民事證明責(zé)任裁判的運(yùn)用.pdf

1、分類號(hào)UDC學(xué)密埸H1大譬YANGZHOUUNIVERSITY碩士學(xué)位論文(全目制專業(yè)型)民事證明責(zé)任裁判的運(yùn)用郭雯號(hào)叢蘭!互Q!魚(yú)!級(jí)——指導(dǎo)教師姓名：疊愛(ài)＆塾撞，揚(yáng)劌太鱟，婆蒸揚(yáng)劌，22墨QQ21訇垂基，蒸劌吏厶氐撿窒瞳，亟苤菱劌，21墨QQ壘申請(qǐng)學(xué)位級(jí)別：碩士論文提交日期：2Q]Z生量月]Q旦論文答辯日期：至Q!Z生量旦至】旦學(xué)位授予單位：揚(yáng)劌盤(pán)鱟學(xué)位授予日期：2Q]Z生魚(yú)月曼Q旦答辯委員會(huì)主席：夏疊塞塾撞2017年6月㈣4洲m㈣

2、3㈨5m7，㈣23呲Y2揚(yáng)州大學(xué)碩士學(xué)位論文AbstractThecivilburdenofproofistherefereeoftheapocryphalcasetaketherationalityofthereferee，asthecasefactsunderastateoftrueandfalseambiguousgray，thejudgeaccordingtotherulesoflawwassettomakeajudgmentC

3、ivilburdenofprooftojudgethesettingistopreventthejudgerefusedonthegroundsoffactsisnotclearforthiscasetomakeajudgment，andrestrictthejudgetoselecttherefereeintheformofascertainingthefactsThecivilburdenofproofistherefereeont

4、hebasisoftheburdenofproofallocationwillbethingfictionas”trueor”false”，thenaccordingtotherelevantlegalnormsmadebytherefereeTheprovisionsofthecivilburdenofprooftothepartiestoacasetodoOurbesttocollectevidence，oncetheevidenc

5、ecollectedbythepartiescannotprovethecasefactsandthecasefactsintheapocryphal，thejudgeisuniversallyapplicabletheburdenofprooftojudgethecaseAtthispoint，thejudgeisbasedonanartificialfacts”，tomakeoneofthepartiestobeartheadver

6、seconsequencesofunknownauthenticityjudgmentInordertoguaranteetheimpartialityofthe”artificial”thereferee，ensurethelegitimacyoftheburdenofproofcasefinallyapply，itisnecessarytoformacompletecivilburdenofprooftherefereeproced

7、ure，toensurethelegitimacyandnecessityofcivilburdenofprooftojudgeInjudicialpractice，thefactisclear，evidencereallyfullytheissuesraisedbythecaseisnotbig，doesnothighlighttheimpartialityofthejudgetojudge，thereisnodirecteviden

8、cethatmorecanclearthetruthofdifficultcasesBecauseofthelackofunifiedtheproceduralguaranteeofcivilevidencerefereeuse，civilburdenofprooftherefereeisusedasatooltoelaboratethecasesometimesAssoonasabuse，civilburdenofproofthere

9、fereeandjudgestherefereeobligationForthejudgesCan’ttrytoinvestigatethecasefactandmakeajudgmentmustbefindawindingpathleadingtoasecludedspotplace；Secondly，forthecasefactsapocryphalisakindofuniversalityoflegalfiction，rather

10、thanthecaseoffiction，SOtheburdenofproofinpracticebytherefereetendtoreflectmoregeneralprinciplesofcivilburdenofproofisthereferee，andignoredthespecialnatureofeachcaseTheuseofthecivilproofresponsibilitytherefereehasimportan

11、tpracticalsignificance，thejudgeinthecaseoftheapocryphal，thejudgmentofhowtouseadefaultapplication，makethejudgewithhiscognitiontodetermineanartificialfactsAsfaraspossibleclosetothetruth，tothespiritofjusticeinlawCombiningwi