簡介：華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文中國社會轉(zhuǎn)型時期公共權(quán)力異化的哲學(xué)思考姓名冷梅申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)馬克思主義哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師李光玉2003510華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文ABSTRACTPUBLICPOWERALIENATIONISDIFFERENTFROMTHEORIGINALPOWERWHICHPOWERITSELFPRODUCESTHEOPPOSEMIGHTANDLOSETHE15RIMARYQUALIMTIVEREGULATIONONEOFTHEEXTREMEREPRESENTATIONSOFPOWERALIENATIONISCORRUPTIONJIANGZEMINPOINTSOUTINTHEREPORTMADEINTHE16THNATIONALCONGRESSOFTHECOMMUNISTPARTYOFCHINA‘PREVENTINGANDCOMBATINGCORRUPTIONISAIMPORTANTPOLITICALTASK?！甌HEPARTYMUSTNOTONLYREALIZETHEPRESSUREOFANTICORRUPTION，BUTALSEALIZETHATITWILLCONTINUEALONGPERIODTIMETHEPARTYMUSTNEVERWAVERINCARRYINGONTHEFIGHTAGAINSTCORRUPTIONBYMAKINGSTEADFASTCONFIDENCEANDMAKINGSOLIDWORK’’CONSIDERINGTHEPROBLEMOFPOWERALIENATIONWENOTONLYTHINKPOWERALIENATIONITSELFBUTALSOANALYZETHECAUSESOFPOWERALIENATIONANDDISCUSSTHEMEASURESTHEPURPOSEISTOMAKETHEPARTYSTATUSSTABLEANDMAKETHEPOWERENDOWEDWITHBYPEOPLESERVETHEPEOPLEINDEEDTHUSTHEFUNDAMENTAIINTERESTSOFTHEPEOPLECANBEREALIZEDATTHESAMETIME，THEREFLECTIONISTOIMPROVETHECADRE’DIATHESISWHICHISREQUIREDTOBEENHANCEDATTHEPRESENTTIMETHEARTICLEAIMSTOCONSIDERTHEPROBLEMOFPOWERALIENATIONINTRANSITIONALPERIODBASEDONMARXISMTHEORYSOCIALISTMARKETECONOMYTHEORYANDPOLITICALTHEORYETETHEARTICLEANALYZESTHEQUESTIONINVOLVINGTHREEASPECTSFIRSTLYHOWTOLOOKATTHEPHENOMENONTHEAUTHORTHINKSPOWERALIENATIONISASICKPHENOMENONASHUMANCOMEINTOPOLITICALSOCIETYTHEOWNERSOFPOWERAPPLYPOWERTOENLISTPRIVATEINTERESTSTHUS，THEPOWERDEVIATESTHECOMMONOBJECTIVEANDVIOLATESTHEPEOPLE’SINTERESTS，JUSTICEANDVALIDITYTHEAUTHORANALYZESTHEQUESTIONFROMSUCHWAYSASPROCESSANDINTERIORSTRUCTURESECONDLYWHYDOESPOWERALIENATETHEARTICLEANALYZESTHECAUSESLEADINGTOPOWERALIENATIONINTHEPOLITICALANDECONOMICPERSPECTIVEMOREOVER，WEEXAMINETHESEEDBEDOFPOWERALIENATIONFROMTHECULTUREASPECTFINALLYHOWCALLWEPREVENTANDCONTROLPOWERALIENATIONTHEARTICLEHASPUTFORWARDASERIESOFSUGGESTIONFROMTHEINSTITUTIONALINNOVATION，F(xiàn)OSTERINGCIVILSOCIETYANDFORMULATINGTHECIVICCULTUREKEYWORDSSOCIALTRANSITIONPUBLICPOWERALIENATIONII

簡介：點擊查看更多基督教民主黨在歐洲一體化中的地位和作用.pdf精彩內(nèi)容。

簡介：復(fù)旦大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文國家援助的行政法規(guī)制源自歐洲聯(lián)盟法律秩序的經(jīng)驗與啟示姓名李風(fēng)華申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)行政法指導(dǎo)教師朱淑娣2002520ABSTRACTWITHINCREASINGPOLITICALANDECONOMICINTEGRATION，EUMPEALLUNION“EU，，11ASUNDOUBTEDLYBEENRECOGNIZEDAS“地坶INTEGRATEDINTERNATIONALORGANIZATIONINTHEWORLD，WHICHAIMSATTHEEUROPEANINTEGRATIONASAWHOLEEULEFRAMEWORKWITHTHEDEVELOPMENTOVERTHEYEARSBOASTSUNIQUEANDSTRIKINGCHARACTERISTICS，WHICHHASDRAVMTHEACADEMICS’ATTENTIONGLOBALLYALSOPARTLYDUETOTHELONGSTANDINGHISTORYANDWELLDEVELOPEDECONOMYITISWORTHMENTIONINGTHATEUSEXPERIENCEANDLESSONSBYWAYOFRESOLVINGVARIOUSUNEXPECTEDPROBLEMSALEPARTICULARLYPREFERABLEBYOTHERCOUNTRIESANDREGIONSINCLUDINGA】INAEULEGALFRAMEWORKONTHEWHOLE，HASBEENMUCHDISCUSSEDWITHTHERESULTTHATTHEEUITSELFANDITSLEGALARRANGEMENTSHAVEBEENUNDERSTOODHOWEVERREADERSSTILLHAVELIMITEDACCESSTOSOMESPECIFICMEASURESWHICHENVISAGEDTHEDETAILEDREASONINGANDRATIONALESTATEAIDCONTROLISONEOFFREQUENTLYTRIGGEREDMEASURESUBJECTTOTHECOMMISSION’SREVIEWSTATEAJD，BYDEFINITION，ISAVARIETYOFPREFERENTIALACTSRANGINGFROMTAXREDUCTIONTOSUBSIDIESWHEREBYEACHMEMBERSTATEMAYPROMOTESPECIFICSECTORINDUSTRYORUNDERTAKINGWITHINTHEJURISDICTIONINTHECONTEXTOFEUINTEGRATION，THOSEMEASURESWILLCIRCUMVENTTHEEUSDEVELOPMENTBYTHREATENINGORDISTORTINGCOMPETITIONAMONGTHEEUENTERPRISES，THUSSTILESCMFMIZEDBYTHECOMMISSIONTHEAUTHORHASBEENTR燦GTOELABORATETHEORIGMOFSTATEAIDASWELLASTHESUBSTANCEANDPROCEDURES，INPARTICULARTHEPRINCIPLESANDPROCEDURALARRANGEMENTSINREGⅫDTO1FINA’SRESPONSETOTHESTATEAID，THEAUTHORPROVIDESABRIEFANALYSISFRAMEWORKANDTAKESTHEVIEWTHATITWILLBEBENEFICIALTO】LINAIFTHISMEASURECANBEINVOKEDTOELIMINATETHEREGIONALGAPBETWEENTHEEASTANDTHEWESTINCHINAWHHCHINA’SENTRYINTOWIO，CONTROLOFREGINNALAIDWILLBEOFMORESIGNIFICANCEWITHAVIEWTOEQUALLYDEVELOPINGECONOMYINCHINA

簡介：華東政法學(xué)院碩士學(xué)位論文歐洲法律一體化研究以制定歐洲民法典為中心姓名張斐申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)法律史指導(dǎo)教師何勤華李秀清20030415一歐洲各國民法的重要性歐洲民法典最主要的支持聲來源于對市場統(tǒng)一的要求法的安定性也是要求制定歐洲民法典的依據(jù)之一然而反對論者則以維護歐洲多元法律文化為由堅決反對制定歐洲民法典隨著時代的發(fā)展歐洲多元的法律文化正日益表現(xiàn)出相互融合的趨勢歐洲法律一體化是大勢所趨而歐洲民法典則是歐洲法律一體化進程中革命性的一步法律體系的共同點是制定歐洲民法典的基石然而歐洲民法典的制定決非一日之功諸多技術(shù)性困難需要實踐中長期的努力才有攻克的可能歐洲民法典最終要經(jīng)歐盟立法機關(guān)制定并通過才能生效然而歐盟是否具有制定歐洲民法典的職權(quán)卻是一個值得商榷的問題從歐盟條約的規(guī)定看歐盟條約并沒有直接賦予歐盟任何機構(gòu)制定歐洲民法典的職權(quán)但歐盟具有在直接影響統(tǒng)一大市場的建立與功能的問題上可以以指令的方式統(tǒng)一各成員國法律的職權(quán)歐洲民法典直接關(guān)系到人們的切身利益因此歐盟目前對此問題表現(xiàn)得極為謹(jǐn)慎在制定歐洲民法典的活動中權(quán)力機關(guān)僅在很小的領(lǐng)域以指令和判例的方式在一定程度上實現(xiàn)了歐洲法的統(tǒng)一而學(xué)術(shù)界則提出了各種各樣的建議這些都極大的推動了歐洲民法典的制定進程歐洲法律一體化包括但不限于歐洲民法典的制定在其他領(lǐng)域歐洲法律一體化的趨勢也很明顯這表明歐洲法律一體化乃是歐洲法律多領(lǐng)域的一體化關(guān)鍵詞歐洲民法典法律一體化

簡介：山東大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文歐元與歐洲一體化姓名王珂申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)國際政治指導(dǎo)教師劉玉安20030410山東丈學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文操作平臺，完善歐盟的外交政策和共同安全與防務(wù)政策，進而影響歐盟與美、俄、以及歐盟內(nèi)部之間的關(guān)系。四、歐元所面臨的挑戰(zhàn)單一貨幣政策能否和各國財政政策達成協(xié)調(diào)，以及歐元啟動后來自內(nèi)部和外部的阻礙歐洲一體化進程加快的各種因素，都使得歐元的發(fā)展存在著多個變數(shù)，增加了不穩(wěn)定性。五、歐元的前景歐元近期內(nèi)呈現(xiàn)出“弱貨幣”的態(tài)勢，但是在將來，從全球貿(mào)易規(guī)模上來看，歐元將成為重要的貿(mào)易結(jié)算貨幣。從資本市場的廣度、深度來考慮，歐元將成為國際金融市場上一種重要的投資貨幣。隨著歐盟成員國開放程度的提高，歐元在世界貨幣中的地位也將會增強。關(guān)鍵詞歐元歐盟歐洲一體化2

簡介：首都師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文馬歇爾計劃與早期歐洲一體化進程姓名李莉申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)世界史指導(dǎo)教師韓莉20030501ABSTRACT“MARSHALLPLAN”。I，E“EUROPEANRECOVERYPROGRAM”，WASANECONOMICAIDANDEXPANDINGPLANBROUGHTFORWARDBYUSSECRETARYOFSTATE，GEORGECMARSHALLINHISHARVARDSPEECHONJUNE51947THEMARSHALLPLANCALNEINTOE最CTUNDERTHEBACKGROUNDOFTHECOLDWARTHROUGHWHICHAMERICASTABILIZEDCAPITALISTMLEOFWSTEMEUROPEANDCONTAINEDSOVIETUNIONANDINSUREDAMERICA’SHEGEMONYINTHEMARSHALLPLANAMERICAFORTHEFIRSTTIMEPUTFORWARDTHEIDEAOF“EUROPEANINTEGRATION’WHICHINDICATEDTHERIGHTPATHTOEUROPEANECONOMICRECOVERYANDDEVELOPMENTTHANK5TOTHEMARSHAILPLAN，THENATIONSINWESTEMEUROPEFOUNDEDASERIESOFECONOMICCOOPERATIVEORGANIZATIONS，SERING血EWESTERNEUROPEANECONOMYONTHERIGHTTRACKANDLAYINGASOUNDFOUNDATIONFOREUROPEANINTEGRATIONSINCETHISTHESISINTENDSTOANALYZETHEFORMATIONANDEVOLVEMENTOFAMERICANPOLICYONEUROPEINTEGRATIONDURINGTHEMARSHALLPLAN，ANDITISEXPECTEDTOHELPUNDERSTANDTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENAMERICAANDEUROPEINTHISPERIODITCONSISTSOFFOURPARTSASFOLLOWSTHEFIRSTPARTDETAILSTHEBACKGROUNDANDCAUSESOFTHEMARSHALLPLANANDDISCUSSESTHEFORMATIONANDEVOLVEMENTOFTHEIDEAOFEUROPEANINTEGRAFTONINTHEMARSHALLPLANTHESECOND曬RID‘均RCHANGEDTHEWORIDANDNOTCOOPERATIONBUTANEWROUNDCONTESTFOREUROPEBEGANBETWEENTHEUSANDSOVIETU耐ONTHEREAFTERFROM1945TO1947AMERICAOFFEREDASERIESOFAIDUNDERTHEGUIDANCEOF‘‘BALANCEDRESTORATION’’POLICYWHICHTURNEDTOBEUNSUCCESSFULCOMPAREDWITHTHEPREVIOUSPROGRAMSOFAIDTHEMARSHALLPLANCANLEWITHSOMENEWCHARACTERISTICSASTHEFIRSTOFITSKIND，ITPUTFORWARDTHEIDEAOFEUROPEANINTEGRATIONFORMALLYTHEPOLICYONBOOSTINGEUROPEANINTEGRATIONWASNOTCONTRARYTOAMERICANGLOBALSTRATEGIESANDINTERESTSTHETHESISFURTHERSTHECAUSEOFAMERICANSUPPOSINGEUROPEANINTEGRATIONPARTIIANALYZESTHEREACTIONOFEUROPEANCOUNTRIESTOTHEMARSHALLPLANASWELLASTHEIDEAOFEUROPEANINTEGRAFIONWESTERNEUROPEANCOUNTRIESWELCOMEDMARSHAILPLANANDINJULY1947THEYFOUNDEDCEECTOCOOPERATEWITHTHEMARSHALLPLANDURINGTHEWHOLECOURSEOFAID，AMERICACONSTANTLYADVOCATEDTHEIDEAOFEUROPEANINTEGRATION，BUTMETMANYTROUBLESINPRACTICEOEECCOUNTRIESSEEMINGLYACCEPTEDTHEIDEABUTINFACTTLEYWEREINTERESTEDINTHEAIDFROMAMERICAOEECSTILLREMAINEDANINTERGOVERNMENTALORGANIZATIONTHOU吐WESTEMEUROPECOUNTRIESCOOPERATEDINALOOSEMANNERITSURELYCREATEDACOOPERATIVEATMOSPHERETOSOMEEXTER止0EECLAIDAFOUNDATIONFORTHEREALSTALLOFEUROPEANINTEGRATIONPARTIIIEXPOUNDSUPONTHESHNMANPLANANDTHEFOUNDATIONOFECSC，THESIGNALOFTHEOFFICIALLAUNCHOFEUROPEANINTEGRATION、聃TLLTHESUPPORTOFAMERICAFRANCEPUTFORWARDTHESHUMANPLAN，WHICHTEMPORIZEDTHETRENDOFWESTERNECONOMICINTEGRATIONANDCATEREDTOAMERICANDESIREFORECONOMICINTEGRATIONANDRECOVERYOFGERMANYTHEFOUNDINGOFECSCINAUGUST1952MEANTTHATTHEUNIONOFWESTEUROPEWASGOINGONTHE

簡介：南京師范大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文合法化、合理性與正義程序訴訟程序的哲學(xué)之維姓名韓德明申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)訴訟法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師李力200351合法化、合理性與J下義程序第3頁共57負(fù)摘要，F(xiàn)F基于分離的事實與規(guī)范的整合需求，訴訟程序獲得了合法性前提，并因內(nèi)在于程序規(guī)則的事件的挑戰(zhàn)和外在于程序規(guī)則的事件的介入而合法化。得以合法化的訴訟程序勢必有其合理性實踐訴求，對此，本文結(jié)合訴訟程序兩種實踐模式一一職權(quán)主義和當(dāng)事人主義一一所表征的兩種合理性內(nèi)涵，指明職權(quán)主義程序模式的工具目的合理性性質(zhì)和當(dāng)事人主義程序模式的規(guī)范價值合理性性質(zhì)／并認(rèn)為它們都是單向度體現(xiàn)了訴訟程序的合理性精神。進而，Y本文引入交往合理性理論，以其作為理論工具分析了訴訟程序的合理性問題，指出訴訟程序涉及犯罪糾紛事實、法律規(guī)范和主體意志三種本體論范疇，從而真正體現(xiàn)合理性的訴訟程序應(yīng)當(dāng)是追求真實、體現(xiàn)正當(dāng)、主體真誠的三位一體。對此，本文還借用語用學(xué)工具，進一步分析和論證了訴訟程序以上三個方面的合理性要求。由于職權(quán)主義或當(dāng)事人主義訴訟程序模式具有刻意設(shè)計的原因，從而作為唯理性設(shè)計的方案在實踐落實上必然難逃自我解構(gòu)的命運。對兩種唯理性設(shè)計的程序模式進行解構(gòu)主義閱讀的結(jié)局，是程序的多元主義或語境主義。當(dāng)然，程序多元主義或語境主義并非對表征交往合理性的訴訟程序理念的顛覆，恰恰相反，程序多元主義正是對程序交往合理性要求的捍衛(wèi)和保證。關(guān)鍵詞訴訟雜殍合法性交往各運，洼語用事正義茬序，程序解構(gòu)

簡介：置南大學(xué)周滅匕學(xué)位論文題名中英對照文化哲學(xué)視野中的國際關(guān)系理論作者姓名郭彥指導(dǎo)教師姓名及學(xué)位、職稱陳喬之教授博士生導(dǎo)師學(xué)科、專業(yè)名稱國際關(guān)系論文提交日期年月日論文答辯日期答辯委員會主席論文評閱人學(xué)位授予單位和日期，一一，，，，，，，加兀妙口滋‘縱“，口，〔流月沁護

