農(nóng)民工攻擊行為的社會(huì)認(rèn)知特點(diǎn)研究

1、西北師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文農(nóng)民工攻擊行為的社會(huì)認(rèn)知特點(diǎn)研究姓名：丁吉紅申請學(xué)位級別：碩士專業(yè)：應(yīng)用心理學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：周愛保2008-05Abstract With the establishment of a dominant position of Cognitive Psychology in Psychological Research, the cognitive factors of affecting aggression ar

2、e gradually paid attention. As there are some contradictions and conflicts between human civilization and aggression, cognitive factors are unconsciously areas in some extent. Aggression is a very important issue from th

3、e perspective of implicit social cognition. Foreign research shows that early individual aggression is a better predictor of adult violent crime. Since the 1990s, the problem of peasant workers gradually became the hot s

4、pots in the academic field and the community. And the works about it are also endless. When they made special contributions to the city, they commit crime to the harmonious society. It has caused widespread concern in so

5、ciety. My study is the experiment on aggression from the implicit social cognition. The implicit aggression is measured by the Implicit Association Test (IAT). The explicit aggression is measured by self-report questionn

6、aire measurement. The goal of the study is to find whether there is some intention to the aggressive material on the IAT compared with the conclusion acquired by the other method previously on the implicit social cogniti

7、on of aggression, and whether there are same characteristic in the bias and whether it is the same mental structure in explicit aggression as self-report questionnaire so as to find the underlying causes that peasant wor

8、kers commit crime for building a harmonious society in resolving the aggressive behavior of peasants in providing strategic information and crime problems. The result: (1) Non-agricultural workers and peasant workers in

9、the two joint task groups have significant differences; the two groups of peasant workers of the joint task reaction time are significantly higher than those of non-agricultural workers groups. (2) Two kinds of questionn

10、aire scores of the group of peasant workers are significantly higher than those of non-agricultural workers groups. The four dimensions on questionnaire of aggression are scored significantly higher than non-farm workers

11、 groups. (3) Men and women have not significant difference in implicit aggression. Dimensions in physical attacks on men scored significantly higher than women. Women scored higher than men in the speech attack dimension