版權(quán)說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、西北師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文馮友蘭新理學(xué)“氣“范疇研究姓名:賀曦申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專業(yè):中國(guó)哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:范鵬2008-06西北師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文 馮友蘭新理學(xué)“氣”范疇研究 Abstract As a Chinese philosopher, during the 1930’s to 1940’s,F(xiàn)eng Youlan constructed a sys
2、tem of New Neo-Confucianism philosophy to respond to the age problems of the Chinese and the western culture conflict.He took a milder attitude to the conflict of the scientific rationality and humanistic spirit,trying t
3、o unite to them and to realize the “Transforming Knowledge into Wisdom“ in the New Neo-Confucianism. New Neo-Confucianism,as a kind of generalized philosophy, has a complete formal system and pays attention to the life .
4、 People can improve themselves by studying New Neo-Confucianism .However, its system has two fractures: one is a fracture between metaphysics and materialism, another is a deviation from noumenon and realm . This theory
5、contradictory has been completely shown from New Neo-Confucianism’s “Qi“ category,and because of the problems of the definition of “Qi“ category and its utilization , which deepened contradictory of New Neo-Confucianism
6、theory system. From the theory origin, Feng Youlan ,by comparing Chinese philosophy and Western philosophy,used the logical analytic method to explain “Qi“ category after Cheng Zhu Neo-Confucianism. At that time,he was
7、taken “form - material“ pattern influence and accepted the standpoint of Neo-realism .In New Neo-Confucianism system,on the one hand,“Qi“ category is playing a very important role.It took as “ material“ to connect metaph
8、ysics with materialism, as “Qi-bing“ to connect noumenon with realm. It makes up for the incompetence of “Li“ in the construction of New Neo-Confucianism system.On the other hand,because of the contradictory of the defin
9、ition of “Qi“ category and its utilization of the deviation,it makes the fracture between metaphysics and materialism and the deviation from noumenon and realm, and it deepens the conflict of New Neo-Confucianism system
10、. Comparing with “Neng“ from Tao Theory by JinYuelin, New Neo-Confucianism’s “Qi“ category shows that its logical hypothesis is lacking in the self sufficient activity and the inconsistency about definitions and utilizat
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 馮友蘭新理學(xué)“氣”范疇研究.pdf
- 馮友蘭新理學(xué)的“理”范疇研究
- 馮友蘭新理學(xué)的“理”范疇研究.pdf
- 馮友蘭新理學(xué)天人觀研究
- 馮友蘭新理學(xué)道論研究
- 馮友蘭新理學(xué)天人觀研究.pdf
- 馮友蘭新理學(xué)道論研究.pdf
- 10682.馮友蘭新理學(xué)天人觀研究(1)
- 馮友蘭新理學(xué)體系的歷史哲學(xué).pdf
- 論馮友蘭新理學(xué)“境界”之可能.pdf
- 論馮友蘭“新理學(xué)”的哲學(xué)思想.pdf
- 馮友蘭新理學(xué)人生哲學(xué)思想研究.pdf
- 以哲學(xué)代宗教何以可能——馮友蘭新理學(xué)的視角.pdf
- 空與靈——馮友蘭新理學(xué)中本體與境界的完美結(jié)合
- 馮友蘭新理學(xué)探析——以形而上學(xué)和人生哲學(xué)為例
- 空與靈——馮友蘭新理學(xué)中本體與境界的完美結(jié)合.pdf
- 馮友蘭新理學(xué)探析——以形而上學(xué)和人生哲學(xué)為例.pdf
- 護(hù)理道德范疇新
- 程朱理學(xué)的“義”范疇研究.pdf
- 論馮友蘭哲學(xué)“無極而太極”之新.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論