中國(guó)當(dāng)代法官職業(yè)思維探析.pdf

1、河北師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文中國(guó)當(dāng)代法官職業(yè)思維探析姓名：韓金澎申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：馬克思主義基本原理指導(dǎo)教師：趙立新20121203AbstractWiththedeepeningofthecauseofsocialistmodernization，theruleoflawinChinahasachievedrapidSuccess，thestudyoflawisnolongermerelytheinstitutionallevel，

2、andmoreconcemedabouttheideologicallevelInthefieldofjustice，thecourtinwhichtheimportantposition，itcarlbesaidthatthelastbulwarkofsocietyandthestatusofjudgesisbecomingmoreandmoreimportant，howthejudgesarethinkinghowtofaceall

3、typesofcases，howtomakeafairruling，etc，becomemoreandmoreanissueofconcernMinxhadraisedawarenessofpeople’SactionscounterproductiveThesamejudgecareerthinkin。gtojudgetherefereeactivitiesagreatinfluenceonthejudges’professional

4、thinkingisasystematicprojeelalltheactivitiesofthejudgesneedtohavetherightframeofmindasguidance，tOstudyjudgesoccupationalthinking，toanalyzeitsdifferentfromotherprofessionalthinkingcharacteristics，andthenaskedthejudges’pro

5、fessionalthinkingnurturingpath，itisextremelynecessarvThepaperisdividedintothreepartsThefirstpartofthejudges’professionalthinkingOverviewThepartofthemainanalysisconceptsandcharacteristicsofthejudgesthinkingthejudgesthinki

6、ngisakindoflegalthinking，itreferstotheactivitiesoftheadministrationofjusfice，thejudgeSongzhengcasestargeting，inaccordancewiththerulesofjudicialnotice，todeterminethecasesrealitylookingapplicablelawtheuseofawayofthinkingan

7、dtheprocessoflegalapproachesandskillstodealwithdisputesThejudges’professionalthinkingonthesignificanceoftheruleoflawThesecondpart，theChinesecontemporaryjudges’professionalthinkingThatpartfirstdiscussesthethecontemporaryt

8、heChinesejudgesoccupationalcharacteristicsofthinking，suchaspeoplethought，balancedandthought；madesomeanalysisfollowedbytheerrorofthinkingoncontemporaryChinesejudges；Finallytheanalysisofthevariousfactorsthatinfluencethejud

9、ges’professionalthinkingThroughtheaboveanalysis，Canfullyunderstandthestatusquoofourjudges’professionalthinkingThethirdpartofthethinkingofcontemporarycareerjudgeperfectcountermeasuresChinesejudges’professionalthinkingcons