時效抗辯的限制問題研究.pdf

1、西南政法大學碩士學位論文時效抗辯的限制問題研究導師:孫鵬教授作者:伍學蜻中國重慶二00八年四月AbstraCtThefirstPartofthesisbeginswithacommonease，themainProblemwhichthePrefaee15goingtesolve15，15thereanynecessarytestrietdemurrablerightofPrescriPtionAndhowtestrietdemurra

2、blerightofPreseriPtionThesecondPartofthesisanalyzestherestrictingneeessaryofdemurrablerightofPreseriPtionfromthePersPectiveofvalueconflictofthePreseriPtionsystem.ThePrescriPtionsystem15theresultofvalueconflietoflaw，asfor

3、itfirstchooseorderandeffieiency，theremustbesomeconflietswithothervalues，suehasfair.ThistellsustogiveaeonsiderationtotheneglectedvaluesbeeauseofaeeePtingthesystem，notonlyinlegislation，butalsoinjudicatureThethirdPartofthes

4、isanalyzedtherestrietingnecessaryofdemurrablerightofpreseriPtionasarightfromthePerspeetiveofPrescriptioneounterargumentessentialPeculiarity.AnyrightcanbeusedimProPerlyandbecausethisright1550sPeeial，weshouldbemoreearefulw

5、henweuseitintheProcessofjudicature.TheforthPartofthesisPointedoutallkindsofsocialabusesfromrealPersPeetive，thatifyouusethedemurrablerightofPreseriPtionimProPerl又esPeciallywhenit15usedbyevilintentions，itwillaggravatetheer

6、isisofsoeialcredit，itwillmakeunnecessarywasteofjudicature.Therefe，intheharmoniousconstructingofsoeietydays，therestrietingusingofPrescriPtioneounterargumentimProPerly15verymeaningful.ThefifthandthesixthPartsofthesisleadin

7、tothePrinciPleofgoodfaithandthePrinciPletoProhibittheabuseofrights，andresearehonhowtestrictthePreseriPtioneounterargument.Thethesisadvancedthatasarightoftheaccused，PreseriPtioneanonlybeadvaneedbytheaecused.Aftertheaccuse