2023年全國碩士研究生考試考研英語一試題真題(含答案詳解+作文范文)_第1頁
已閱讀1頁,還剩5頁未讀, 繼續(xù)免費閱讀

下載本文檔

版權說明:本文檔由用戶提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權,請進行舉報或認領

文檔簡介

1、HealthPolicy107 (2012) 98–103ContentslistsavailableatSciVerseScienceDirectHealthPolicyjournalhome page:www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpolEnhancingpublictrustinthefoodsafetyregulatorysystemAndrewPapadopoulos a,?, JanM.Sar

2、geant b, ShannonE. Majowicz a, ByronSheldrick c, CarolynMcKeen a, JeffWilson d, CatherineE.Dewey aa DepartmentofPopulationMedicine,OntarioVeterinaryCollege,UniversityofGuelph,Guelph,Ontario,CanadaN1G2W1b Departmento

3、fPopulationMedicine,CentreforPublicHealthandZoonoses,UniversityofGuelph,Guelph,Ontario,CanadaN1G2W1c DepartmentofPoliticalScience,CollegeofSocialandAppliedHumanScience,UniversityofGuelph,Guelph,Ontario,CanadaN1G2W1d Novo

4、metrixResearchInc,RR1,Moffat,Ontario,CanadaL0P1J0a r t i c l e i nfoArticlehistory:Received5April2011Receivedinrevisedform3May2012Accepted29May2012Keywords:FoodsafetyTrustTransparencyGovernmentregulationPublicheal

5、thpracticea bs t r ac tObjective:It is worth examininghowpublichealth agenciescan enhancethe public’strustinthe food safetyregulatorysystem.This paper will focuson the food safetysystem, whichcanbe defi

6、nedas thoseinvolvedin the safe manufacture,storage,handling,display, dis-tribution,sale or offer for sale, preparation,processingor serviceof food. Specifically,thepaperwill summarizeand discussliterature

7、relatingto public expectationofpublichealthagencyaction regardingprotectingthe foodsupplyand recent policyreforms.Methods:A meta-interpretationwas conductedto identifycommonthemesin peer-reviewedpublicationsand

8、mediasources.Literaturesearchesretrieved39 relevantarticlespublished,resultingin 19 peer-reviewedarticles, 8 media,8 governmentreports,and 4legislationdocuments.Results:Thepublicexpectsa safe foodsystemand they l

9、ack confidencein the currentsystem.Theydesireincreasedscientificallytransparentcommunicationfrom a trustedsource, astrongerpublichealthpresence,a coordinatedfood safetyregulatorysystem,and increasedaccessto inspe

10、ctionresults.Conclusions:Publichealthagenciesmust communicateeasily understoodtransparent,sci-entificinformationto the public. Inspectiondisclosuresystemshave beeneffective inincreasingtransparency.Publichealthage

11、nciesmusthave astrongpresencein a coor-dinatedfood safetyregulatoryframework.© 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.1.IntroductionAwarenessoffoodsafetyissuesamongthepublichasincreasedduetoanumberofsigni

12、ficantandwell-publicizedthreatstopublichealth[1–3].Overthepast? Correspondingauthorat:DepartmentofPopulationMedicine,203AMacNabbHouseOntarioVeterinaryCollege,UniversityofGuelph,Guelph,Ontario,CanadaN1G2W1.Tel.:+151982441

13、20x53894;fax:+15197661730.E-mailaddresses:apapadop@uoguelph.ca(A.Papadopoulos),sargeanj@uoguelph.ca(J.M.Sargeant),smajowic@uoguelph.ca(S.E.Majowicz),sheldric@uoguelph.ca(B.Sheldrick),cmckeen@uoguelph.ca(C.McKeen),jeffwil

14、son@novometrix.com(J.Wilson),cdewey@uoguelph.ca(C.E.Dewey).fewdecades,numerouspublichealthcriseshaveerodedconsumertrustinthepublichealthfoodsafetyregulatorysystem[1–6].Thepopulation’shealthdependsontheavail-abilityofsafe

