版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請進行舉報或認領(lǐng)
文檔簡介
1、<p><b> 中文3000字</b></p><p> 本科畢業(yè)論文外文翻譯</p><p> 外文題目: Terms of trade and economic growth in Japan and Korea:an empirical analysis &
2、lt;/p><p> 出 處: Empir Econ (2010) 38:139–158 </p><p> 作 者: Hock Tsen Wong </p><p>
3、<b> 原 文:</b></p><p> Terms of trade and economic growth in Japan and Korea:an empirical analysis</p><p> 1 .Introduction</p><p> Terms of trade and terms of trade
4、volatility have a critical impact on economic growth, particularly during world episodes of global integration or disintegration when export prices converge or diverge worldwide, inducing large terms of trade changes and
5、economy-wide responses . However, their in?uence is ambiguous. An increase in terms of trade could either lead to an increase or a decrease in economic growth. Generally, an increase in terms of trade will lead to an inc
6、rease in investment and th</p><p> Eicher et al.develop an inter-temporal model to examine the impact of a decrease in terms of trade on current account and output, with the focus on a developing country. T
7、he model shows that a decrease in terms of trade will have a negative effect on income and wealth. In the long run, a decrease in terms of trade will lead to a proportional decrease in the debt level of an economy whilst
8、 output, capital, and borrowing will not change. Thus a change in terms of trade will only affect economic gr</p><p> Empirical studies into the impact of terms of trade and terms of trade volatility on eco
9、nomic growth are dominated by cross-country research. Nonetheless, it is interesting to examine the impact of terms of trade and terms of trade volatility on a particular economy. This study examines the impact of terms
10、of trade on real gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Japan and Korea using time series data. Japan is a relatively large closed economy whilst Korea is a relatively small open economy. </p><p> The e
11、mpirical estimation is based on an augmented production function . The Dickey and Fuller and Phillips and Perron unit root test statistics are used to examine the stationarity of the data. The ohansen cointegration metho
12、d is used to examine the long-run relationship between terms of trade and real GDP per capita. The cointegration method is able to test the existence of more than one cointegrating vector in a system.The generalised fore
13、cast error variance decomposition and generalised impul</p><p> This article is organised as follows. Section 2 discusses the literature review of terms of trade and economic growth. Section 3 explains the
14、methodology and data in this study. Section4 presents empirical results and discussions. Section 5 provides some concluding remarks. </p><p> 2. Literature review of terms of trade and economic growth</p
15、><p> There are many studies on the relationship between terms of trade and economic growth. Mendoza examines the impact of terms of trade on economic growth in 40 industrial and developing countries using cr
16、oss-sectional data for the period 1971–1991. The results show a positive impact of terms of trade on economic growth. Moreover, terms of trade shocks are reported to account for nearly half the changes in actual GDP. Fur
17、thermore, economic growth is found to be slower in countries with higher term</p><p> On the other hand, Blattman et al. analyse more than half a century of pre-World War II data, 1870–1938, for 35 countrie
18、s. They ?nd that terms of trade have a significant impact on economic growth. Moreover, the impact of terms of trade is greater on the periphery than in the core. A decline in terms of trade experienced by the periphery
19、represented a significant drag on economic growth during those seven decades. Furthermore, there is asymmetry between the core and the periphery. Terms of trade</p><p> Turnovsky and Chattopadhyay examine t
20、he impact of various sources of volatility on economic growth in a sample of 61 less developed countries for the period 1975–1992. The data analysed are annually. They also separate the sample into two sub-samples, namel
21、y 31 high volatility countries and 30 low volatility countries. An increase in terms of trade is found to have a weak impact on economicgrowth, and there is no significant evidence that governmentexpenditure or monetary
22、growth has any impact. </p><p> Urban (2007, p. 471) examines theoretically and empirically the medium and long-run relationship between terms of trade and income in industrialised countries. The study offe
23、rs two theoretical channels, which relate the terms of trade to income growth in a stochastic and dynamic general equilibrium model with ?exible terms of trade.The home market effect predicts that countries with a faster
24、 economic growth will have real appreciation of their terms of trade. The productivity shock effect predic</p><p> 3 .Methodology and data</p><p> In this study, the impact of terms of trade o
25、n economic growth is examined based on an augmented production function.8 More specifically, this study examines three vectors. The ?rst vector includes real GDP per capita, labour,capital, terms of trade, oil price, and