簡介：延邊大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文實現(xiàn)中國法治的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)姓名王麗申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)憲法學(xué)與行政法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師何云鵬20070515ABSTRACTATPRESENT，CHINA’SMODERNIZATIONPROCESSOFTHEFULEOFLAWINTOANUNPRECEDENTEDPERJODOFPROSPERITYANDGLORY；HOWEVER，GUIDINGPHILOSOPHYOFTHEMODEMLAWISNOTACONSTRUCTATPRESENT，MANYLEGALPRACTITIONERSHAVEBEENDISCUSSINGTHISISSUEBASEDONTHEANALYSISOFTRADITIONAICHINESEANDWESTEMPHILOSOPHY王1RANCE，THEADVANTAGESANDDISADVANTAGESCOMPAREDTOTHEGAPBETWEENTHETWOSIDESLIE，CONSTRUCTIONOFCHINAINANATTEMPTTOFINDAMODEMPHILOSOPHYOFLAW，TOPMMOTETHERULE0FLAWINTHEPROCESSOFCHINA’S，HELPINSOMEWAYCHINALAWCOURSEOFHISTORICALDEVELOPMENT，ANDALTHOUGHITISNOT1IKETHEWEST，THEREWERECLEARWHICHLAWSCHOOL；HOWEVER，CHINALAWHISTORICALDEVELOPMENTCLEARLYHASAMAINLINE；FRANCEINPARTICULARISTHEPHILOSOPHYOFCIVILJZATIONISVERYCLEALCHINAANDFRANCEISLHATTBEPHILOSOPHYOFCJVINZATJONJSBASICALLYCONFUCIANPHILOSOPHYTOTHEMAINSTREAM，WITHLAWLESSONSATTHEPHILOSOPHY_OFSUPPORT，TOTAOISTPHILOSOPHYTOADDTHATSUCHANINHERITEDFTOMTHECONTEXTWESTEMPHILOSOPHYCIVILIZATIONTOAMORE0BVIOUSMODEMWESTEMSCHOOLFOURDAFAISTHEENTIREWESTEMSOCIETYPHILOSOPHYOFTHELAWWEREINTEGRATEDTHEFEFORE，THISPAPEFANALYZESTHECHINESEANDWESTERNREPRESENTATIONOFTHESEJURISTSTHEPHILOSOPHYCONNOTATION，ANDTOCONLPARETHEIRRESPECTIVEADVANTAGESANDDISADVANTAGESISTHEHOPEOFMODERNCHINESEPHILOSOPHYEXPLORETHEDEVEL叩MENTOFTHEBRIGHTLIGHTSUPATRACEANCIENTCHINESELAWISTHEFIRSTMETHODFROMTHEBE西NNINGOFTLLEPHILOSOPHICALMETHOD；WESTERNJURJSTSANCIENTMETHODWASFIRSTINPOLITICALSCIENCE卸DPHILOSOPHYMETHODBEGANVISIBILITYANDWESTERNPHILOSOPHYRESEARCHPERSPECTIVEFORTHEDEVELOPMENTOFJURISPMDENCEWASTOESTABLISHTHEBASICFRAMEWORKANDSTARTEDTHEFIRSTLAWPRACTICEAILCIENTPHILOSOPHYANDMETHODSHAVEBEENEXAMINEDBYTHEINTERESTANDFOCUS，THEAUTHORALSOPHILOSOPHICALMETHODTOINJECTSUCHAGREATENTHUSIASMANDINDEPTHTHINKINGCATEREDTOTHEMODERNSTUDYOFTHESCIENCEOFPARADIGMSHIFTTHETRENDTHATISTOEXAMINETHECONTENTBASEDMETHODOLOGY；THEVALUE0FASINGLETFENDFROMTHECLASSWILLSHIFTVALUEPLURALISM；PHILOSOPHYRESEARCHMETHODSFROMTHEOVERALLTENDENCYOFTHEMODE加DOCTRINEOFINDIVJDUALISMLAWT00LS，INTHISTIMEOFTHETRENDOFTHETIMESINTHECONTEMPORARYMARXJSTPHILOSOPHYBASEDONTHEANALYSISOFSEVERALWELLKNOWNCHINESEANDWESTERNSCHOOLOFLAWPHILOSOPHY，CHINESEANDWESTERNLEGALMETHODSII

簡介：山東大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文俄羅斯“融入歐洲”一種建構(gòu)主義的分析視角姓名葛麗申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)國際政治指導(dǎo)教師臧秀玲20070401山東人學(xué)碩I學(xué)位論文ABSTRACTTHECATACLYSMOFEASTERNEUROPEANDTHECOLLAPSEOFTHESOVIETUNIONFROMTHEENDOF1980STOTHEBEGINNINGOF1990SPUTALLENDTOTHESTABLEBIPOLARPATTERNDURINGTHECOLDWAR．THEMAJORWORLDPOWERSBEGANTOREADJUSTTHESTRATEGYWHEREUPON．INORDERTOREVITALIZETHEECONOMYANDTOREGAINTHEPOSITIONOFABIGCOUNTRY,THENEWRUSSIABEGANTODETERMINETHEFOREIGNPOLICYOFFITTINGINTOEUROPE，ANDTOOVERALLIMPROVETHERELATIONSHIPWITHWESTEMCOUNTRIES．MAINLYTHECOUNTRIESINEUROPE．WITHTHEGRADUALDEEPENINGOFINTEGRATION,THEINDEPENDENCEOFTHEEUROPEANUNIONTOAMERICABECAMESTRONGERANDSTRONGER，BUTITHASNOTMUCHPOWERTOCOMPETEAGAINSTAMERICAONHISOWN．SOTHEEUROPEANUNIONHASTOGETTHEHELPFROMRUSSIA．THUSTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENRUSSIAANDTHEEUWASORIENTEDONCEAGAIN，ANDTHEIRAREASOFCOOPERATIONBEGANTOEXPAND．CONSTRUCTIVISMISANIMPORTANTBRANCHOFWESTERNINTERNATIONALRELATIONSHIPTHEORIES，WHICHLOSEIN1990S．ITMAINTAINEDTHEOPINIONTHATTHEWORLDPOLITICSSHOULDBETREATEDASTHEVIEWPOINTOFSOCIOLOGY，THATORGANIZATIONALRULESANDRECOGNITIONSHOULDPLAYIMPORTANTROLESINTHEPROCESSOFCOUNTRYACTIONSANDINTERESTS．ANDTHATTHEBEHAVIORCORPUSESANDTHESYSTEMSTRUCTUREWEREINTERDEPENDENT．THEWORLDPOLITICSEXISTTHROUGHSOCIALCONSTRUCTION，ANDTHISCONSTRUCTIONWASBASEDONTHEAPPROVALTOEACHOTHER’SINTERESTS．THISARTICLE，CONSIDERINGCONSTRUCTIVISMASTHEBASICANALYSISTOOLS．TAKINGRUSSIADETERMININGTHEFOREIGNPOLICYOFENTRYINTOEUROPEASABREAKTHROUGHPOINT．ELABORATESTHELARGECHANGESBETWEENRUSSIAANDEUROPEINRECENTYEARS；ITANALYZESTHEPROCESSANDREASONOFTHEDETERMINATIONOFTHEFOREIGNPOLICYFROMTHEVIEWOFCONSTRUCTIVISM．THENANALYZESTHEFACTORSWHICHAFFECTFURTHERDEVELOPMENTOFTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENRUSSIAANDEUROPE，ANDINTHELASTPREDICTSTHEPROSPECTSOFRUSSIA‘SENTRYINTOEUROPE．THEREWASARGUMENTABOUTRUSSIA’SSTRATEGICLOCALIZATIONAFTERTHECOLDWARWITHINRUSSIA,ANDFORMEDATLANTICPRINCIPLEEUROPEPRINCIPLE，MODEMEUROPEANDASIAPRINCIPLEANDNEWSLAVPRINCIPLETHREESCHOOLS．RUSSIAINORDERTOPROMOTETHEECONOMYASSOONASPOSSIBLE．HASCHOSENTHEDIPLOMATICSTRATEGYOF“ENTRYINTOEUROPE”．AFTER2

簡介：湘潭大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文吳經(jīng)熊對霍姆斯法律哲學(xué)之承繼與超越姓名李冬松申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)法學(xué)理論指導(dǎo)教師黎曉平20070605IIABSTRACTSINCETHEINITIATIONOFLEGALREFMATIONINLATEQINGDYNASTYCHINESELAWYERSHAVEDEVOTEDTHEMSELVESTOTHEQUESTOFLEGALSIGNIFICANCEINTHEPEOPLE’SLIVINGAMONGTHEMJOHNCHWUISTHEMOSTEMINENTFHISGIFTEDCOGNITIONOFLAWPROFOUNDUNDERSTINGOFTHETRENDSOFLAWDEVELOPMENTTHESPIRITOFLAWHISFIRMBELIEFINPOSITIVISMMETAPHYSICSTHROUGHOUTHISACADEMICQUESTHEHASENDEAVEDTOTRANSCENDIENTALOCCIDENTALTHEIESOFLAWWU’STHEYOFLAWISABUNDANTINITSCONTENTHISPHILOSOPHYOFLAWINPARTICULARHISTHREEDIMENSIONTHEYOFLAWISWIDELYTAKENASTHEIGINATIONOFCHINESENEOANALYTICALSCHOOLOFJURISPRUDENCEPROVIDINGENRICHINGTHELEGALARGUMENTATIONOFHOLMES’PREDICTIVETHEYOFLAWHEATTACHESMUCHIMPTANCETOTHERESEARCHONTHESCIENTIFICMETHODSINJUDICIALPROCESSTHEPSYCHOLOGICALFACTSINLAWINTRODUCESPSYCHOLOGYINTOLEGALRESEARCHHETAKESLAWASANARTOFBALANCINGINTERESTSDEMONSTRATESHISSPLENDIDINTUITIONINTHEUSEOFTHISARTFOLLOWINGSTTHOMASAQUINASWUBASESNATURALLAWONTHEREALWLDMAKESITALIVERULETHATCHANGESTOTHEDEVELOPMENTOFSOCIETYTHISTHESISPRESENTSACOMPARATIVEANALYSISOFWU’SHOLMES’PHILOSOPHIESOFLAWFTHEQUESTOFTHESPECIALVALUEOFWU’STHEYOFLAWWU’SNEOANALYTICALLEGALTHEYTHOUGHIGINATINGINHOLMES’THEYDEVELOPSANEWSCHOOLOFTHEYONTHEBASISOFACOMPOUNDOFTHOUGHTSOFMANYOTHERLEGALSCHOOLSPROMOTESTHEDEVELOPMENTOFTHEREALISMJURISPRUDENCETOANEWSTAGEHISINTELLECTUALCONTEMPLATIVEINTUITIONINSPIREDBYHOLMES’PERCEPTIONOFLAWINTEGRATESTHECHINESEINTUITIONHOLMES’INTOANEWSTYLEOFPERCEPTIONOFLAWHISTHEYOFNATURALLAWINTEGRATESSCIENCERELIGIOUSWSHIPETERNALITYTRANSIENCECHANGEABILITYPERSISTENCEWHICHPROVIDESINSPIRATIONSFTHECURRENTPREDOMINANCEOFPOSITIVISMRELATIVISMINLEGALRESEARCHTHISTHESISISCOMPOSEDOFFIVEPARTSTHEINTRODUCTIONPARTINTRODUCESTHEBACKGROUNDOFTHISRESEARCHCURRENTDEVELOPMENTOFTHEAREAPERSPECTIVESTHESTRUCTUREOFTHETHESISCHAPTERONEANALYZESHOLMES’PHILOSOPHYOFLAWFROMWU’SPERSPECTIVECHAPTERTWOINTRODUCESWU’SPHILOSOPHYOFLAWFOCUSINGONHISNEOANALYTICALTHEYOFLAWTHEYOFNATURALLAWEPISTEMOLOGYOFLAWCHAPTERTHREEPRESENTSACOMPARATIVEANALYSISOFWU’SHOLMES’PHILOSOPHIESOFLAWTOPROBEINTOTHELINKSBETWEENTHETWOTHESPECIALFEATURESOFWU’STHEYOFLAWTHECONCLUSIONPARTPRESENTSCOMMENTSONWU’SPHILOSOPHYOFLAWKEYWDSJOHNCHWUHOLMESNEOANALYTICALJURISPRUDENCEPREDICTIVETHEYOFLAWEVOLVINGNATURALLAW

簡介：浙江大學(xué)博士學(xué)位論文董仲舒政治哲學(xué)發(fā)微姓名崔濤申請學(xué)位級別博士專業(yè)中國古典文獻學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師崔富章20040401ABSTRACTCONFUCIANPHILOSOPHYISTHEMOSTIMPORTANT“IDEAISTICGENE”O(jiān)FCHINESECULTUREWHICHCANNEVERBEIGNORED，ANDTODAYWECANNEVERTALKABOUTCHINESEPHILOSOPHYTHOUGHTWITHOUTTHISSCH001WHILEINTERMSOFCONFUCIANPHILOSOPHYITSELFDONGZHONGSHU，ACONFUCIANSCHOLARWHOLIVEDINWESTHAN，HADPLAYEDAGREATROLEINTHEHISTORICALPROCESSOFCONFUCIANTHOUGHT’SDEVELOPMENT，EVOLVEMENTANDFORMINGITSOWNSTYLEITISPROVIDEDTHATWECALLNOTDISCOURSEDONCHINESEPHILOSOPHYWITHOUTCONFUCIANISM，THENWECANALSONOTDISCOURSEONCONFUCIANISMWITHOUTDONGZHONGSHUEITHERHISSTORYORHISLEARNINGISACONTROVERSIALBUTATTRACTIVE“PROBLEM“THISDISSERTATIONMAKESOMETRIALINDIVIDUALREADINGONDONG’SPOLITICALPHILOSOPHICALTHOUGHTTHISDISSERTATIONINCLUDESASFOLLOWSAFEWCHAPTERSPRIMARILYINTRODUCTIONFROMHORIZONOFPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYBYPHENOMENOLOGICALHERMENEUTICREADINGMETHOD，IANALYZETHEHISTORICALORIGINOFTHETHEORYOFTHEDONGZHONGSHUANDTHEPRESENTSTUDYCONDITIONSBRIEFLYANDEXPATIATETHEPOSSIBILITYOFHISTHEORYTOBEREGARDEDASAKINDOFPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYANDTHEATTITUDEWESHOULDHOLDTOWARDSREADINGHISTEXTCHAPTERIIDISCUSSTHERECONDITECHARACTEROFDONG’SPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYIANALYZEDONG’SHORIZONOFUNSCRAMBLINGCLASSICINAWAYOF‘‘HISTORICALCREATINGCOMPREHENSION’’ANDHISREADINGTOTHEWRITINGOFCHUNGMWHICHHEREGARDED∞APOLITICALAFFAIRCHAPTERIFIDISCUSSDOOG’SHISTORICAL‘SAY”ABOUTTHEIDEAOFSECULARVALUEIDISCUSSDONG’SESTABLISHMENTOFTHECONCEPTIONOFCONFUCIAN“VIITUOUSPOLITICS”德政ANDHISREASONINGONBENEVOLENCE仁WHICHHEREGARDEDASANATION’SJUSTICEFROMHISLOGISTICDIALECTICOFCONFUCIANTHEORYOFHUMANISMCHAPTERIIIINTHISCHAPTERIDISCUSSTHEPROBLEMOFDONG’SPOLITICALPHILOSOPHY’SAPPEALINGTOTHEMETAPHYSICSOFTHEFOUNDATIONOFSECULARVALUEIEXPOUNDTHEINDIVIDUALEFFORTWHICHDONGZHONGSHUHASMADETOPURSUETHEULTIMATEFOUNDATIONOFCONFUCIANPOLITICALPHILOSOPHY，ANDTHEEXISTENTIAL“VIEWWORLD”WHICHHEHASCONSTRUCTEDWITHGOD天ASITSCORGANDHISTHOUGHTOFINDUCTIONBETWEENGOD天ANDHUMANBYWHICHHEHASMADEHISDISCOURSESURPASSTHEAMBITOFTHEEXISTENTIALHORIZONCHAPTERIVIDISCUSSDONG’SHISTORICALJUSTIFICATIONFORTHEVALIDITYOFTEMPORALREGIMEINTHISCHAPTERIEXPOUNDDONG’SPOLITICALIDEAOFESTABLISHINGAKINDOFDIVINEPOLITICALETHICBYWHICHHEALLEGEDTHATREGALITYCOMEFROMGOD天THEDEMONSTRATIONOFTHISIDEAISRADICALLYBASEDUPONDONG’SSERIOUSATTITUDEONTHESIGNIFICATIONOFTHESACRIFICEFORGOD天ANDDONG’SAMBITIONOFEXPECTINGTOMOLDAKINDOFNATIONALMYTHOFETHICALRELIGIONHASBROUGHTSOCALLED“EXOTERICPOLITICS”ANDTHEINSTITUTIONALIZATIONOFCONFUCIANISMATLAST，IDISCUSSDONG’SINHERITINGANDDEVELOPINGOFTHETRADITIONALREVOLUTIONARYSPIRITOFCONFUCIANISM，ANDTHEFOREORDINATIONOFCONFUCIANWRITINGREVOLUTIONTENDINGTOWARDSDISCOURSEDESPOTISMINDONG’SPOLITICALPHILOSOPHYKEYWORDSDONGZHONGSHU，CHUNQ掘FANLU，POLITICALPHILOSOPHYCONFUCIANISM2

