在輕軌軌道上行走致輕軌停運(yùn)行為的定性研究.pdf

1、1內(nèi)容摘要近年來，關(guān)于在輕軌軌道上走動(dòng)致輕軌停運(yùn)的案例屢見不鮮，但被當(dāng)作刑事案件來處理的實(shí)屬罕見。本文以譚某案為例，對(duì)這種行為進(jìn)行了定性，對(duì)各種分歧意見進(jìn)行了辨析，并對(duì)譚某的行為為何構(gòu)成破壞生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)罪進(jìn)行了闡釋。全文共分為四個(gè)部分：第一部分是案件的基本情況。先介紹了譚某案的基本案情，再列舉有關(guān)本案的分歧意見，如譚某的行為不構(gòu)成犯罪，構(gòu)成破壞交通設(shè)施罪，構(gòu)成以危險(xiǎn)方法危害公共安全罪，構(gòu)成聚眾擾亂社會(huì)秩序罪，構(gòu)成聚眾擾亂公共場(chǎng)所秩序、交通秩

2、序罪，構(gòu)成尋釁滋事罪，構(gòu)成破壞生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)罪等，最后提煉出本案的爭(zhēng)議焦點(diǎn)，即譚某的行為是否構(gòu)成犯罪，如果構(gòu)成犯罪的話，構(gòu)成何罪。第二部分是相關(guān)問題的法理分析。首先闡述罪與非罪的界限問題，其次闡述危害公共安全類犯罪、妨害社會(huì)管理秩序類犯罪、侵犯財(cái)產(chǎn)類犯罪的界限問題，最后從犯罪構(gòu)成的角度分析各分歧罪名的區(qū)別。第三部分是本案的分析與結(jié)論。以第二部分的分析為基礎(chǔ)，對(duì)本案的各分歧意見進(jìn)行辨析，并得出譚某的行為構(gòu)成破壞生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)罪的正確結(jié)論。第四部分是本

3、案研究的啟示。通過對(duì)譚某案的定性分析，我們可以得到這樣的啟示：對(duì)新類型的案子，不能只從表面現(xiàn)象入手，從慣性思維出發(fā)，而是要對(duì)案件進(jìn)行細(xì)致深入的分析，才能得出正確的結(jié)論。關(guān)鍵詞：輕軌軌道；罪與非罪；破壞生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)罪1AbstractInrecentyearsthecasesofwalkingonthelightrailcausingoutagearenotuncommonbuttheyarerarelytakentodealwithcrim

4、inalcases.InthispaperTancaseisanexampleofthisbehaviIwillqualitativeit.InadditionIwilldiscriminatethedisagreements.FinallyIwillexplainwhyTanactsconstitutethecrimeofdamagingproductionmanagement.Thethesisisdividedintofourpa

5、rts:Thefirstpartisthebasiccircumstancesofthecase.FirstlyIwillintroducethebasicfactsofthecase.SecondlyIwillcitethedisagreementsaboutthecasesuchasTanactsdidnotconstituteacrimeconstitutethecrimeofdestroyingtransptinfrastruc

6、tureconstitutethecrimeofendangeringpublicsafetyusingdangerousmethodsconstitutethecrimeofmobbingtodisturbsocialderconstitutethecrimeofmobbingtodisturbthederofpublicplacestrafficconstitutethecrimeofmakingtroubleconstitutet

7、hecrimeofdamagingproductionmanagement.FinallyIwillpointthefocusofthecontroversyaboutthiscase:whetherTanactsconstituteacrimeifTanactsconstituteacrimewhichcrimetheyconstitute.Thesecondpartistheanalysisoftherelevantlegaliss

8、ues.FirstlyIwillexplaintheboundaryofcrimeinnocence.SecondlyIwillexplaintheboundaryofthecrimeofendangeringpublicsafetythecrimeofimpairingtheadministrationofsocialderthecrimeofagainstproperty.FinallyIwillpointthedifference

9、samongthevariousaccusationsusingcrimeconstitutionthey.Thethirdpartistheanalysisconclusionsofthecase.Theanalysisinthesecondpartisthebaseofthispart.IwilldiscriminatethedisagreementsdrawthecrectconclusionthatTanactsconstitu

10、tethecrimeofdamagingproductionmanagement.Thefourthpartistherevelationofthestudyonthiscase.ThroughthequalitativeanalysisofTancasewecanconcludethat:fanewtypeofcaseyoucannotjuststartfromthesurfacephenomenafrominertialthinki