15、food;therefore,itisimperativethatthepublichastrustintheirfoodsupplyandinthefoodsafetysystemandtheagenciesresponsibleforoverseeingit.Indevelopednations,thereisaprevailingexpectationthattheproductswepurchase,prepare,andcon

16、sumearesafeandwillnotcauseillness[4]. Publichealthagenciesareinvolvedinfoodsafetypolicytosafeguardcommunityhealthforthepublicgood[7]. ThepublicalsohasalegalrighttoexpectthefoodtheypurchaseissafebasedonEUlegislation.Con

17、taminatedfoodisnoteasilyidentifiablebycon-sumers,placingmuchoftheonusforfoodsafetyon0168-8510/$–seefrontmatter ©2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.05.010100 A.P

18、apadopoulosetal./HealthPolicy107 (2012) 98–103Table1Literaturesearchterms.Specificsearchphrasesusedfollowedgeneralsubjectareasearches.SearchtermsConsumer/publicperceptionANDvulnerabilityANDfoodsupplyPublicANDexpectationA

19、NDpublichealthANDfoodsupplyPolicyevolutionANDpublichealthFactorsANDdecisionmakingANDpublichealthpolicyEffectiveness*ANDeducationANDcampaign*ANDpublichealthConsumer/publicbehavi?rANDfoodsafetyEffectivepublicANDhealthpolic

20、yANDformation/creationConsumer/publicperceptionANDfood(supply)protection/safetyGovernmentANDsafeguarding*ANDfoodsupplyGovernmentANDsafeguardingANDfoodGovernmentANDpublicperceptionANDfoodPublicperceptionANDfoodprotectionP

21、ublicperceptionANDfoodsafetyPolicyANDfoodANDpublicperceptionPolicyANDfoodsafetyPublicexpectationANDfoodsupplyPublicperceptionANDvulnerabilityANDfoodsupplyRiskANDpublicperceptionANDfoodPublicopinionANDgovernmentANDfoodsaf

22、etyPublicopinionANDgovernmentANDfoodarticleswereaddedtotheelectronicreferencingtoolRef-Works,andtheneachwasreviewedinitsentirety.Thefinalinclusioncriteriaresultedinallofthethreeresearchersreadingandreviewingthepeer-revie

23、wedarticleindepen-dently,andthentogetherverifyingthatitaddressedtheissueofpublictrustinthefoodsupplywithincontext,anditsfindingscontributedtothisresearch.Eachresearcherreviewedtherelevantdocumentsandnotedmentionofanypubl

24、icexpectationswithregardtofoodsafety,andanypolicyreformsundertakenbypublichealthagencies.Theresearchersthencomparedtheirfindingswithoneanothertoensureaccuratedataextraction.Thesefindingsformedthedataforthisstudy.Initiall

25、y,onlypeer-reviewedarticleswereaccepted;however,theliteraturesearchwasexpandedtoincludemediapublicationsusingthesamesearchprocessandtermsaswiththepeer-reviewedsearch.Duringtheanal-yses,agapwasidentifiedinthepublic’sthoug

26、htsandopinionsonfoodsafety.Thepurposeofmediareportingistoprovideawarenesstothepublicregardingsignificanteventsandtheresearchersfeltthatinclusionofmediapub-licationswouldcontributetothedataregardingthisgap,asthemediaboths

27、hapesandrevealspublicviewpoints[1,2,4].Thethreeresearchersextractedpointspertainingtothepublic’sopinionand/orperceptionofthefoodsafetysystemfrommediaarticlesinordertoenhanceinforma-tionfoundthroughpeer-reviewedliterature

28、.Forexample,interviewsegmentswithmembersofthepubliccontainedwithinmediaarticleswereconsideredtobereflectiveofpublicsentiment.Notwithstanding,articlesfrommediasourcestendedtoincludemultipleviewpointswhichprovidedabalanced