簡介：中圖分類號UDC學(xué)校代碼10055密級公開高蕊犬淫碩士學(xué)位論文梁啟超政治法律思想及其哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)LIANGQICHAO’SPOLITICALLEGALTHOUGHTANDPHILOSOPHYFOUNDATION答辯委員會主席評閱人南開大學(xué)研究生院二。一。年十一月南開大學(xué)學(xué)位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明本人鄭重聲明所呈交的學(xué)位論文，是本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下進行研究工作所取得的研究成果。除文中已經(jīng)注明引用的內(nèi)容外，本學(xué)位論文的研究成果不包含任何他人創(chuàng)作的、已公開發(fā)表或者沒有公開發(fā)表的作品的內(nèi)容。對本論文所涉及的研究工作做出貢獻的其他個人和集體，均已在文中以明確方式標(biāo)明。本學(xué)位論文原創(chuàng)性聲明的法律責(zé)任由本人承擔(dān)。學(xué)位論文作者簽名崔鍪2010年11月26日非公開學(xué)位論文標(biāo)注說明本頁表中填寫內(nèi)容須打印根據(jù)南開大學(xué)有關(guān)規(guī)定，非公開學(xué)位論文須經(jīng)指導(dǎo)教師同意、作者本人申請和相關(guān)部門批準(zhǔn)方能標(biāo)注。未經(jīng)批準(zhǔn)的均為公開學(xué)位論文，公開學(xué)位論文本說明為空白。論文題目申請密級口限制≤2年口秘密≤10年口機密≤20年保密期限20年月日至20年月日審批表編號批準(zhǔn)日期20年月日南開大學(xué)學(xué)位評定委員會辦公室蓋章有效注限制★2年可少于2年秘密★10年可少于10年機密★20年可少于20年

簡介：華中科技大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文從哲學(xué)的角度思考當(dāng)代中國法治的合理性及其實現(xiàn)姓名譚振起申請學(xué)位級別碩士專業(yè)科學(xué)技術(shù)哲學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師李思孟20050501IIABSTRACTTHISPAPERUNDERTHEGUIDEOFHISTICALMATERIALISMFOCUSESONTHREERELATEDPROBLEMTHENEWUNDERSTINGOFESSENCEOFLAWFROMLAWTORULEOFLAWCHINESERULEOFLAWREALITYITHINKTHATBASICPOINTOFVIEWOFMARXISMISTHATLAWISIGINATEDFROMTHEECONOMICBASISWHICHISBASEDONTHELEVELOFPRODUCTIVITYTHISPOINTEXPOSESREASONABILITYOFLAWFROMREGULARITYOFLAWTHEREASONABILITYOFLAWINFACTCONTAINSACCDANCEWITHREASONABILITYWHICHISCONTENTOFPURPOSEOFMANMARXHIMSELFREGARDPRACTICINGSPIRITWAYASESSENCEOFLAWTHISPOINTWASNEGLECTEDBYTHEETICALCIRCLEWHICHISHELPFULTOUSTOUNDERSTTHEREASONABILITYOFLAWTHATRULEOFLAWFMEDINWESTERNSOCIETYISNOTINCIDENTALFROMTHEBEGINNINGOFWESTERNCULTUREANCIENTGREECEROMEHADNATURELAWTRADITIONOFADVOCATINGRULEOFLAWREASONABILITYTHESECONDPARTOFTHISPAPERDISCUSESTHEHISTYOFRULEOFLAWFROMTHEPOINTUNIFMOFHISTYLOGICASCONTRASTTHEPAPERDISCUSESTHEANCIENTCHINESETHOUGHTSOFLAWTHEDIFFERENCEBETWEENANCIENTCHINATHEWESTMANIFESTDIFFERENCEOFCULTURESTHEROOTLIESINTHEDIFFERENCEOFECONOMICLIFESTYLEDEVELOPMENTOFMARKETECONOMYMAKESTHESOCIALSUBJECTSFROMSTATUSTOCONTRACTWHICHATLASTLEADTORULEOFLAWNOWCHINAHASESTABLISHEDTHEAIMOFRULEOFLAWTHISISTHERESULTOFUNDERSTINGTHEIMPTANCEOFRULEOFLAWOTHERWISEITISTHEDEMOFSOCIALISTMARKETECONOMYFURTHERMEECONOMICGLOBALIZATIONTHEENTRANCEOFWTOMAKESITINTERNATIONALDEMSCONSIDERINGCHINESEREALISTICSITUATIONTHEROADOFREALIZINGRULEOFLAWISAROADLEADINGBYTHEGOVERNMENTWHICHISDIFFERENTFROMTHEWESTERNKEYWDSCHINALAWRULEOFLAWREASONABILITYREALIZATION

