從聊齋志異家族倫理看蒲松齡對傳統(tǒng)社會秩序的矛盾思想

1、 曲阜師范大學(xué)研究生學(xué)位論文獨(dú)創(chuàng)性說明 曲阜師范大學(xué)研究生學(xué)位論文獨(dú)創(chuàng)性說明 （根據(jù)學(xué)位論文類型相應(yīng)地在“□”劃“√”） 本人鄭重聲明： 此處所提交的博士□/碩士?論文 《從家族倫理看蒲松齡對傳統(tǒng)社會秩序的矛盾思想》，是本人在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下，在曲阜師范大學(xué)攻讀博士□/碩士?學(xué)位期間獨(dú)立進(jìn)行研究工作所取得的成果。論文中除注明部分外不包含他人已經(jīng)發(fā)表或撰寫的研究成果。 對本文的研究工作做出重要貢獻(xiàn)的個(gè)人和集體，均已在文中以明確的方式注明。本聲明

2、的法律結(jié)果將完全由本人承擔(dān)。 作者簽名： 日期： 曲阜師范大學(xué)研究生學(xué)位論文使用授權(quán)書 曲阜師范大學(xué)研究生學(xué)位論文使用授權(quán)書 （根據(jù)學(xué)位論文類型相應(yīng)地在“□”劃“√”） 《從家族倫理看蒲松齡對傳統(tǒng)社會秩序的矛盾思想》系本人在曲阜師范大學(xué)攻讀博士□/碩士?學(xué)位期間，在導(dǎo)師指導(dǎo)下完成的博士□/碩士?學(xué)位論文。本論文的研究成果歸曲阜師范大學(xué)所有，本論文的研究內(nèi)容不得 以其他單位的名義發(fā)表。

3、本人完全了解曲阜師范大學(xué)關(guān)于保存、使用學(xué)位論文的規(guī)定，同意學(xué)校保留并向有關(guān)部門送交論文的復(fù)印件和電子版本，允許論文 被查閱和借閱。本人授權(quán)曲阜師范大學(xué)，可以采用影印或其他復(fù)制手段保存論文，可以公開發(fā)表論文的全部或部分內(nèi)容。 作者簽名： 日期： 導(dǎo)師簽名： 日期： Abstract IIAbstract The family eth

4、ics based on the “l(fā)iao zhai zhi yi“ as the research object, focus on pu song-ling's ethical thoughts. The full text is divided into five parts. The first part is the introduction, the main reason for the selected t

5、opic and the research status of this article. Ethics is a major part of ancient Chinese philosophy, a traditional intellectuals ethics thought is often represented his main outlook on life, values and world view. Famil

6、y ethics to clarify “l(fā)iao zhai zhi yi“ pu songling thought study is very important. The second part discusses on works of family ethics relationship. Respectively to discuss the relationship between the father and son

7、, husband and wife relationship and brother, etc. Historically researchers in addition to the couple relationship is controversial, thought that pu songling consciously identity and maintenance of orthodox ethical rela

8、tions. This section discusses pu songling renegade tendency under the surface maintenance orthodoxy. The third part discusses pu songling in order to achieve the artistic means of duplicity thought. In his works, the

9、author often consciously or unconsciously to avoid the effect of power on behalf of the role, or simply to power on behalf of the role opposite; And many of the works of the hero character with the mainstream social ord

10、er not cooperative tendency; Some plot in rhetorical deliberately to orthodox ethical order, but the plot is to deviate from the power to order the direction of development; Many hero for the positive role of the story,

11、the plot of propulsion is done by women. The fourth part discusses pu songling destructive thoughts origin. Pu song-ling's rebelling thought is mainly embodied in the traditional ethics order acceptance and cooperati

12、on, but did not form their own ideological system, so he thought more damage and less construction, in a departure from the wavering between traditional and regression. Life pu song-ling jin did not open, social injustic

13、e of pu songling, caused the thirty-six rebellious attitude of orthodox social order; Represented by li zhi rebelling social ideological trend of late Ming dynasty contributed to the pu song-ling doubt on the traditional

14、 social order; Pu songling shape some of the ideal personality obviously influenced by the Taoist thought; Easy generation of Ming and qing dynasties to the influence of the traditional intellectuals mentality is very wi

15、despread, it makes the scholars of all traditional beliefs to waver. The fifth part is the summary. This part mainly summarize the above content and point of view, and simply explain the pu songling destructive thought

16、s of historical and cultural significance. Pu songling's attitude toward the ethical order of the traditional family is very complex. On the one hand, the conscious recognition of traditional elite culture makes him

17、 actively advocates of traditional family ethics order; Itself, on the other hand, rough experience makes him unconscious resistance on the mainstream social order. It constitutes the main contradiction of his thought,

18、and also other contradiction in his thoughts origin. Pu songling's destructive thoughts from his thinking of social life and the thoughts of the traditional culture and the humanities. Because of the mainstream soc

19、ial order pu song-ling conscious identity and their disregard for the construction of ideology, makes his resistance is hidden and very thorough. His resistance on the hidden destructive of the social order. His inabilit