26、 ?nancial development. The second vector includes the same variables as in the ?rst vector, except that terms of trade is replaced by terms of trade volatility, which is measured by the moving standard </p><p&
27、gt; deviation with order four, that is, MSD(4). The third vector includes the same variables as in the second vector, except that terms of trade volatility is measured by the Generalised Autoregressive Conditional Hete
28、roscedasticity model, that is, GARCH(1,1). </p><p> It has been documented that changes in oil price have been closely related to macroeconomic performance. Backus and Crucini use a dynamic general equilibr
29、ium model and ?nd that oil price accounts for much of the variation in terms of trade over the last 25 years and its quantitative role varies significantly over time. Moreover, they report that during the period 1972–198
30、7, terms of trade of industrialised countries were driven mainly by changes in oil price. Furthermore, the increased volatilit</p><p> A sound ?nancial system is important for economic growth. Financial sys
31、tems: (1) facilitate the trading, hedging, diversifying, and pooling of risk; (2) allocate resources; (3) monitor managers and exert corporation control; (4) mobilise saving; and (5) facil- itate the exchange of goods an
32、d services (Levine 1997). The increased availability of ?nancial instruments and institutions reduces transaction and information costs in an economy. Nonetheless, empirical ?ndings on the relationship between</p>
33、<p> The DF unit root test statistic is used to examine the stationarity of the data. The cointegration method is used to examine the long-run relationship among variables ina vector. The cointegration method prop
34、oses two likelihood ratio tests to test the number of cointegrating vectors in the system</p><p> If there are two cointegrating vectors in a vector, the ?rst cointegrating vector shall be identi?ed by norm
35、alising real GDP per capita and the second cointegrating vector shall be identi?ed by normalising terms of trade. The ?rst cointegrating vector is normalised based on the argument that economic growth of an economy can b
36、e estimated using an augmented production function and the second cointegrating vector is normalised based on the argument that terms of trade is strongly in?uenced by oil </p><p><b> 譯 文:</b>
37、</p><p> 貿(mào)易及經(jīng)濟增長在日本和韓國的實證分析</p><p><b> 1.簡介</b></p><p> 貿(mào)易條款及貿(mào)易波動條款對經(jīng)濟增長具有重要影響,特別是在全世界的出口價格收斂或發(fā)散的全球一體化或解體時期,包括誘導(dǎo)貿(mào)易的變化和整個經(jīng)濟的反應(yīng)。然而,它們的影響是模糊地。在貿(mào)易方面的增加可能導(dǎo)致增加或減少經(jīng)濟增長。一般而言,