簡介：西北大學(xué)博士學(xué)位論文十七世紀(jì)西方數(shù)學(xué)的自然哲學(xué)背景沿著笛卡爾的“思”路姓名蒙虎申請學(xué)位級別博士專業(yè)科學(xué)技術(shù)史（數(shù)學(xué)史）指導(dǎo)教師李文林20030529ABSTRACTTAKINGTHEDEVELOPMENTOFMATHEMATICSINWESTERNRATIONALTRADITIONASTHEBASICTHREADANDSPRINGBOARD，REVIEWINGTHEINFLUENCEOFREBOUNDOFTHEVIEWOFTHENATUREINGREECEANDRELIGIONATYREFORM，COMBININGTHECHARACTERISTICSOFTHE“SCIENCEOFQUANTUM”O(jiān)FWESTERNMATHEMATICSIN17THCENTURY,THEARTICLENOTONLYPROVIDESABUNDANTBLURRYCONTINUUMOFQUANTITYDIRECTLYANDDEFENDSFORTHE‘‘RATIONALITYOFARITHMETIC’’INDIRECTLYBUTALSOEXPATIATEDTHATTHEPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREWHOSECHARACTERISTICS甜ETHEQUANTIFICATIONOFTHENALNREANDTHEMECHANIZATIONOFTHEUNIVERSEHASAGREATINFLUENCEOVER17“CENTURY’S“MATHEMATICSOFARITHMETIC”，ESPECIALLYOVERTHEBIRTHANDTHEDEVELOPMENTOFANALYTICGEOMETRYANDCALCULUS．THEARTICLEGOESALONGCARTESIANTRAINOFTHOUGHTS，CLARIFIESTHATWHILETHENEWMATHEMATICSWHOSECOMMISSARYISCALCULUSISTHENEWBYPRODUCTOF“RETRIEVINGPHENOMENA’INTHEWESTEN3TRADITIONALLOGES，THEPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREAFTERREVIVALOFLEARNINGWHICHWASGREATLYINFLUENCEDBYTHEWESTERNLOGESOFTRADITIONHASALREADYFORMEDANEWEFFECTIVEWHYOF“RETRIEVINGPHENOMENA’INWESTLOGESFROMTHEQUANTIFICATIONOFTHEPROSPECTOFTHEWORLDTOTHEMATHEMATICATLONOFTHEPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATURE．SOMEFAMOUSHISTORIANSOFSCIENCESUCHASBOTERANDA．KOYRDEMPHASIZEDTHATTHEOUTSTANDINGCHARACTERISTICOFNEOTERICMATHEMATICSIS“MATHEMATICATION”INTHEIRSERIESOFCLASSICALBOOKSSUCHASTHEBASEOFNEOTERICPHYSICS∞METAPHYSICS．STUDYOFGALILEO,FROMTHECLOSEWORMTOTHEINFINITEUNIVERSE．PROFESSORWUGUOSHENGOFPHILNSOPHYDEPARTMENT,PEKINGUNIVERSITYALSOCONCENTRATEDONTHISISSUEINHISBOOKSSUCHASTHEERRORINNOUMENONOFTHENATURE，THERETREATOFTHENATURE，CONCEPTOFTIME．THEYDISCUSSEDTHEISSUEFROMASPECTSOFNEWPROSPECTOFTHEUNIVERSEANDTHENATURE，CHARACTERISTICSOFPHYSICSPHILUSOPHYOFTHENATURE，ETC．THESAMETHINGOFTHESESCHELESSONTHISISSUEISTHATTHEYALLCONCENTRATEDONTHETHEORETICSURFACE．ASARESULT,WECALL’TSEETHEINFLUENCEOFSCIENTIFIC“MATHEMATIZATION’’ONTHEDEVELOPMENTOFMATHEMATICSITSELF．THEARTICLETAKESMATHEMATIZATIONASTHECHARACTERISTICOFNEOTERICSCIENCEBYSTARTINGFROMTHEBACKGROUNDOF17“CENTURY’SPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREANDREVIEWINGTHREEASPECTS．THESET11REEASPECTSATETHEMATHEMATIZATIONOFTHEPROSPECTOFTHENATUREWHICHISBASEDONTHETRADITIONOFPYTHAGORAS，THEMECHANIZATIONOFTHEPROSPECTOFTHEUNIVERSEWHICHISBASEDOOTHETRADITIONOFCHRISTIANISM，ANDTHEDEDUCTINGOFTHESYSTEMPHYSICSWHICHISBASEDONTHETRADITIONOFEUCLID．ATTHESALTLETIME，THEPOINTTHATMUSTBECLARIFIEDISTHATTHEESTABLISHMENTOFTHENEWVIEWOFTHENATUREANDTHEBOOMINGOFTHEPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREOFFEREDTHENECESSARYQUALIFICATIONOFMATHEMATIZATION．AFTERANALYZINGTHEPROCESSOFMATHEMATIZATION，SEVERALCONCLUSIONSALESUMMEDUPASFOLLOWS．FIRST．WHILETHESUBJECTSINVEMIGATEDOF17“CENTURY，SMATHEMATICSINCLUDETHEMIXTUREOFTHESTRUCTUREOFSEQUENCE，THESTRUCTUREOFALGEBRAANDTHEFUZZYQUANTUMINTHESTRUCTURETOPOLOGY．ANDITISNOTHINGOTHERTHANTHENEWPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREWHOSECHARACTERISTICSARETHEQUANTIFICATIONOFSUBSTANCEANDTHEMECHANIZATIONOFTHEMOVEMENTTHATDEFENDSTHEEXISTENCEANDTHEPROPERTYOFTHISQUANTUMSECOND．THEQUANTIFICATIONOFSUBSTANCEANDTHEMECHANIZATIONOFTHEMOVEMENTWHICHAREEMPHASIZEDBYTHENEWPHILOSOPHYOFTHENATUREOFFERSAINTUITIONISTIEEONTINUUNWHICHTAKESTHEEXTENSIONOFTHESPACE．TIMEFORTHEBIRTHOFCALCULOUS．ITISNOTHINGELSETHANTHEDIVISION．THESUMMINGANDTHERATIOOFTHEINMITIONISTICCONTINUUNTHATBECOMETHEBASICMANNERINWHICH