29、reviewofthenewsitem.Therearelimitationstorelyingsolelyonmediareportingasdatasincethesereportingmethodsarenotgroundedbyscientificmethodsandmaybeone-sidedintheirpresentation.3.ResultsTheliteraturesearchesretrieved357articl

30、es,ofwhich39weredeemedrelevant.Therelevantarticleswerecat-egorizedintopeer-reviewed(19),media(8),governmentreports(8),andlegislation(4).3.1.PublicexpectationregardingfoodsafetyThepublicquestionswhetherlocalpublichealthag

31、en-ciesarecontinuouslyworkingtoprotecttheirfoodsupply[4,8].Informationonfoodsafetyissuesshouldbetrans-parent,andfromatrustedandknowledgeablesource[5,8,24,25].Physiciansandthemedicalcommunityareusu-allyseenashighlytrusted

32、bythepublic,followedcloselybylocalpublichealthagencies[1,26,27].Stateandprovincialagenciesarenotastrusted,primarilyduetopastexperi-encesinwhichthepublicperceivedattemptedcover-upsoffoodsafetycrisesbytheseagencies[1,2,4–6

33、,8,25,28,29].Effectiveriskcommunicationiscriticalinmaintainingpub-lictrustafterafoodsafetyevent[1,2,5,25].Provisionoftransparentscientificinformationtoinformthepublicmaysupportpublictrustinpublichealthagencyaction[5,24,2

34、5,30].Thepublicwantspublichealthagenciestodemon-strateleadershipinfoodsafety[8,27,30].Constituentsarenotconfidentthatpublichealthagenciesarelookingaftertheirhealthandwell-beingand,specificallytheirfoodsup-ply[2,8,30].Con

35、sumersareunabletoassessthesafetyoftheirfoodpersonally[4], andthusneedtorelyonawell-functioningindustrysupportedbyawell-functioningandtransparentregulatorysystem[8,28,30,31].3.2.FoodsafetypolicyreformInOntario,thereisamo

36、vementawayfrommorepre-scriptivelegislationandrequirementsandtowardahealthoutcome-basedandpubliceducationapproachleadingtoa“buyerbeware”phenomenon.TheMandatoryHealthPro-gramsandServicesGuidelineshavebeenreplacedwiththeOnt

37、arioPublicHealthStandards,whichsetshealthoutcometargetsasitsmeasureofpublichealthactivity[32,33].Aself-regulatedindustrydoesnotenjoythetrustofthepublic,asthepublic’sgeneralperceptionisthatindus-trywillnotbeforthcomingwit

38、himportantinformationthatmayimpactitsshort-orlong-termviability[8,19,26].Thepublicbelievesthatanagencycannoteffectivelypro-moteandpoliceitselfsimultaneously[19,26,27,29].Publichealthagencieshavearesponsibilitytoensurecon

39、sumerconcernsaredealtwithinarespectfulmanner[8].Inordertoregainthepublic’strustintheirpublichealthsystemand,moreimportantly,inthefoodthattheycon-sume,policysolutionsshouldincludetransparencyandpublicparticipationinthepro

40、cess[4,5].Deregulatingbasedonincreasingsystemefficiencies,improvingindustryprof-itability[19],ortorespondtopublicpressurewhilenotcompletingathoroughriskassessmentcanbedetrimentaltopublichealth[28].Certainrecentfoodsafety

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無特殊說明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權益歸上傳用戶所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁內(nèi)容里面會有圖紙預覽,若沒有圖紙預覽就沒有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫僅提供信息存儲空間,僅對用戶上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護處理,對用戶上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對任何下載內(nèi)容負責。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權或不適當內(nèi)容,請與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準確性、安全性和完整性, 同時也不承擔用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

最新文檔

評論

0/150

提交評論