遺囑自由的限制與特留份制度.pdf_第1頁(yè)
已閱讀1頁(yè),還剩52頁(yè)未讀, 繼續(xù)免費(fèi)閱讀

下載本文檔

版權(quán)說(shuō)明:本文檔由用戶(hù)提供并上傳,收益歸屬內(nèi)容提供方,若內(nèi)容存在侵權(quán),請(qǐng)進(jìn)行舉報(bào)或認(rèn)領(lǐng)

文檔簡(jiǎn)介

1、 學(xué)位類(lèi)別:全日制研究生 分 類(lèi) 號(hào): 學(xué) 號(hào):0703010512 密 級(jí): 青海民族大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文 青海民族大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文 遺囑自由的限制與特留份制度 遺囑自由的限制與特留份制度 學(xué)位申請(qǐng)人姓名: 哈成堂 導(dǎo)師姓名及職稱(chēng): 張立教授 專(zhuān) 業(yè) 名 稱(chēng): 民商法學(xué) 答

2、辯委員會(huì)(簽名): 關(guān)鍵詞: 遺囑自由 限制 特留份 必要的遺產(chǎn)份額 The Restriction of Will Freedom and The Special Portion System ABSTRACT ABSTRACT Like any other freedom, the freedom of testament in the law of inheritance is n

3、ot absolute and necessary restriction conforms to the nature demand of the law of inheritance. The countries of the Continental Law System use a Special Portion System to limit the freedom of testament, even the Common L

4、aw countries, which advocate right supremely, also imposes restriction more or less like the Special Portion System on the freedom of testament to protect the interests of some special obligee in order to achieve social

5、justice. The current law of succession of our country fails to limit the freedom of testament because of its carelessness in legislation and do serious harm to the other relatives, running counter to our family tradition

6、 of moral principles. In this article the author introduces and analyzes the system of testamentary freedom and limitation of the main countries in the world and the flaws of the relevant system of our country , and elab

7、orates the special portion system, putting forward tentative ideas about constructing the Special Portion System in China. Except the introduction and the conclusion part, the paper falls into five parts. In the first

8、part, the author gives a general introduction of the history and development of the will succession. This part analyses in the angle of history the reason why the will succession was established to provide our system wit

9、h reference. The second part points out the reason why the principle needs necessary restriction in angles of philosophy of law and ethnics so that the will freedom principle should be restricted properly and reasonably

溫馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有資源如無(wú)特殊說(shuō)明,都需要本地電腦安裝OFFICE2007和PDF閱讀器。圖紙軟件為CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.壓縮文件請(qǐng)下載最新的WinRAR軟件解壓。
  • 2. 本站的文檔不包含任何第三方提供的附件圖紙等,如果需要附件,請(qǐng)聯(lián)系上傳者。文件的所有權(quán)益歸上傳用戶(hù)所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR壓縮包中若帶圖紙,網(wǎng)頁(yè)內(nèi)容里面會(huì)有圖紙預(yù)覽,若沒(méi)有圖紙預(yù)覽就沒(méi)有圖紙。
  • 4. 未經(jīng)權(quán)益所有人同意不得將文件中的內(nèi)容挪作商業(yè)或盈利用途。
  • 5. 眾賞文庫(kù)僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)空間,僅對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳內(nèi)容的表現(xiàn)方式做保護(hù)處理,對(duì)用戶(hù)上傳分享的文檔內(nèi)容本身不做任何修改或編輯,并不能對(duì)任何下載內(nèi)容負(fù)責(zé)。
  • 6. 下載文件中如有侵權(quán)或不適當(dāng)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)與我們聯(lián)系,我們立即糾正。
  • 7. 本站不保證下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性, 同時(shí)也不承擔(dān)用戶(hù)因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的傷害或損失。

評(píng)論

0/150

提交評(píng)論