data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25eee/25eee8cd034d25373145acb6e85e01aaaf014063" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/872f2/872f241c95f04cd6ad2a0e3f36e2a03bfb50b506" alt="論偵查程序中的司法審查.pdf_第1頁(yè)"
版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)
文檔簡(jiǎn)介
1、南昌大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文論偵查程序中的司法審查姓名:王蘭蘭申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別:碩士專(zhuān)業(yè):訴訟法學(xué)指導(dǎo)教師:劉本燕20081229AbstractAbstractTheiudicialreviewsystemhasbeenweIlestablishedinmodemcountriesundertheruleoflaw,anditiSallimportantfeatureoftheruleoflawTheiudicialreviewsystemint
2、heinvestigationproceduremeansthattheneutraliudicialorganizationreviewstheinvestigativeactionstestricttheinvestigativepowetandtosafeguardthecitizenlegalrightsThroughoutWesterncountriesitisacommonphenomenontoestablishtheiu
3、dicialreviewsystemininvestigationprocedureSincechinaislackoftheideaofjudicialreviewlongtime,somesystemdesignsincurrentlawareseriouslydepartingfromthereviewThusithasledtotheseriousstructuredrawbacksofthecurrencycriminalpr
4、oceedingmechanismwhilethewestemcountriesalmostestablishpretrialjudicialreviewsystemThedeficienciesofthesystemleadingtOtheabuseofpower,andthesuspect’SrightsarenotguaranteedThisarticlediscussedtheintroductionoftheiudicialr
5、eviewsystem,anditwascombinedwiththeoreticalstudyandtheconcretepracticeinChinaThearticleiSdividedintofivesectionsPartI,Throughthestudyoftheconceptandtheevolutionoftheiudicialreviewsystem,weknowthattheiudicialreviewsystemr
6、eflectstheseparationofpowersincountriesthus。throughtheanalysisofthenatureoftheinvestigationintroducedthebasistobringinthejudicialreviewsystemininvestigationproceduresPaIrtII,Introducedthethoreticalbasisoftheiudicialrevie
7、wsystemininvestigationprocedureIncludingtheconceptoftheruleof1awtheseparationofpowersandsuperioriudicialpower,proceduralJustice,thethreetrialprosecutionandthedelensestructure,theprotectionofhumanrights,AndSOonPartIII,Stu
8、dytheiudicialreviewsystemofthemajorcountries(Britain。theUnitedStates,F(xiàn)rance,GermanyandJapan),andsummedupthecommoncharacteristicsofthetheiriudicialreviewsystem,desiretogiveUSsomeinspirationinChina’SruleoflawPartIVDiscusse
9、stheexistingstateofaffairsofinvestigationofrightsinChinaFromthepointsthattheinvestigationoftherightiSrunoutofcontr01suspectsarenotguaranteedtheright,tonotedtheneedforUStoestablishtheiudicialreviewsystemPartV,Introducedth
10、erefo咖oftheiudicialreviewsysteminChinaItisthemostimportantpartofthisarticleFirstofa11analysisthesafeguardtoestablishtheiudicialreviewsystemIncludingtwoparts:Oneistheindependenceoftheiudiciary,whichistheSecuritysystem,the
11、otheriSfinaldecisionofJustice,whichisconceptsecuritySecond,fromamacroandmicroaspectsoftheiudicialreviewoftheintroductionofthesystemaredescribedFromthemacroperspective,weshouldtake如llaccountofthefullsituation,whichistheli
12、felinetosettletheiudicialreviewsystemSecondlyweshouldadheretoconbinethepartialimprovementwithrefonnofthesystem,whichiSthestepofthereformAtthemicrosenseintroducedthesubjectofjudicialreview,thescopeandmannerKeywords:Judici
溫馨提示
- 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
- 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
- 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
- 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
- 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
- 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
- 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。
最新文檔
- 論構(gòu)建我國(guó)偵查程序中的司法審查制度.pdf
- 論偵查行為中的司法審查.pdf
- 偵查程序中的司法審查機(jī)制研究.pdf
- 論強(qiáng)制偵查的司法審查.pdf
- 論審前羈押中的司法審查程序
- 仲裁司法審查程序要論.pdf
- 論刑事訴訟審前程序中的司法審查.pdf
- 偵查行為的司法審查制度研究.pdf
- 試論強(qiáng)制偵查行為的司法審查.pdf
- 論偵查程序中的公民參與.pdf
- 強(qiáng)制性偵查行為的司法審查.pdf
- 論偵查程序中律師權(quán)利的完善.pdf
- 論偵查程序中的律師在場(chǎng)權(quán).pdf
- 論偵查程序公開(kāi).pdf
- 論逮捕的司法審查.pdf
- 論仲裁的司法審查.pdf
- 美國(guó)法上陷阱偵查的司法審查法律.pdf
- 論美國(guó)司法審查中“非解釋性審查”.pdf
- 行政程序裁量的司法審查研究.pdf
- 論刑事偵查程序的完善.pdf
評(píng)論
0/150
提交評(píng)論