戰(zhàn)略管理領(lǐng)域的結(jié)構(gòu)和演化26年來戰(zhàn)略管理內(nèi)容分析研究【外文翻譯】

1、外文翻譯外文翻譯原文Thestructureevolutionofthestrategicmanagementfield:Acontentanalysisof26yearsofstrategicmanagementresearchMaterialSource:InternationalJournalofManagementReviews(2008)Auth:OlivierFurrerHowardThomasAnnaGoussevskai

2、aThispaperanalyses26yearsofstrategicmanagementresearchpublishedinAcademyofManagementJournalAcademyofManagementReviewAdministrativeScienceQuarterlyStrategicManagementJournal.Throughacontentanalysisitstudiestherelationship

3、sbetweenthesubfieldsofstrategicmanagement.Amultiplecrespondenceanalysisprovidesamapofkeywdsauthsaframewktotrackthisliteratureoverthe26yearperiod.Adiscussionoffuturepathwaysinthestrategicmanagementliteratureisalsoprovided

4、.IntroductionThepurposeofthispaperistostudytheevolutionofthestrategicmanagementliteraturebasedonananalysisofthecontentofthepast26yearsofstrategicmanagementresearchpublishedintheleadingjournalsinthefieldnamelytheAcademyof

5、ManagementJournal(AMJ)AcademyofManagementReview(AMR)AdministrativeScienceQuarterly(ASQ)theStrategicManagementJournal(SMJ).Thepaperservesnotonlytoassessthestructurepastevolutionofthecontentofthestrategicmanagementfieldits

6、differentsubfieldsbutalsopresentssomeconjecturesaboutfurtherdevelopmentsinthisliterature.Byhelpingstrategicmanagementscholarstounderstbetterthedirectioninwhichthefieldisgoingwherethegapsarethepaperisintendedtoprovideagui

7、delinefscholarsinpositioningtheirfutureresearcheffts.Wetherefefocusontwoquestions.FirstwhatisthecontenttheevolutionofstrategicmanagementresearchSecondwhohaspublishedmostintheliteratureofstrategicmanagementwhatwastheircon

8、tributiontotheevolutionofthefieldThefirstquestioninvolvesaclassificationofarticlestoevaluatedisciplinaryevolutiontodeterminetheexpostfactopriitiesofauthseditsrewswaslaterrewritteninaseparatebookTheConceptofCpateStrategy(

9、1971)(Rumeltetal.1994).Withtheseauthsresearchshiftsfromadeterministiconebestwayapproachtoamecontingentperspectivewhereganizationsneedtoadapttotheirexternalenvironment.Howeverthesestudiesweremanageriallyientedwithanemphas

10、isonnmativepreionratherthanonanalysis.Basedmainlyonindepthcasestudiesofsinglefirmsindustriestheresultsofthesestudiesarehardlygeneralizable.Inresponsetothisissueofgeneralizabilityduringthe1970satransitionstartedtowardsare

11、searchientation.Thisperiodcanbeacterizedbythedevelopmentofadichotomybetweentwosetsofresearchbasedonverydifferentontologicalepistemologicalperspectives.Oneviewpursueda‘processapproach’whichconsistedessentiallyofdeivestudi

12、esofhowstrategieswerefmedimplemented.Thisresearchbasedontheobservationofactualganizationaldecisionmakingledtomerealisticconceptionsofprocessinwhichstrategieswerearrivedatindirectlytosomedegreeunintentionally.Quinn’s(1980

13、)‘logicalincrementalism’MintzbergWaters’s(19781985)‘emergentstrategy’areexamplesofsuchstudies.Atthesametimeastreamofresearchseekingtoundersttherelationshipbetweenstrategyperfmancealsostartedtodevelop.Departingfromtheanal

14、ysisofcasestudiesofasinglefirmindustrythisdeductivelargescalestatisticalresearchdevelopedtestedhypothesesbasedonmodelsabstractedfromthestructure–conduct–perfmance(S–C–P)paradigm(Bain19561964Mason19391949)dominantinthelit

15、eratureofindustrialganization(IO)economics(Pter1981).Pter(e.g.197919801985)hasmadethemostinfluentialcontributionstothefield.UsingastructuralapproachPter(1980)outlinesaframewkthatcanbeusedinunderstingthestructureofanindus

16、tryisausefulanalyticaltoolfassessinganindustry’sattractivenessfacilitatingcompetitanalysis.Inthismannertheprimaryfocusofstrategicmanagementduringthisperiodwasontheenvironmentitsrelationshipwithafirm.Howeverfromthe1980son

17、wardsstrategyresearchstartedtochangeitsdirectiononceme.Studiesswitchedtheirfocusfromindustrystructureasaunitofanalysistothatofthefirm’sinternalstructureresourcescapabilities.Becauseoftheirfocusonfirms’internalganizationt