基于學(xué)生為主體的大學(xué)課堂教學(xué)評價——以南昌大學(xué)2009年教學(xué)評比為例.pdf

1、南昌大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文基于學(xué)生為主體的大學(xué)課堂教學(xué)評價——以南昌大學(xué)2009年教學(xué)評比為例姓名：楊玉桃申請學(xué)位級別：碩士專業(yè)：管理科學(xué)與工程指導(dǎo)教師：鄧群釗20091226AbstractAbstractGivingprominencetothedominantpositionofthestudents，givingplaytotheleadingroleoftheteachers，anddevelopingtheinnovationan

2、dpracticalabilitiesofthestudentsaretheurgentneedsforcollegesanduniversitiestotrainthecreativetalentsThestudentsnotonlymasterthebasicknowledge，butalsoleamandreflectactivelyintheclassofthegoodqualityanditissignificanttodev

3、elopthecreativespiritandthepracticalabilityAproblemwhichisbothacademicsignificanceandpracticalvalueishowtomakescientificevaluationoftmiversityclassteachingApplyingtothesystematicalandscientificways，welearnthatthestudents

4、havethestrongdesiretoparticipateintheclassteachingevaluationbuttheylackoftheenthusiasmtodoitWefindthattherearesomereasonstoexplainFirstlytheproblemofunderstandingthesubjects；Secondlytheevaluationsystemisbasedonmeetingthe

5、administers，itdoesn’tconsiderorcompletelyneglecttheneedsofthestudents；Thirdlyitdoesn’testablishthereasonableandeffectiveevaluationindexsystemwhichisfitforthestudents；Finallyitalsodoesn’tsetupthereasonableandtheeffectivew

6、aystOcollectthestudents’evaluationdata，anditdoesn’tsetcoordinatedandunifiedteachingqualitycontrolsystemWeconfirmtheuniversityclassteachingindexsystemofthestudents’evaluationthatismainlyonthestudentsthroughquestionnairean

7、dresearchaboutthestudentsWemakeUSeofittoestablishtheweightsbymeansofanalytichierarchyprocessandmakearesearchon40teacherswhoaleexcellentintheteachingevaluationofNanchangUniversityin2009，andusethefuzzycomprehensivejudgment

8、toanalyzetheresults，atlast，comparethestudents’evaluationresultswiththeexperts’evaluationresultsSowesuggestthatweshouldcombinetheteachers’evaluationthemselves，teachers’evaluationamongeachothertheexperts’evaluationthestude