38、貿(mào)易方面的增加將導(dǎo)致投資的增加,因此經(jīng)濟增長也將增加。Mendoza , Bleaney ,Greenaway 和Blattman等其他人的報告指出貿(mào)易條件對經(jīng)濟增長產(chǎn)生積極的影響。</p><p> Eicher等人開發(fā)一個跨時空模型來探討貿(mào)易條件的下降對活期存款賬戶和輸出地影響,重點是發(fā)展中國家。該模型表明,貿(mào)易條件的下降將對收入和財富有負面影響。從長遠來看,貿(mào)易條件的下降將導(dǎo)致資本負債水平的比例減少,資本
39、產(chǎn)出和不變的借貸。因此,貿(mào)易條件的變化僅僅影響短期的經(jīng)濟增長而不是長期的經(jīng)濟增長。波動性高的貿(mào)易條件將導(dǎo)致資源配置的輸入和輸出,這是因為規(guī)避風(fēng)險。但最重要的是因為對沖市場的不完整性。</p><p> 貿(mào)易條件和貿(mào)易波動方面對經(jīng)濟增長的影響的實證研究在跨國研究中占主導(dǎo)地位。然而,有意思的是檢驗貿(mào)易條件和貿(mào)易波動條件對特定的經(jīng)濟的影響。本研究采用時間序列數(shù)據(jù)探討了在日本和韓國的實際人均GDP對貿(mào)易條件的影響。日本
40、是一個大的封閉經(jīng)濟體,而韓國式一個相對較小的開放型經(jīng)濟體。此外,日本在過去十年內(nèi)實現(xiàn)的經(jīng)濟增長率較低,而韓國已取得了相對較高的經(jīng)濟增長速度。因此,本文獻提供了一些關(guān)于貿(mào)易條件對經(jīng)濟增長的增加或降低是否具有重要意義的證據(jù)。不同的經(jīng)濟體系認為貿(mào)易條件對經(jīng)濟增長的影響是不同的。此外,本研究探討了貿(mào)易波動的條件對實際人均GDP的影響。另外,探討石油價格和金融發(fā)展對實際人均GDP的影響。日本和韓國都是石油進口國。因此,本研究提供了有關(guān)于石油價格對
41、相對大的封閉經(jīng)濟和相對小的開放經(jīng)濟的經(jīng)濟增長的影響。</p><p> 實證估計是基于擴展的一條生產(chǎn)函數(shù)。Dickey ,F(xiàn)uller ,Phillips 和 Perron用單位根統(tǒng)計量來檢驗數(shù)據(jù)的平穩(wěn)性。Johansen的協(xié)整方法被用來研究貿(mào)易條件和實際GDP之間的長期關(guān)系。協(xié)整方法能夠測試存在在日本和韓國多個系統(tǒng)的貿(mào)易條件和經(jīng)濟增長。廣義預(yù)測誤差分解和廣義沖響應(yīng)函數(shù)用來檢查系統(tǒng)中的變量關(guān)系。廣義預(yù)測誤差分解
42、和廣義沖響應(yīng)函數(shù)解決了預(yù)測誤差方差分解和脈沖響應(yīng)函數(shù)的問題。但問題在于后者的方法是對向量自歸系統(tǒng)的變量順序敏感的。</p><p> 本文介紹結(jié)構(gòu)如下:第二節(jié)回顧了討論貿(mào)易條件和經(jīng)濟增長的文獻。第三節(jié)揭示了本研究的方法和數(shù)據(jù)。第四節(jié)呈現(xiàn)實證的結(jié)果和討論的結(jié)論。第五節(jié)做總結(jié)。</p><p> 2.貿(mào)易條件和經(jīng)濟增長的文獻綜述</p><p> 這里有很多研究貿(mào)
43、易條件和經(jīng)濟增長之間關(guān)系的資料。Mendoza使用了1971年到1991年之間的橫截面數(shù)據(jù)來考察了貿(mào)易條件對40個工業(yè)發(fā)展中國家的經(jīng)濟增長的影響。結(jié)果顯示貿(mào)易條件對經(jīng)濟增長產(chǎn)生積極的影響。此外,貿(mào)易條件的沖擊被報道幾乎占實際GDP的一半的變化。還有經(jīng)濟增長緩慢的國際貿(mào)易條件波動高。Bleaney 和 Greenaway使用了1980年到1995年之間的橫截面數(shù)據(jù)來研究貿(mào)易條件對14個撒哈拉以南的非洲國家的經(jīng)濟增長的影響。他們發(fā)現(xiàn)貿(mào)易條件
44、的增加將導(dǎo)致經(jīng)濟增長的增加。Hadass 和 Williamson使用了1870年到1940男之間的橫截面數(shù)據(jù)來研究貿(mào)易條件和經(jīng)濟增長之間的關(guān)系。他們發(fā)現(xiàn)盡管貿(mào)易條件的流動有利于初級產(chǎn)品的出口,卻減少了出口國的經(jīng)濟增長。此外,還有核心和外圍之間不對稱的經(jīng)濟增長的有力證據(jù)。一般來說,貿(mào)易條件對核心和外圍的經(jīng)濟增長的影響非常的小。在戰(zhàn)前時期,用貿(mào)易條件的變化來解釋少于人均GDP的五分之一的增長速度的經(jīng)濟增長。然而,這項研究包含少數(shù)的仍然相當
45、于二戰(zhàn)時期貧困的發(fā)展中國家。</p><p> 在另一方面,Blattman等人分析了1870年到1937年超過半世紀的35個國家的世界大戰(zhàn)期間的數(shù)據(jù)。他們發(fā)現(xiàn)貿(mào)易條件對經(jīng)濟增長產(chǎn)生了重大影響。貿(mào)易條件對外圍的影響大于對核心的影響。一個貿(mào)易條件的下降所經(jīng)歷的邊緣代表七十年之間的經(jīng)濟增長的主要拖放。此外,還有核心和外圍之間的不對稱。貿(mào)易條件或貿(mào)易條件波動性似乎對核心作用不大,特別是貿(mào)易條件波動性幾乎對核心和外圍的
46、作用一樣。然而,貿(mào)易條件似乎已經(jīng)在解釋經(jīng)濟增長的外圍發(fā)揮了作用。核心能夠逃過貿(mào)易條件不穩(wěn)定性所造成的破壞性后果但顯然不能避免對周邊初級產(chǎn)品的出口。Blattman等人對35個國家在1870年到1939年之間的聘用期間的面板數(shù)據(jù)進行了分析。他們報告了與早些日子相同的結(jié)論。他們還發(fā)現(xiàn)貿(mào)易條件的長期變化對經(jīng)濟增長都產(chǎn)生了重大影響。貿(mào)易條件的長期變化對周邊的影響大于對核心的影響。然而,貿(mào)易條件的長期變化對經(jīng)濟增長的影響小于貿(mào)易條件波動性對經(jīng)濟增
