民事糾紛中的權(quán)利沖突問(wèn)題研究.pdf

1、y772569橇旦大學(xué)學(xué)校代碼：10246學(xué)號(hào)：蝴l嘶碩士學(xué)位論文(專業(yè)學(xué)位)民事糾紛中的權(quán)利沖突問(wèn)題研究院系(所)：法學(xué)院專姓業(yè)：名：法律碩士蔡曉昂指導(dǎo)教師：侯健副教授完成日期：2005年4月22日AbstractDuringthepmcessofourcountry’spmmotionofruleofIaw，theconflictofrightshasbecomeauniversalphenomenon，鋤dwidelyexists

2、ineverypaftoflegalsystem，especiallyexistsinthejudicia“rial，thcadminist豫tivelawenforcementandthedailyIifeweshouldgivethis1egalphenomenonmoreattention，becauseitinVoivesaseriesoftheorctic鋤dtherealisticquestions耵1isanicIewiI

3、la11alysisandstudythequestionfromt鵬easpects，、Ⅳhichis：thcorigino九herightconnict；thereasonthatwhythisquestionissodimculttobesolVed，aIldtheselectiontothenewresearchtechniquethrou曲thatthequestioncanbesolVedwell；aSwellashowto

4、carriesontheconnictofrightsquestion柚alyzestllIouglIeconomica11aIysisFjrS￡，thisarljcJeslaftsfbmseveraJtypica】cases，whichhascarriedontheprcliminarydiscussiontotheconflictofrightsquestion，andpointedoutfromwhataspectsweshoul

5、dstantheconnictofri曲tsquestionresearch，a11dexplainedthefundamentalresearchmentalityoftheauthorandtheresearchscopeofthjsarticIeSecond，thmughdiscussingthebaSicreasonthatcausetherightconnictquestionandcurrcntIegaIsoIutionof

6、ourcountrytothisquestion，tIlisarticIepointcdoutthedenciencyofourcountry’straditionrightspmtectedmode：acknowledgedprotecting一impIements；furthe“nore，theauthorpmposedtheinterconnectoftherights，andpointedoutthehannisalsomutu

7、alIfthejudgeonlyconsideredprotectingsomesidelitigant。sbene6t，“isnotenoughforredressingthescales，thejudgemustcarryonthecomparisontothebothpansIbenefitloss，andselectttIewaythatcanaVojdabiggerharnl，butinthissitua“onnewsolut

8、ionswillbeneededThird，thisaniclehasmadeasystemintroductiontotheLawEconomic，alsomadeadetailedinterpretationtoseVeraIeconomicsconceptsfrequentlyusedinthisanicIe，whjchjncJudi力gtbeopponunjtycost，theruJeofsocjaJutililydecreas

9、esprogrcssiveJyandNashequiIibriumandsoon；then，t11eauthorcommentsandanalyzestheCoasetheoremandtheHandformulawhichismostoRenusedinlaweconomicanaIysis，alsoproposedtheresearchmentalitywhichisbasedonminimizingthesocialcost，F(xiàn)i

10、nally，theauthoranalysistheseVeraltypicalcasesquotedinthebeginningofthearticleagain，afldinitialJyproposedthetwosoiutionstoconnictofrights—Carriesontheequityofrightsbasedonrightrestrictionprinciple；andcarrIesonthetrcatyofr

11、jghtsbasedontheprimitiVelyapponionoftherightsAnercomparingtwomethodsthmughtheeconomicanalysis，theauthorthoughtequityshouldp“OrtotheothcrmethodsinsolVingtheconnictofrightScase，anenvards，theauthorsummariZedtheresponsjbiljt

12、ytakenmodeindealingwiththeconflictofrights1ntheendofthisanicle，theauthOrpointedoutinhisconclusionthatthelegaleconomicafIalysismethodgenerallyisonlysuitablefortheconnictofrightsincivillawdomain，butregardingsolutiontociVil