我國制藥企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)研究.pdf

1、上海交通大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文我國制藥企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)研究姓名：張蕊申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：管理科學(xué)與工程指導(dǎo)教師：田澎20060118上海交通大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文我國制藥企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)研究ABSTRACTIntheindustrialeconomycompetitionbetweencompanieswasbasedonthematerialscapital.Thepresentturnofthecenturytherefeisapivotalp

2、eriodwhenhumansocietytransfmedintotheknowledgebasedeconomy.Themostimptantelementsarethepossessioncontrolproductionutilityofknowledgeintellectualresources.Chinaspharmaceuticalindustryisfacedwithboththeinternalexternalenvi

3、ronmentinthreeareas:policyenvironmentpositioninthewldspharmaceuticalindustrychallengeaftertheentryofWTO.CurrentlyChinaisabletoproduceabout1500typesofcrudedrugs.However97percentofthemareimitatedhavenopatentprotection.thep

4、harmaceuticalindustryisfacingtheoutstingcontradictionsofduplicatedconstruction.Asinthiscaseresearchesoncompetitivenessmustbedeepenedtogreatlyimprovetheoverallpharmaceuticalindustry.Inaprincipleofcombiningqualitativestudy

5、withquantitativestudytheeticanalysiswithintuitivethethesisfocusedtheinfluentialfactsoncompetitivenessacompleteevaluationindexsystemfpharmaceuticalcompanycompetitivenessispresentedwithsomecasestudiesftheexplationofevaluat

6、ingmethod.Maincontentsconclusionsinclude：1.Basedonthereviewofresearchesoncompetitivenessthisthesisstsoutvarioustheiesevaluationindexsystems.Systemanalysismethodisadopted:“CompetitivenesstheyCompetitivenesselementsCompeti

7、tivenessevaluationindexCompetitivenessevaluationmodel”.ThisthesisdefinestheconceptfeatureofcompetitivenessfthethreepharmaceuticalindustriesofchemistrybiotechaswellastraditionalChinesemedicine.2.Uptonowmostoftheotherstudi

8、esonevaluatingindexofcompanycompetitivenessarefocusonlyononecertainaspectwhichmakethemlackingtheeticalconsistencyintegrality.Afteranalyzingspecialists’viewpointsontheiginofthecompanycompetitivenessthethesisexpleboththein

9、ternalexternalresourcesthedirectindirectresourcesofthem.Thenitconstructstheindexsystemfpharmaceuticalcompanies.Inawayoffitnessutilityconveniencethethesishasdesignedtheevaluatingindexincludingbothfinancialindexnonfinancia

10、lindexofwhichneverappearedinanyotherpreviousresearches.3.Whenusingfinancialindextoevaluatecompanycompetitivenessmulticollinearityexists.Multicollinearityi.e.thelackofindependencebetweenvariancesisacausetotheinaccuracyofr

11、egressionmodelswhichsetsobstaclesintheapplicationofstatisticalmethodstoevaluationofcpationcompetence.Inthisthesisthreemethodsdealingwithmulticollinearityareintroducedincludingridgeregressionprincipalcomponentregressionpa

12、rtialleastsquaresregressionfactanalysis.Thesemethodsarecomparedonmodelinterpretabilityreliabilityotheraspectsthroughanempiricalstudy.Asfnonfinancialindexstructuralequationmodeling(SEM)isintroducedtofmasecondderfactmodel.

13、Withthisapproachthethesisgivesananalysisabouttheapplicationinevaluatingthecompanycompetitiveness.4.Thecustomersatisfactionindexcouldbetreatedasabarometerofbothfinancialnonfinancialperfmanceofacompany.Thethesisseeksthelin

14、ksbetweencustomersatisfactioncompanyperfmanceusecustomersatisfactionindexasameasureofcompanycompetitiveness.Researchrelatedwithevaluatingcompanycompetitivenesshasbeencarriedonfseveralyearsprogressessubstantiality.Itinvol