47、長的影響。貿(mào)易條件對邊緣和核心的影響是不一樣的。</p><p> Turnovsky 和Chattopadhyay審查了來自61個欠發(fā)達的國家在1975年到1992年之間的各種波動性來源(產(chǎn)出的波動,貿(mào)易的波動,政府范圍的波動開支和貨幣的波動)對經(jīng)濟增長的影響。數(shù)據(jù)一年分析一次。他們還將分成31個高波動國家和30個低波國家這兩個子樣本。發(fā)現(xiàn)貿(mào)易條件的增加對經(jīng)濟增長的影響較小,也沒有顯著的證據(jù)表明政府的支出或貨
48、幣對供給增長有影響。然而,他們發(fā)現(xiàn)貿(mào)易條件的波動性,政府支出的波動和貨幣的波動對經(jīng)濟增長產(chǎn)生負面影響。波動性可能會降低資本的密集度,特別是當一個國家面臨債務(wù)上升的傾斜的供給曲線。貿(mào)易條件的平均速度對經(jīng)濟增長平均率具有弱陽性影響。Grimes探討了在新西蘭的貿(mào)易條件對經(jīng)濟增長的影響。結(jié)果顯示,大約超過45年的將近一半的全年GDP可以用貿(mào)易條件的波動性和水平解釋。四個經(jīng)濟體制的關(guān)系式健全的。</p><p> 理論
49、上和實際上探討貿(mào)易條件和收入在工業(yè)化國家之間的長期關(guān)系。這項研究提供了兩種理論渠道,涉及建立在隨機動態(tài)的一般均衡模型的貿(mào)易條件和收入的關(guān)系。國內(nèi)市場的影響預(yù)測國家的經(jīng)濟增長的發(fā)展會真實的反應(yīng)在它們的貿(mào)易條件上。生產(chǎn)率沖擊效應(yīng)預(yù)測國家貿(mào)易條件將隨著經(jīng)濟增長的增加而降低。</p><p><b> 3.方法和數(shù)據(jù)</b></p><p> 在這項研究中,探究貿(mào)易條件對
50、經(jīng)濟增長的影響基于一條增量生產(chǎn)函數(shù)。更具體地說,本文考察了三個向量。第一個向量包括實際GDP,勞動,資本,石油價格和金融發(fā)展。第二個向量與第一個向量一樣,只是將貿(mào)易條件波動性代替貿(mào)易條件,這是由移動標準差和四階取代的的,換而言之就是由MSD(4)條款取代的。第三個向量與第二個向量一樣,但貿(mào)易波動條件有廣義異方差回歸模型計算,換而言之就是GARCH(1,1).9模型。</p><p> 據(jù)記載,石油價格的變化與宏
51、觀經(jīng)濟的表現(xiàn)密切相關(guān)。Backus 和Crucini使用了一般均衡動態(tài)模型找到了是在過去25年里的不同的貿(mào)易條件引起的石油的價格在很大程度的定量作用格式不相同的。此外,他么還報告在1972年至1987年期間,工業(yè)化國家的貿(mào)易條件主要來自于石油價格的變化。而且,自從布雷頓森林體系的結(jié)束以來貿(mào)易條件波動的增加似乎主要是由于石油價格波動的增加而不是由于名義或?qū)嶋H匯率波動的增加。因此,石油價格是確定貿(mào)易條件的重要因素。</p>&
52、lt;p> 一個健全的金融體系對經(jīng)濟增長很重要。財務(wù)制度:(1)便利的交易,套期保值,分散和承擔(dān)風(fēng)險;(2)分配資源;(3)監(jiān)督管理和發(fā)揮公司的控制作用;(4)動員儲蓄;(5)促進貨物和服務(wù)的交流。利用增加的金融工具和制度來減少經(jīng)濟的交易和信息成本。然而,根據(jù)實證研究發(fā)現(xiàn)發(fā)展金融和經(jīng)濟增長之間的關(guān)系。</p><p> 用DF單位根統(tǒng)計量來檢驗數(shù)據(jù)的平穩(wěn)性。這個協(xié)整方法是用來研究向量與變量之間的長期關(guān)系
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 外文翻譯--貿(mào)易及經(jīng)濟增長在日本和韓國的實證分析
- 貿(mào)易開放和經(jīng)濟增長一個跨國實證調(diào)查【外文翻譯】
- 貿(mào)易結(jié)構(gòu)與經(jīng)濟增長【外文翻譯】
- 貿(mào)易量與貿(mào)易政策對經(jīng)濟增長的分析【外文翻譯】
- 金融學(xué)外文翻譯------加工貿(mào)易與經(jīng)濟增長基于中國的實證分析
- 貿(mào)易和增長的實證研究政策建議在哪里?【外文翻譯】
- 服務(wù)貿(mào)易和增長【外文翻譯】
- 外文翻譯--fdi和貿(mào)易對經(jīng)濟增長的影響來自發(fā)展中國家的實證分析
- 外文翻譯--fdi和貿(mào)易對經(jīng)濟增長的影響:來自發(fā)展中國家的實證分析
- fdi和貿(mào)易對經(jīng)濟增長的影響來自發(fā)展中國家的實證分析【外文翻譯】
- 出口、進口和經(jīng)濟增長的因果關(guān)系基于轉(zhuǎn)型經(jīng)濟的實證分析【外文翻譯】
- 機構(gòu)、貿(mào)易及增長【外文翻譯】
- 紡織品貿(mào)易和經(jīng)濟增長方式【外文翻譯】
- 中國的機械對外貿(mào)易和經(jīng)濟增長【外文翻譯】
- 中國進口貿(mào)易與經(jīng)濟增長的理論和實證分析.pdf
- 韓國能源消費與經(jīng)濟增長關(guān)系的實證分析.pdf
- 出口和經(jīng)濟增長【外文翻譯】
- 服務(wù)貿(mào)易的開放度與經(jīng)濟增長【外文翻譯】
- 我國進口貿(mào)易促進經(jīng)濟增長的實證分析.pdf
- 稅制結(jié)構(gòu)和經(jīng)濟增長【外文翻譯】
評論
0/150
提交評論