陳詞、證據(jù)與認(rèn)知.pdf

1、X762522洳；：●博士學(xué)位論文⑧論文題目一睦鲴：適據(jù)生認(rèn)翅作者姓名———————』出jL————指導(dǎo)教師——星基絲——學(xué)科(專業(yè))置堂赴冒踅堂所在學(xué)院厶奎堂筮提交日期2Q鰱生且!目一一英文摘要Thedissertationstudiestheproblemsoftestimonyinepistemologyandphilosophyoflinguistic，itisconstitutedthreepans：PartOne，Overv

2、iews，includesChapterOnetoThreeThefirstChapterWhatisTestimonyintroducesconceptandroleoftestimonyaswellasthepossiblecausesforignoranceoftestimonySecondChapterHistoricalexplore，drawsthreelinesfortestimony：fundamentalnegatio

3、nfromPlatotoLocke，Humianrecognition，andReidianfundamentalismChapterThree，reviewofcontemporaryWesternstudies，providesresearchmaterialsandfiguresinfoDrdebatesPartTwo，theCharacterandjustificationoftestimonyisconstitutedbyfi

4、vechaptersChapterFouLthedefinition，scopeandlimitsoftestimonydeepenstheconceptoftestimonydescribedinChapterOneThreedebatesarediscussedfromChapterFourtoEighLThefirstonediscussedinChapterfivejsthedebatebetweeninferetialisma

5、ndnoninferentialismwhichfocUSonhoWtestimonialknowledgeformedSecondisdebateonhowtojustifytestimonybyfundamentalism(ChapterSix)orbyreductionism(Chapterseven)Thirdoneisdebateonhowknowledgeistransmitted，whichiSdiscussedinCha

6、pterEightThethreedebatesareformulatedingeneraltheoryoftestimonialepistemologywhilethefourthdebateoriginatedfromscientifictestimonywhichconstituteofPanWhlteSclentifieexpertandTesdmonialPracticechaptertendiscussthefourthde

7、ba怡WhichevidencenovicesheulddependoninchoosingexpertsChapterNine，experttestimonyandtrustinscientificpractice，studiestwelativeissuesWhetherornottrustingexpertiseisblindnessAndtrustbasedOBepistemicorethicChapterelevenfigur

8、esconceptsoftestimonialevidenceandtesti移ingbytwocasesinthehistoryofmathematicsThedebatebetweenreductionismandfundamentalismiScentraltoallcontroversiesHowoverthereRrenotSOmuchoppositeintheirviewssuchastheyclaimedTheyarese

9、emtwopolesinlevelofmetajustification，butarefuseinempiricallevelBothreductionismandfundamentalismaredeferentversionsofindividualepistemologyCorrespondingtothreehistoricallineswedifierentiatethreedifietrentversionsofindivi

10、dualepistemology：Lockeianindividualism，HumianindividualismandReidianindividualismBethreductionismandfundamentalismlimittheirdiscussioninidealtexturebetweenspeakerandheareroverlookingthesocialandnaturalcharacteroftestimon

11、ypracticeEpistemologyneedsremodelbysocializingandnaturalizing，“social’’asfoundationofepistemologyandhumannaturalizedeplstemicascoreofepistemologySocializingandnaturalizingareharmonyforsocialepistemieisnaturalone，towardna