公司人格否認(rèn)后的責(zé)任探討.pdf

1、湘潭大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文公司人格否認(rèn)后的責(zé)任探討姓名：曹云野申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士專業(yè)：經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師：彭熙20070430IIAbstractDisregardofcpatepersonalityreferstoalawsalvageproposedftherealizationoflawequityjusticefthefactualinequityinterestimbalanceresultingfromcontrolsharehol

2、der’sabuseofcpatelegalpersonalityshareholderlimitedliability.Itspurposeliesinthefactthatunderthespecialcircumstanceoflawthecreditcaninvestigatecontrolshareholder’slegalliabilitiesthroughthe“cpateveil”tomakecreditgainmefc

3、efulprotection.ButthenewLawofCpationinourcountryprescribesthattheshareholderofthecpationshouldundertakejointliabilityfthecpatedebtsifheabusescpateindependentlegalstatusshareholderlimitedliabilitytoescapeshisherdebtssoast

4、odoharmtocredit’sinterestwhichcompletelyignesrelativelitigant’serrs.Investigatingcontrolshareholder’sjointliabilityinanycircumstanceswillleadtocontradictyinliabilitytheieswillbeunfavableftheinterestprotectionofthecpation

5、otherminityshareholders.Theliabilityafterthedisregardofcpatepersonalityisacterizedthattheshareholderasthethirdpersonbesidesthecontractrelationshipbetweenthecpatethecreditbaseshisliabilityonttbutthecpationbasesitsliabilit

6、yonviolatingthecontract.Thesearetwolegalliabilitieswithtotallydifferentnature.Therefefromcommonsignificanceitisnonessentialjointliabilitynotjointliability.Thedeionofliabilitysystemafterthedisregardofcpatepersonalitybynew

7、LawofCpationlacksitsreasonability.Itisinbadlyneedtodefineinterrelatedaccusationrulestomatchtheliabilitysystem.Therefetheresearchonthissubjectisofprofoundtheeticpracticalsignificanceitalsobecomesanextremelyurgentdeminthey