一部蘇格拉底式的著作——論哲學(xué)研究的“古代精神

1、學(xué) 校 代 碼 ：10 270 分 類 號(hào) ：B561.59 學(xué) 號(hào) ：122201239一部蘇格拉底式的著作？一 論 《 哲學(xué)研究》的“ 古代精神學(xué) 院 ：哲 學(xué) 學(xué) 院專 業(yè) ：外 國(guó) 哲 學(xué) _________研 究 方 向 ：早 期 分 析 哲 學(xué)研 究 生 姓 名 ：張 哲 ________________指 導(dǎo) 教 師 ：劉 云 卿 _____________完 成 日 期 ：2 0 1 5 年 4 月 ____

2、______上海師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文 AbstractAbstr a ctDifferent from most of the modern philosophical works, Philosophical Investigations has a unique and distinct overall posture, which cannot be grasped by getting hold of every piece

3、 of thesis in this book. The latter (every piece of thesis) is actually not a path to the former (overall posture) at all, but will be knocked down and transported to their own larger arguments separately, which has been

4、 testified by most of the Wittgensteinian study. I will clarify that if we omit the overall posture of Philosophical Investigations, we will turn a blind eye to those questions which are extremely pressing to Wittgenstei

5、n and ourselves. I chose a position like viewing deck, different from the typical attention on thesis of Philosophical Investigations, which means referring to the spirit of the whole ancient philosophy especially repres

6、ented by S ocrates way of philosophy and grasping those can be only grasped in a broader view-what kind of work Philosophical Investigations is, including the philosophical aim and way to realize it in Philosophical Inve

7、stigations.The first question is about the spirit of ancient philosophy, which reveals typically in the philosophical activities of S ocrates. H e cultivates the self-community by involving in dialogues, in other words,

8、the participation into public thing, which means that ancient philosophy is not naturally the meditation on essence, but cultivation of self-living. In Pierre H adot’swords, ancient philosophy is a way of life.The second

9、 question is how could Philosophical Investigations be taken as dialogue, which will be backed up by evidence from rhetoric and philosophy of language. The rhetorical analysis will back up such point: there exist two dif

10、ferent voices in PI, even though that both of them are made by the same person—Wittgenstein, we can still take PI as dialogue because of the obvious and critical responsive relation between them. In the field of philosop

11、hy of language, analysis about the real daily dialogue indicates that “responsiveness” is a substantial feature, which can never be put into insight of the “idealized view of language”， of daily dialogue that we involved

12、 in everyday. Therefore, the typical anti-theoretical way of PI will be supported in both of those two sides.The final questions is how does Philosophical Investigations has spiritual intimacy with S ocrate dialogues. W