毛奇齡《四書改錯》研究.pdf

1、分類號UDC埸H1大譬YANGZHOUUNIVERSITY碩士學位論文(學術(shù)型)毛奇齡《四書改錯》研究金鳳學號叢15QQ32密級——指導教師姓名：塞9瑾豎煎撞，揚劌太堂，婆苤揚劌，22墨QQ里申請學位級別：碩士論文提交日期：2Q!晝生魚旦論文答辯日期：2Q!墨生魚旦學位授予單位：塑劌盤堂學位授予日期：2Q!墨生魚旦答辯委員會主席：堡鎣豎塾撞2018年6月2揚州大學碩士學位論文AbstractMaoQiling(毛奇齡)isagreats

2、cholaroftheearlyQingDynastywhoseknowledgeiscomprehensiveandabundant，buteasytodistinguishthegoodfromoaths，andeagertowinoverothers，SOitiscontroversialintheacademicworldHewroteSiShuGaiCuof《四書改錯》)inordertefuteZhuXi(朱熹)，andsa

3、idthat”noneoftheFourBooksisgood”，andsystematicallycorrectedandcorrectedZhuXi’SnotesAlthoughtherearesubtlechanges，therearealsosomemistakes，SOtheacademiccirclesalsopraiseandcriticizetheminamixedWaVUptonowtheresearchonSiShu

4、GaiCuohasbasicallystayedatthemacrolevelOccasionallytherehavebeenarticlesontheclassificationoftheSiShuGaiCuoitems，butonlyonthescientificleveloftheclassificationofthestyleThecorrectandwrongandvaluemeaningofMao’Scorrectionh

5、asnotbeencombedindetailInthispapertheauthormakesaconcreteanalysisoftheSiShuGaiCuofromseveralaspects，suchascorrectionoferrors，takeasuperfluousactionandSO0nIntheSiShuGaiCuo，thepeople，things，land，historyandthesystemoftheboo

6、kintheTheFourBooks(《四書章句集注》)havereallybeenexaminedindetail，thereisathoroughexaminationoftheoriginoftheoriginalandthecorrectionofZhuXi’SwrongnotesThephoneticmeaningofsomeofthecharactersisexplained，theclassicsarequoted，the

7、errorsarecorrected，andtherearesomereasonablereasonsTherearemanydrawbacksintheSiShuGaiCuoForsomeoftheannotationsinZhuXi’STheFourBooks，MaoQilinghadnotbeenprovedtobethefirsttobreak，andheWasgreatlymistakenIthasbeenalteredoru

8、nprovenorinconclusive，andthishasbeendoneSomeentriesofZhuXi’STheFourBookshavebeenverified，andtheconclusioniscredible，whichhasalwaysbeenpromotedbyscholarsHoweverMaoQilingwillful，somedidnottesttheassumptionofchange，somelack