完善我國(guó)反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法一般條款研究-畢業(yè)論文

1、1完善我國(guó)反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法一般條款研究完善我國(guó)反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法一般條款研究1993年第八屆全國(guó)人大常委會(huì)通過(guò)了《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》，至今已有整整20年了。在該法通過(guò)之初，我國(guó)的市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)剛剛開(kāi)始建設(shè)，《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》為我國(guó)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的建設(shè)提供了寶貴的指引，規(guī)范了當(dāng)時(shí)可以說(shuō)是混亂的市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。但是20年過(guò)去了，市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)日益完善，競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為日益復(fù)雜，《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》在面對(duì)新的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為時(shí)漸有力不從心之態(tài)。我國(guó)現(xiàn)行的《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》中，規(guī)定了11種不正

2、當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為。面對(duì)其他的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為，《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》沒(méi)有明確的規(guī)定如何加以調(diào)整。新形勢(shì)下，要求我們《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》需要一個(gè)一般條款，將新出現(xiàn)的不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為通過(guò)一般條款納入法律調(diào)整范圍之中。本文通過(guò)對(duì)國(guó)外一些國(guó)家反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法中一般條款立法模式進(jìn)行分析，提出對(duì)我國(guó)一般條款完善的建議。文章第一部分對(duì)一般條款進(jìn)行基本的闡釋。通過(guò)對(duì)一般條款的由來(lái)進(jìn)行論述，進(jìn)而拓展出一般條款的一些含義，分析一般條款的一些特征。通過(guò)法律角度、市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)角度等論證反

3、不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法一般條款存在的理論基礎(chǔ)。最后提出一般條款市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)中和法律實(shí)踐中所發(fā)揮的作用。文章第二部分主要是介紹一些西方國(guó)家關(guān)于一般條款的一些規(guī)定。首先是介紹美國(guó)、德國(guó)、瑞士、希臘等國(guó)反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法中關(guān)于一般條款的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定。從這些國(guó)家的立法模式中我們可以得出結(jié)論：要想使《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》能夠涵蓋新出現(xiàn)的不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為，能夠與時(shí)俱進(jìn)，就需要制定一條一般條款。世界上主要的市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)國(guó)家通過(guò)一般條款加列舉的方式來(lái)調(diào)整不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為。這對(duì)于我國(guó)

4、的《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》是一個(gè)有益的探索。文章第三部分主要是對(duì)不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為進(jìn)行分析，同時(shí)在理論上分析我國(guó)是否存在一般條款。根據(jù)我國(guó)法學(xué)理論界對(duì)于《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》是否存在一般條款的學(xué)說(shuō)的論證分析，筆者更傾向于我國(guó)《反不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法》存在著一條“有限的一般條款”。然后通過(guò)對(duì)不正當(dāng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)行為主體、客體的分析，來(lái)明確3CivilCommercialLawProfessionalGraduateGraduate：InstructInstruct：In

5、1993eighthsessionoftheNPCStingCommitteepassedthe“AntiUnfairCompetitionLaw”hasbeenafull20years.Inthismethodthebeginningthemarketeconomyofourcountryhasjuststartedconstruction“AntiUnfairCompetitionLaw”providesvaluableguidan

6、ceftheconstructionofChinasmarketeconomyspecificationthatcanbesaidtobechaoticmarketcompetition.Overthepast20yearsthemarketeconomycompetitionisbecomingmemecomplex“AntiUnfairCompetitionLaw“inthefaceofcompetitionnewgradually

7、whennotfromtheheartstate.Chinesecurrent“AntiUnfairCompetitionLaw”theprovisionsofthe11kindsofactsofunfaircompetition.Facingthecompetitivebehaviofothers“AntiUnfairCompetitionLaw”isnotclearlydefinedhowtoadjust.thenewsituati

8、onwe“AntiUnfairCompetitionLaw”theneedfageneralprovisiontheactofunfaircompetitionemergingthroughthegeneralclauseincludedinthescopeoflegalregulation.Basedonsomefeigncountriesantiunfaircompetitionlawgeneraltermsoflegislatio

9、nmodeanalysisputfwardtothegeneralprovisionsofoursuggestions.Thefirstpartofthegeneralclauseoftheinterpretationofthebasic.Throughthediscussionoftheiginofthegeneralclausethendevelopsomemeaningingeneraltermsanalyzesomefeatur

10、esofthegeneralclause.Theeticalfoundationoftheargumentbyalegalpointofviewtheperspectiveofthemarketeconomygeneralclauseofantiunfaircompetitionlaw.Finallythegeneraltermsconditionsofmarketeconomylegalpracticeintherole.Thesec

11、ondpartofthearticlemainlyintroducessomeprovisionsinsomewesterncountriesaboutthegeneralclause.ThefirstistointroducetherelevantlegalprovisionsonthegeneralclauseinantiunfaircompetitionlawintheUnitedStatesGermanySwitzerlGree