHEFACLABOUTPROTECTINGTHEPRIVATEPROPERTYINTHEPROCESSOFBUILDINGALLROUNDWELLOFFSOCIETYINTERMSOFECONOMICPHILOSOPHYTHEPRIVATEPROPE啊OFTHESOCIALISTSOCIETYINCLUDESTHEPRIVATELYOWNEDPROPERTYANDTHEPRIVATELYOCCUPIEDPROPERTYTHEPRIVATELYOWNEDPROPRIETARYINCLUDESOWNERSHIPANDPOSSESSIONTHESOCIALISTPRIVATEPROPERTYHASITSOWNSPECIALCHARACTERSTHEREAREMANYDISCUSSIONSOFPRIVATEPROPERTYBOTHJNCHINAANDTHEWESTSOCIETYALTHOUGHTHESEDISCUSSIONSHAVETHEIROWNHISTORICALPHILOSOPHYBASISTHEYCANDOHELPTOOURBUILDINGA_ROUNDWELLOFFSOOIETYTHEMARXISMCLASSICAUTHORSHADEXPOUNDEDTHECERTAINTYOFTHEPROTECTIONOFPRIVATEPROPERTYUNDERSPECIALCONDITIONSONTHEBASISOFCRITICIZINGANDINHERITINGOTHERSTHEPHILOSOPHYBASISOFPROTECTINGPRIVATEPROPERTYLIESINTHEPRACTICEOFBUILDINGALLROUNDWELLOFFSOCIETYATTHEPRESENTSTAGEWESHOULDPROTECTPRIVATEPROPERTYACCORDINGTOTHENEEDOFIMPROVINGTHESOCIALISTMARKETECONOMYSYSTEM，BUILDINGSOCIALISTPOLITICSCIVILIZATIONFOLLOWINGTHERULEOFDEVELOPMENTOFTHEPROPERTYCARRYINGOUTTHESCIENTIFICDEVELOPMENTVIEWANDSTRUCTURINGTHEHARMONIOUSSOCIETYSOWEMUSTTAKETHEEFFECTIVEMEASURESTOPROTECTTHEPRIVATEPROPERTYWESHOULDCHANGETHEVIEWNOTSUITABLEOFTHEPRACTICE，PERFECTTHELEGALSYSTEMANDSETDOWNTHECORRESPONDINGPOLICIESTOPROTECTTHEPRIVATEPROPERTYINTHECOURSEOFPROTECTINGTHEPRIVATEPROPERTYWENEEDTOHANDLEWELLTHERELATIONBETWEENPROTECTINGTHEPUBLICPROPERTYANDPROTECTINGTHEPRIVATEPROPERTYTHERELATIONBETWEENPROTECTINGTHEPRIVATEPROPERTYANDADHERINGTOTHESOCIALISTSYSTEMSANDTHERELATIONBETWEENPROTECTINGTHEPRIVATEPROPERTYANDADHERINGTOCOMMUNISMIDEALANDVALUESKEYWORDSBUILDINGALLROUNDWELLOFFSOCIETY；PRIVATEPROPERTY；PHILOSOPHY；CONNOTATION；INEVITABILITY；MEASURES；QUESTIONS

簡介：華東政法學院碩士學位論文哲學解釋學視野下的法律解釋分析姓名朱曉松申請學位級別碩士專業(yè)法學理論指導教師李桂林20050425解釋中的前理解和視域融合、法律解釋中的自由裁量權(quán)等三個方面對法律解釋理論的動態(tài)性、創(chuàng)造性和探究性做了具體和完整的分析，尤其突出了法官在法律適用中的作用。本文的第三章通過對中國法律解釋體制的分析，指出我國的法律解釋體制是多元多級的、以立法者為中心的法律解釋體制。并分析了這種體制形成的原因。通過分析，結(jié)合哲學解釋學理淪，作者提出了兩點完善我國法律解釋體制的建議。在簡短的余論部分里，作者簡要地對法官的自身品格作了說明，因為無論一種理論多么的完善，最終都要落實到具體的人身上。作為法律解釋的主體，法官的自身素質(zhì)顯的尤為重要。